ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06447298COELIOCOMUpdated Oct 16, 2024

Evaluation of the Satisfaction of Parents Accompanying Children Who Have Undergone Laparoscopic Surgery

An observational study in Parent's Satisfaction, Pediatric Surgery and Children Laparoscopic Surgery, sponsored by University Hospital, Brest. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-16.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Brest · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

An increasing number of surgeries are being performed using laparoscopic techniques. This approach significantly reduces postoperative pain and speeds up recovery. Additionally, the resulting scars are smaller compared to open surgeries. This study evaluates the quality of care and communication satisfaction among parents of children undergoing laparoscopic surgery in the pediatric surgery department of Brest. The primary goal is to assess parental satisfaction with communication during the procedure. Parents of children who have undergone laparoscopic surgery will be invited to participate. Participants will complete a satisfaction questionnaire the day after surgery and participate in a follow-up phone interview 7 to 9 days post-surgery, incorporating the child's opinion if possible.

Read the detailed description

Laparoscopic surgery, also known as laparoscopy and thoracoscopy, is increasingly used in pediatric surgery. This technique involves performing procedures through small incisions using miniaturized instruments and a camera, allowing precise, real-time operation. Laparoscopy offers several advantages over traditional open surgery, such as reduced surgical trauma, shorter recovery times, smaller scars, and lower risks of complications like infections and bleeding. Despite these benefits, research on patient experience with laparoscopy is limited, particularly regarding communication between patients and healthcare teams. This study aims to assess the satisfaction of parents whose children undergo laparoscopic surgery, focusing on communication and care quality. Previous studies indicate that patient satisfaction is a critical independent measure of care quality, not necessarily linked to clinical outcomes. Enhancing patient satisfaction can also reduce postoperative complications and improve recovery.

Using a custom satisfaction questionnaire based on the standardized and validated PedsQL generic care satisfaction questionnaire, this study will evaluate parental satisfaction with communication and care regarding their child's laparoscopic surgery. Parents will complete a satisfaction questionnaire the day after surgery and participate in a follow-up phone interview 7 to 9 days post-surgery, considering the child's input if possible.Using a Likert scale, each of the 20 items in the questionnaire will be evaluated with a score between 0 (not at all satisfied) and 5 (totally satisfied). Then the sum of the scores for each item will be calculated to obtain an overall score between 0 (not at all satisfied) and 100 (totally satisfied).

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate parental satisfaction with communication after their child's laparoscopic surgery by averaging the satisfaction scores from the initial post-laparoscopy questionnaire and the follow-up telephone interview (scored from 0 to 100).

For secondary objectives, responses to open-ended questions during the telephone interview will be qualitatively analyzed to gain insights into specific aspects of the parental experience with laparoscopy. The quality of care will be assessed using scores from specific items on the questionnaires related to care quality. Additionally, the study will analyze the duration of hospitalization to explore any correlation with parental satisfaction. The evolution of satisfaction over time will be assessed by comparing initial satisfaction scores with short-term satisfaction scores obtained during the follow-up interview. This comparison aims to identify any changes in satisfaction levels, particularly concerning the post-discharge period. All data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics for frequency and mean scores, with further analysis conducted using the software Prism to ensure robustness and validity of the findings.

At the end of this study, investigators hope to identify areas for improvement in surgical care and communication, aiming to enhance the postoperative quality of life for pediatric patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parent's Satisfaction
  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Children Laparoscopic Surgery
  • Coelioscopy
  • Communication

Browse trials for

03

In context

Communication

198 studies on the registry are indexed under Communication; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 100 across 27 observational studies indexed under Communication.

Browse Communication studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Brest is the lead sponsor of 600 studies on the registry; 135 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Parents accompanying children undergoing laparoscopic surgery in the paediatric department in Brest.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Accompanying parents of children from 0 to 17 years of age
  • Accompanying parents of children treated by one of the following laparoscopic procedures: laparoscopy and thoracoscopy, laparoscopies requiring a mini-laparotomy for extraction of the part, and laparoscopies carried out on an outpatient basis.
  • No objection from the parent accompanying the child

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parents who are minors
  • Parents under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship) or deprived of liberty
  • Need for intraoperative conversion.
  • Insufficient knowledge of the French language to complete the post-laparoscopy satisfaction questionnaire.
  • Not affiliated to the social security system.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Parents accompanying children

    Parents accompanying children aged 0 to 17 who have undergone laparoscopic surgery in the paediatric surgery department in Brest.

    Other: Satisfaction questionnaires

Interventions

  • OtherSatisfaction questionnaires

    Use of a post-laparoscopy satisfaction questionnaire designed to be adapted to the context of laparoscopic surgery. This post-laparoscopy questionnaire was inspired by the PedsQL generic care satisfaction questionnaire, a standardised and validated questionnaire.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Parent satisfaction score

    Mean of the 2 scores on the post-laparoscopy satisfaction questionnaires at inclusion and during the telephone interview (from 0 not at all satisfied to 100 totally satisfied). Using a Likert scale, each of the 20 items in the questionnaire will be evaluated with a score between 0 (not at all satisfied) and 5 (totally satisfied). Then the sum of the scores for each item will be calculated to obtain an overall score between 0 (not at all satisfied) and 100 (totally satisfied)

    Time frame: day of inclusion and 7 to 9 days after laparoscopic surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Parent satisfaction

    Responses to open questions about laparoscopy during the telephone interview

    Time frame: 7 to 9 days after laparoscopic surgery

  2. Quality of care

    Independent analysis of scores on quality of care items

    Time frame: day of inclusion and 7 to 9 days after laparoscopic surgery

  3. Parent satisfaction

    Comparison of initial satisfaction (paper post-laparoscopy satisfaction questionnaire at inclusion) with short-term satisfaction (telephone call post-laparoscopy satisfaction questionnaire between the 7th and 9th day after laparoscopic surgery).

    Time frame: day of inclusion and 7 to 9 days after laparoscopic surgery

  4. Quality of care

    Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: about 2 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU Brest
    Brest, Brest 29200, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All collected data that underlie results in a publication

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Data will be available beginning five years and ending fifteen years following the final study report completion.

Access criteria: Data access requests will be reviewed by the internal committee of Brest UH. Requestors will be required to sign and complete a data access agreement.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jul 2024 to primary completion in Sep 2024, 2 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 3, 2024
First posted
Jun 7, 2024
StartActual
Jul 22, 2024
Primary completionActual
Sep 23, 2024
CompletionActual
Sep 23, 2024
Last update
Oct 16, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06447298
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 7, 2024
Start date
Jul 22, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 23, 2024
Completion
Sep 23, 2024
Last update
Oct 16, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion