ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06465901MARLINUpdated Jun 20, 2024

A Stratified, Multi-ARm, muLti-site Randomised Platform Trial Aiming to Reduce the INcidence of Post-operative SSI

An interventional study of Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower and Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn) in Surgical Site Infection, sponsored by University of Birmingham. Not yet recruiting at 7 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 5 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-20.

Sponsored by University of Birmingham · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10,092
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

MARLIN is a stratified, multi-arm, multi-stage factorial randomised platform trial aiming to reduce the incidence of post-operative surgical site infection (SSI).

Read the detailed description

MARLIN's primary objective is assess whether different interventions used at three different time points during the participant's operative care (pre-, intra- and post-operatively) can reduce SSI at 30 days in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. MARLIN will assess the clinical effectiveness in both clean-contaminated wounds and contaminated or dirty wounds and will assess the interventions being assessed individually and in combination.

Patients (adults and children) undergoing surgery with abdominal incision of at least ≥5cm, with an anticipated clean-contaminated or contaminated or dirty wound, undergoing emergency or elective, and open or laparoscopic surgery are eligible. Participants will be recruited from hospitals within the National Institute for Health and Care Research Global Surgery Unit (NIHR GSU) network (i.e. hospitals in Benin, Rwanda, Ghana, India, Mexico, Nigeria, South Africa).

Interventions will be introduced at the preoperative window, intra-operatively and postoperatively as it is not yet known which if any of these timed intervention periods are most effective. It is planned that only one intervention will be introduced in each window. This format will allow testing for interaction between interventions including cumulated benefit. It will also enable unsuccessful interventions to be withdrawn and potentially substituted. This is a pragmatic design and wherever possible, standard care will be provided in the control arm.

After patient eligibility has been confirmed and informed consent has been obtained, patients will be randomised into the MARLIN trial by a member of the MARLIN research team at the site. Randomisation will occur within 72 hours prior to the patient's operation. Patients will be randomised dependent on which arms are available at the randomising site, and in which they consent to participate (i.e. it is possible for patients to 'opt out' of one or more of the intervention timepoints).

Patients may be randomised to receive:

  • Chlorhexidine Gluconate preoperative shower 2.0% - 4.0% (e.g. hibiscrub) or standard preoperative preparation
  • Topical wound wash before closure (e.g. granudacyn) or standard intraoperative preparation
  • Dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC) wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed sorbact) or standard post-operative wound care

The randomisation ratio at each timepoint will be 1:1 between the intervention and control in the first instance, although if and when multiple intervention arms are open, the ratio may change with agreement of the data monitoring committee (DMC), with reduced randomisation into the control arm due to pooling. Eligible participants will be randomised to receive some or all of the trial interventions; sites will opt-in to each treatment depending on local deliverability, which will be reflected in the randomisation system. Randomisation will occur around the time of pre-operative assessment.

Sample size:

An internal pilot will be carried out for each intervention within the study. For each pilot, Internal pilots of 100 participants per intervention, will be undertaken to assess deliverability, safety, compliance and participant acceptability. Internal pilots will be undertaken in at least two countries for any given intervention to assess generalisability. Interventions will then be made available across the wider Global Surgery network.

For the clean-contaminated stratum, the maximum sample size required for a 3-stage design, with control SSI rate of 16%, two-sided overall alpha of 0.043, overall power of 0.86, and 20% relative reduction (3.2% absolute reduction) with 5% lost to follow up, would be 6006 participants for all 3 questions as a factorial design. As the second and third treatment will start after the first stage interim analysis of the first intervention, 7544 participants are required. 8196 participants are required if the first intervention works and leads to lower SSI rate.

For the contaminated/dirty stratum, the maximum sample size required for a 3-stage design, with control SSI rate of 30%, two-sided overall alpha of 0.043, power of 0.86 and 30% relative reduction (9% absolute reduction) with 10% lost to follow up, would require 1342 participants for all 3 questions as a factorial design. As the second and third treatment will start after first stage interim analysis of the first intervention, 1596 are required participants. 1896 participants are required if the first intervention works and leads to lower SSI rate.

Multistage analysis:

For the clean-contaminated group there will be two interim analyses, the first after 1824 participants and the second at interim analysis at 3126 for each of the questions. For the contaminated/dirty group, the first interim will happen at 372 participants, and the second at 638 participants.

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with at least one abdominal incision that is ≥5cm (open or laparoscopic extraction site), with an anticipated clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty surgical wound.
  • Patients undergoing emergency (surgery on an unplanned admission) or elective (surgery on a planned admission) operations.
  • Any operative indication for abdominal surgery (excluding caesarean section; see exclusion criteria).
  • Patient able and willing to provide written informed consent (signature or a fingerprint) prior to surgery (including emergency cases).
  • Patients aged 5 years and over. ( Each country will decide the lower (and upper, if applicable according to local regulations age limit for the trial. This will be dependent on country-specific regulatory approvals. Age eligibility will vary by country.) Patient Exclusion Criteria

    • Patient unable to complete post-operative follow-up (i.e., will not be contactable after discharge).
    • Patients undergoing clean surgical procedures.
02

Conditions studied

  • Surgical Site Infection

Keywords

  • surgery
  • global surgery
  • SSI
  • surgical site infection
03

In context

Surgical Wound Infection

745 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound Infection; 151 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10,092 is above the median of 200 across 581 interventional studies indexed under Surgical Wound Infection.

Browse Surgical Wound Infection studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Birmingham is the lead sponsor of 182 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with at least one abdominal incision that is ≥5cm (open or laparoscopic extraction site), with an anticipated clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty surgical wound. Definitions and examples of contamination are given in Table 1.
  • Patients undergoing emergency (surgery on an unplanned admission) or elective (surgery on a planned admission) operations.
  • Any operative indication for abdominal surgery (excluding caesarean section; see exclusion criteria).
  • Patient able and willing to provide written (signature or a fingerprint) prior to surgery (including emergency cases).
  • Patients aged 5 years and over. (This criteria MUST be made country-specific. Each country will decide the lower (and upper, if applicable according to local regulations age limit for the trial. This will be dependent on country-specific regulatory approvals. Age eligibility will vary by country.)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient unable to complete post-operative follow-up (i.e., will not be contactable after discharge).
  • Patients undergoing clean surgical procedures.
  • Patients undergoing an obstetrics procedure, including caesarean sections.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
10,092 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention: Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower

    Chlorhexidine Gluconate preoperative shower (e.g. hibiscrub) The participant may prepare themselves by undertaking whole-body disinfection with Chlorhexidine Gluconate. On two occasions, usually the day before and the day of the operation, the participant, should wash their whole body. Research teams will remind the participant that they must complete the pre-operative washes before they arrive at theatre. Finally the whole body should be rinsed and dried thoroughly.

    Other: Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower

  • Active comparator
    Comparator: Standard preoperative preparation

    Standard of care means whatever pre-operative cleansing is mandated according to local hospital policy.

    Other: Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower

  • Experimental
    Intervention: Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn)

    Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) topical wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn)

    Other: Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn)

  • Active comparator
    Comparator: Standard intraoperative preparation

    Standard of care means whatever irrigation of the wound site is mandated according to local hospital policy.

    Other: Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn)

  • Experimental
    Intervention: DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact)

    Leukomed Sorbact (Essity), is a sterile, single-use, bacteria-binding, adhesive-bordered wound dressing. It is used to prevent SSI in closed surgical wounds that have dry to low exudate.

    Other: DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact)

  • Active comparator
    Comparator: Standard post-operative wound care

    Standard of care means whatever dressing of the wound site is mandated according to local hospital policy (including no dressing). Centres mandating an active wound dressing will be excluded from the trial.

    Other: DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact)

Interventions

  • OtherChlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower

    Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower

  • OtherIntraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn)

    Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn)

  • OtherDACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact)

    DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Surgical site infection

    The primary outcome is surgical site infection (SSI) within 30 days post-surgery, defined according to Centre for Disease Control criteria collected using an adapted, validated Wound Healing questionnaire (TALON).

    Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Surgical site infection

    SSI at or prior to discharge from hospital

    Time frame: At or prior to discharge from hospital, usually within approximately 7 days of surgery

  2. Mortality

    Mortality (and likely cause)

    Time frame: Within 30-days post-surgery

  3. Length of hospital stay

    Length of hospital stay for index admission

    Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery

  4. Return to normal activities

    Return to normal activities (e.g. work, school, or family duties)

    Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery

  5. Unplanned wound opening

    Unplanned wound opening (i.e. not relating to necessary re-intervention)

    Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery

  6. Re-operation for SSI

    Re-operation for SSI

    Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery

07

Study locations

7 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Hospital-level data will not be released or published. Country-level analyses will only be conducted with permission of lead investigators from each participating country. Local investigators may access their data across their country to perform country-level analyses (all participating hospitals should consent to their data being used in this way).

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06465901
Collaborators
Kigali University Teaching Hospital, Université d'Abomey-Calavi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 20, 2024
Start date
Sep 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 20, 2024

Study contacts

Rachel Lillywhite
Contact
r.e.lillywhite@bham.ac.uk
+44 (0)121 415 9103
Divya Kapoor
Contact
d.kapoor@bham.ac.uk
+44 (0)121 415 9103
Thomas Pinkney
principal investigator · University of Birmingham

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion