CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06482749Updated Jul 31, 2025

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Postoperative Neurocognitive Recovery

An interventional study of Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and Sham stimulation in Older Patients, Cognitive Impairment and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, sponsored by Peking University First Hospital. Recruiting at 3 sites in China. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-31.

Sponsored by Peking University First Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
568
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with preoperative cognitive impairment are at increased risks of delayed neurocognitive recovery (DNR) and postoperative neurocognitive disorder (POCD). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been used to improve cognitive function in patients with cognitive impairement. This trial is designed to compare the effects of rTMS versus sham intervention on postoperative neurocognitive function in patients with preoperative cognitive impairment.

Read the detailed description

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) affects 10-15% of the population over 65 years old. In patients for elective non-cardiac and emergency surgeries, the pooled prevalences of unrecognized cognitive impairment were 37.0% and 50.0%, respectively. Patients with preoperative cognitive impairment are at increased risk of delayed neurocognitive recovery (DNR) and postoperative neurocognitive disorder (POCD). Therefore, perioperative neurocognitive protection is particularly important for patients with preoperative cognitive impairment.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a neural modulation technique. By acting on the brain and altering the membrane potential of cortical neurons, the generated pulsed magnetic fields affect neural metabolism and electrical activity and trigger a series of physiological and biochemical reactions. It was found that high frequency (>5 Hz) rTMS increases cortical excitability, whereas low frequency (\<1Hz) rTMS reduces corticol excitability. The mechanism by which rTMS regulates brain function is generally believed to be related to the long-term enhancement and long-term inhibition of synaptic transmission function.

The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is an important target of rTMS intervention for improving cognitive function. A meta-analysis showed that high-frequency rTMS on the DLPFC and low-frequency rTMS on the right medial prefrontal cortex improved memory function; high frequency rTMS on the right inferior frontal gyrus enhanced executive ability in non-surgical patients with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease. Another meta-analysis showed that high-frequency rTMS on DLPFC is an effective therapeutic option for improving cognitive function in Alzheimer patients.

This trial is designed to compare the effects of rTMS versus sham intervention on postoperative neurocognitive function in patients with preoperative cognitive impairment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Older Patients
  • Cognitive Impairment
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Delayed Neurocognitive Recovery
  • Postoperative Neurocognitive Disorder

Keywords

  • Older patients
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • Delayed neurocognitive recovery
  • Postoperative neurocognitive disorder
03

In context

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,843 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,100 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 568 is above the median of 65 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Peking University First Hospital is the lead sponsor of 378 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged ≥65 years;
  2. Patients with preoperative mild to moderate cognitive impairment, defined as 9\<Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)\<26;
  3. Scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia, with an expected surgical duration of >2 hours;
  4. Expected to stay in hospital for at least 5 days after surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Left-handed;
  2. Primary school education level or below;
  3. Comorbid diseases including mental illness, intellectual disability, auditory and visual dysfunction, language impairment, severe neurological disorders, or other diseases that impede the completion of evaluation;
  4. Neurosurgery;
  5. Presence of contraindications to rTMS treatment, including epilepsy, pregnant or lactating women, or with a metal or electric implanted device (e.g., deep brain stimulator, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, aneurysm clip, pacemaker, cochlear implant, or surgical staples on the scalp);
  6. Other situations that are deemed unsuitable for inclusion in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
568 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Group

    Repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for a 5-day period (1 day before surgery and 4 consecutive days after surgery, twice daily \[10-12 am and 6-8 pm\], no intervention on the day of the surgery). Parameters of rTMS: "8" shaped coil, 10 Hz, 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), 2000 pulses (5s × 40 trains, 25 s interval), 20 minutes.

    Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Stimulation Group

    Sham repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for a 5-day period (1 day before surgery and 4 consecutive days after surgery, twice daily \[10-12 am and 6-8 pm\], no intervention on the day of the surgery). Parameters of rTMS: "8" shaped sham coil, 10 Hz, 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), 2000 pulses (5s × 40 trains, 25 s interval), 20 minutes.

    Device: Sham stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for a 5-day period (1 day before surgery and 4 consecutive days after surgery, twice daily \[10-12 am and 6-8 pm\], no intervention on the day of the surgery). Parameters of rTMS: "8" shaped coil, 10 Hz, 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), 2000 pulses (5s × 40 trains, 25 s interval), 20 minutes.

  • DeviceSham stimulation

    Sham repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for a 5-day period (1 day before surgery and 4 consecutive days after surgery, twice daily \[10-12 am and 6-8 pm\], no intervention on the day of the surgery). Parameters of rTMS: "8" shaped sham coil, 10 Hz, 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), 2000 pulses (5s × 40 trains, 25 s interval), 20 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of delayed neurocognitive recovery

    Cognitive function is assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; scores range from 0 to 30, with higher score indicating better function) before surgery and at 5 days after surgery. A MoCA score reduction of 1 standard deviation (SD) or more from baseline is defined as occurrence of delayed neurocognitive recovery.

    Time frame: On the 5th day after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of delirium

    Delirium is assessed with the 3D-Confusion Assessment Method (for non-intubated patients) or Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (for intubated patients) twice daily (8-10 am and 4-6 pm).

    Time frame: Within 5 days after surgery

  2. Incidence of postoperative neurocognitive disorder at 30 days after surgery

    Cognitive function is assessed with the Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA; scores range from 0 to 22, with higher score indicating better function) at 30±3 days after surgery. A T-MoCA score reduction of 1 standard deviation (SD) or more from baseline is defined as occurrence of postoperative neurocognitive disorder.

    Time frame: On the 30(±3)th day after surgery

  3. Incidence of postoperative neurocognitive disorder at 180 days after surgery

    Cognitive function is assessed with the Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA; scores range from 0 to 22, with higher score indicating better function) at 180±15 days after surgery. A T-MoCA score reduction of 1 standard deviation (SD) or more from baseline is defined as occurrence of postoperative neurocognitive disorder.

    Time frame: On the 180(±15)th day after surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Pain intensity within 5 days after surgery

    Pain intnsity is assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, an 11-point scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain) twice daily (8-10 am and 4-6 pm) during the first 5 days after surgery.

    Time frame: Up to 5 days after surgery

  2. Length hospital stay after surgery

    Length hospital stay after surgery.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery

  3. Incidences of complications within 30 days after surgery

    Postoperative complications are defined as new-onset medical events other than delirium that are deemed harmful and require therapeutic intervention, that is grade II or higher on the Clavien-Dindo classification.

    Time frame: Up 30 days after surgery

  4. Quality of life at 30 days after surgery

    Quality of life is assessed with the World Health Organization Quality of Life brief version (WHOQOL-BREF), a 24-item questionnaire that assesses the quality of life in physical, psychological, and social relationship, and environmental domains. The score ranges from 0 to 100 for each domain, with higher score indicating better function.

    Time frame: On the 30(±3)th day after surgery

  5. Quality of life at 180 days after surgery

    Quality of life is assessed with the World Health Organization Quality of Life brief version (WHOQOL-BREF), a 24-item questionnaire that assesses the quality of life in physical, psychological, and social relationship, and environmental domains. The score ranges from 0 to 100 for each domain, with higher score indicating better function.

    Time frame: On the 180(±15)th day after surgery

  6. Event-free survival within 180 days after surgery

    Time interval from index surgery to cancer recurrence/metastasis/progression, new-onset cancer, new-onset serious illness (requiring hospitalization), or all-cause death, whichever comes first.

    Time frame: Up to 180 days after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
  • Peking University First Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100034, China
    Recruiting
  • Peking University Shenzhen Hospital
    Shenzhen, Guangzhou 516473, China
    • Tao Luo, MD · Contact · luotao_wh@yahoo.com · 0755 83923333
    • Tao Luo, MD · Principal investigator
    Not yet recruiting
  • Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University
    Xi'an, Shannxi 710032, China
    • Zhi-Hong Lu, MD, PhD · Contact · deerlu23@163.com
    • Zhi-Hong Lu, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Anderson ND. State of the science on mild cognitive impairment (MCI). CNS Spectr. 2019 Feb;24(1):78-87. doi: 10.1017/S1092852918001347. Epub 2019 Jan 17. PubMed 30651152 ↗
  • Kapoor P, Chen L, Saripella A, Waseem R, Nagappa M, Wong J, Riazi S, Gold D, Tang-Wai DF, Suen C, Englesakis M, Norman R, Sinha SK, Chung F. Prevalence of preoperative cognitive impairment in older surgical patients.: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2022 Feb;76:110574. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110574. Epub 2021 Nov 5. PubMed 34749047 ↗
  • Park S, Kim J, Ha Y, Kim KN, Yi S, Koo BN. Preoperative mild cognitive impairment as a risk factor of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing spine surgery. Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Jan 12;16:1292942. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1292942. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38282693 ↗
  • Silbert B, Evered L, Scott DA, McMahon S, Choong P, Ames D, Maruff P, Jamrozik K. Preexisting cognitive impairment is associated with postoperative cognitive dysfunction after hip joint replacement surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015 Jun;122(6):1224-34. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000671. PubMed 25859906 ↗
  • Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer. Neuron. 2007 Jul 19;55(2):187-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.026. PubMed 17640522 ↗
  • Du J, Yang F, Hu J, Hu J, Xu Q, Cong N, Zhang Q, Liu L, Mantini D, Zhang Z, Lu G, Liu X. Effects of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in early stroke patients: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial with clinical, neurophysiological and functional imaging assessments. Neuroimage Clin. 2019;21:101620. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.101620. Epub 2018 Dec 3. PubMed 30527907 ↗
  • Wang Q, Zhang D, Zhao YY, Hai H, Ma YW. Effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex on motor recovery in severe hemiplegic stroke: A randomized clinical trial. Brain Stimul. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):979-986. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Apr 2. PubMed 32380449 ↗
  • Chen Q, Shen W, Sun H, Zhang H, Liu C, Chen Z, Yu L, Cai X, Ke J, Li L, Zhang L, Fang Q. The effect of coupled inhibitory-facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on shaping early reorganization of the motor network after stroke. Brain Res. 2022 Sep 1;1790:147959. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2022.147959. Epub 2022 May 30. PubMed 35654120 ↗
  • Gaudeau-Bosma C, Moulier V, Allard AC, Sidhoumi D, Bouaziz N, Braha S, Volle E, Januel D. Effect of two weeks of rTMS on brain activity in healthy subjects during an n-back task: a randomized double blind study. Brain Stimul. 2013 Jul;6(4):569-75. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.10.009. Epub 2012 Nov 19. PubMed 23194830 ↗
  • Alcala-Lozano R, Morelos-Santana E, Cortes-Sotres JF, Garza-Villarreal EA, Sosa-Ortiz AL, Gonzalez-Olvera JJ. Similar clinical improvement and maintenance after rTMS at 5 Hz using a simple vs. complex protocol in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Stimul. 2018 May-Jun;11(3):625-627. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.011. Epub 2017 Dec 29. PubMed 29326021 ↗
  • Bressler SL, Menon V. Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Jun;14(6):277-90. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 20. PubMed 20493761 ↗
  • Li Y, Wang L, Jia M, Guo J, Wang H, Wang M. The effects of high-frequency rTMS over the left DLPFC on cognitive control in young healthy participants. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 14;12(6):e0179430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179430. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28614399 ↗
  • Chou YH, Ton That V, Sundman M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of rTMS effects on cognitive enhancement in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2020 Feb;86:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.08.020. Epub 2019 Aug 27. PubMed 31783330 ↗
  • Simko P, Kent JA, Rektorova I. Is non-invasive brain stimulation effective for cognitive enhancement in Alzheimer's disease? An updated meta-analysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Dec;144:23-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Sep 28. PubMed 36215904 ↗
  • Gao Y, Qiu Y, Yang Q, Tang S, Gong J, Fan H, Wu Y, Lu X. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training for cognitive function and activities of daily living in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2023 Jun;87:101919. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.101919. Epub 2023 Mar 31. PubMed 37004840 ↗
  • Chu CS, Li CT, Brunoni AR, Yang FC, Tseng PT, Tu YK, Stubbs B, Carvalho AF, Thompson T, Rajji TK, Yeh TC, Tsai CK, Chen TY, Li DJ, Hsu CW, Wu YC, Yu CL, Liang CS. Cognitive effects and acceptability of non-invasive brain stimulation on Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a component network meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;92(2):195-203. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323870. Epub 2020 Oct 28. PubMed 33115936 ↗
  • Miller A, Allen RJ, Juma AA, Chowdhury R, Burke MR. Does repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improve cognitive function in age-related neurodegenerative diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;38(8):e5974. doi: 10.1002/gps.5974. PubMed 37526325 ↗
  • Zhang Y, Shan GJ, Zhang YX, Cao SJ, Zhu SN, Li HJ, Ma D, Wang DX; First Study of Perioperative Organ Protection (SPOP1) investigators. Propofol compared with sevoflurane general anaesthesia is associated with decreased delayed neurocognitive recovery in older adults. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Sep;121(3):595-604. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.05.059. Epub 2018 Jul 27. PubMed 30115258 ↗
  • Jeste DV, Palmer BW, Appelbaum PS, Golshan S, Glorioso D, Dunn LB, Kim K, Meeks T, Kraemer HC. A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;64(8):966-74. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.8.966. PubMed 17679641 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 31, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06482749
Lead sponsor
Peking University First Hospital
Collaborators
The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medicial University, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital
Responsible party
Dong-Xin Wang (Professor, Peking University First Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 1, 2024
Start date
Jul 28, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 31, 2025

Study contacts

Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD
Contact
wangdongxin@hotmail.com
8610 83572784
Hao Kong, MD
Contact
konghao2438@126.com
8610 83575138
Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Peking University First Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion