CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT06447194Updated Jul 31, 2025

Effect of RECK in Posterior Spinal Fusion

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Ropivacaine, Epinephrine, Clonidine, and Ketorolac Injection Cocktail and Placebo in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Degenerative Disc Disease and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis, sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 88 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-31.

Sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Study was not feasible due to logistical and implementation challenges. No participants were enrolled and the study will not proceed further.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 88 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

"RECK" is a combination of local anesthesia medications, used for the purpose of pain control. RECK is an acronym which stands for Ropivacaine, Epinephrine, Clonidine, and Ketorolac. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of RECK local injectable anesthetic in the setting of posterior spinal fusion. Our specific aims are the following.

Primary aim: to investigate the effect of RECK local injectable anesthetic on postoperative VAS pain scores.

Secondary aims: to investigate of effect of RECK injection on postoperative opioid consumption and hospital length of stay.

Hypothesis: RECK injection will significantly decrease postoperative VAS pain score, opioid consumption, and hospital length of stay compared to placebo controls.

Read the detailed description

Patients will be randomized into two groups. Intraoperatively, they will be given either 1) a 50 mL RECK (ropivacaine, epinephrine, clonidine, and ketorolac) cocktail containing 123 mg ropivacaine, 0.25 mg epinephrine, 0.04 mg clonidine, and 15 mg ketorolac into the paraspinal musculature and subdermal space surrounding the operative site once the fascia is closed (intervention group), or 2) a 50 mL injection of saline (control group). RECK is used for pain control and will be administered by fellowship-trained orthopaedic spine surgeons. All patients will have a patient-controlled analgesia pump initiated shortly after surgery, with routine postoperative care and observation from nurses, pain management, and orthopedic surgeons and residents.

02

Conditions studied

  • Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
  • Degenerative Disc Disease
  • Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
  • Degenerative Disease

Keywords

  • Spine Surgery
  • Lumbar Fusion
  • Pain Control
  • Opioid Utilization
  • Local Anesthesia
  • RECK
  • R.E.C.K.
  • Ropivacaine
  • Epinephrine
  • Clonidine
  • Ketorolac
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
03

In context

Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

464 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral Disc Degeneration; 98 are open to participants now.

Browse Intervertebral Disc Degeneration studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Maryland, Baltimore is the lead sponsor of 687 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.

Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 63 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 88 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-88 years old
  • Undergoing spinal fusion at 1-3 lumbar levels via a posterior approach.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision surgeries
  • Surgeries indicated for trauma, tumor, or infection
  • Preoperative history of moderate to severe hepatic, renal, cardiac, or psychiatric illness
  • Known hypersensitivity to any of the RECK components
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention (RECK)

    The arm of patients who will be administered "RECK" local anesthesia cocktail: Ropivacaine 0.125g Clonidine 80 mcg Epinephrine 0.5 mg Ketorolac 30 mg In sterile water 73 mL (total volume of compound is 100 mL) Given through paraspinal muscle injection once intraoperatively.

    Drug: Ropivacaine, Epinephrine, Clonidine, and Ketorolac Injection Cocktail

  • Placebo comparator
    Control Group (Placebo)

    The arm of patients who will be administered a placebo injection: 100 mL Normal Saline Given through paraspinal muscle injection once intraoperatively.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugRopivacaine, Epinephrine, Clonidine, and Ketorolac Injection Cocktail

    Please refer to description for interventional group.

    Also known as: RECK

  • OtherPlacebo

    100mL paraspinal normal saline injection intraoperatively, once.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative VAS Pain Scores

    Primary aim: to investigate the effect of RECK local injectable anesthetic on postoperative VAS pain scores. VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) measures pain intensity. The VAS is a 10cm line with two end points representing 0 ("No pain") and 10 ("Pain as bad as it could be"). The patient is asked to rate their pain by placing a marker on the line. A lower score (thus closer to "no pain") is a better outcome.

    Time frame: 2, 4, and 6 hours immediately postoperatively, then repeating once daily through hospital admission (an average of 4 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Opioid Utilization

    Secondary aims: to investigate of effect of RECK injection on postoperative opioid consumption.

    Time frame: Postoperatively day 1, then repeating once daily through hospital admission (an average of 4 days)

  2. Hospital Length of Stay

    Secondary aims: to investigate of effect of RECK injection on hospital length of stay.

    Time frame: Up to 2 weeks (an average of 4 days)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Maryland Medical Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 31, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06447194
Lead sponsor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Responsible party
Steven Ludwig (Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland, Baltimore) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 7, 2024
Start date
Oct 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 31, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion