CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06429163WINPLEXUpdated Jan 6, 2026Results posted

Pre-incisional Wound INfiltration and Hypogastric PLEXus Block Using Ropivacaine in Laparoscopic Myomectomy

An interventional study of Troacar site infiltration and Superior hypogastric plexus block in Fibroid Uterus and Pain, Postoperative, sponsored by Saint Petersburg State University, Russia. Completed at 1 site in Russia. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-06.

Sponsored by Saint Petersburg State University, Russia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
207
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess an impact of laparoscopic superior hypogastric plexus (SHP) block combined with preemptive troacar site infiltration on postoperative pain intensity following laparoscopic myomectomy.

Read the detailed description

Patients randomized into 3 groups with a target ratio of 1:1:1 were included in the study: group 1 received standard systemic analgesia combined with troacar site infiltration and laparoscopic SHP block; group 2 received troacar site infiltration without SHP block; control group (group 3) received standard systemic analgesia alone. The primary endpoint was presented by assessing pain intensity using the numeric rating scale (NRS) at 4 hours postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included NRS dynamics at 2, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively, time to first mobilization, opioid use, and pain quality assessment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fibroid Uterus
  • Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

  • Uterine fibroid
  • Laparoscopic myomectomy
  • Postoperative pain
  • Pre-incisional infiltration
  • Hypogastric plexus block
  • EQ-5D questionnaire
  • Picker questionnaire
  • The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-R)
03

In context

Leiomyoma

490 studies on the registry are indexed under Leiomyoma; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 207 is above the median of 62 across 345 interventional studies indexed under Leiomyoma.

Browse Leiomyoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Saint Petersburg State University, Russia is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged ≥18 years.
  • Indication for laparoscopic myomectomy due to ≥6 cm fibroid(s) or multiple fibroids.
  • Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • FIGO type 7 subserosal pedunculated myoma.
  • Conversion to laparotomy.
  • Severe presacral adhesions preventing safe SHPB.
  • Concomitant pelvic or abdominal surgery.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
207 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Standart analgesia

    Standard postoperative analgesia (systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol, opioid analgetics).

    Procedure: Troacar site infiltration · Procedure: Superior hypogastric plexus block

  • Active comparator
    Troacar site infiltration

    Troacar site infiltration without SHP block

    Procedure: Troacar site infiltration · Procedure: Superior hypogastric plexus block

  • Experimental
    SHP block

    Standard systemic analgesia combined with troacar site infiltration and laparoscopic SHP block

    Procedure: Troacar site infiltration · Procedure: Superior hypogastric plexus block

Interventions

  • ProcedureTroacar site infiltration

    Infiltration of the anterior abdominal wall is performed with placebo or 0.2% ropivacaine diluted with physiological saline on a syringe in the volume of 20 ml - 5 ml for each incision. The drug is injected with a 22-gauge needle at a 90-degree angle.

  • ProcedureSuperior hypogastric plexus block

    At the beginning of the operation the camera is used to visualise the area of the promontorium. Next, a 1 mm laparoscopic puncture needle is inserted through a trocar in the suprapubic region and plunged into the upper part of the formed dome to a depth of no more than 1 cm. After positioning the needle retroperitoneally, an aspiration test is performed to prevent intravascular injection. Then, 20 ml of placebo or 0.2% ropivacaine diluted with physiological saline is slowly injected. At the end of the procedure, the retroperitoneal space swollen by the local anaesthetic is visualised in the promontorium.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Score

    Pain syndrome intensity 4 hours after laparoscopic myomectomy. The NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) score from 0-10 is a tool for self-reporting pain intensity, where 0 equals no pain and 10 equals the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: 4 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Score Dynamics

    The NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) score from 0-10 is a tool for self-reporting pain intensity, where 0 equals no pain and 10 equals the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: 2, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively

  2. Mobilization

    Timing of post-surgery mobilization (hours after surgery)

    Time frame: Early postoperative period

  3. Opioid Use

    Number of opioid administrations

    Time frame: Postoperative period, up to 48 hours

  4. Pain Localisation (Superficial/Deep)

    Patients were asked to characterize the predominant type of postoperative pain using a standardized questionnaire. Superficial pain was defined as somatic pain (localized, similar to muscle soreness), while deep pain was defined as visceral (diffuse, dull, similar to menstrual pain). Responses were used to evaluate the visceral pain component after surgery. Participants were allowed to report more than one type of postoperative pain.

    Time frame: Within 48 hours after surgery

07

Results

Posted Jan 6, 2026
Limitations and caveats
Patient selection followed a per-protocol design rather than an intention-to-treat approach. This strategy was chosen deliberately, as the aim was not only to assess the efficacy and safety of the proposed technique, but also to refine its application during the surgical learning curve. Such a design ensured high group homogeneity and allowed evaluation of the method under optimal procedural conditions. However, it limited the generalizability of the findings to a broader patient population, par

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSHP BlockTroacar Site InfiltrationStandart Analgesia (Control Group)
Started696969
Completed666567
Not completed342
Withdrew: Uterine fibroid type 7111
Withdrew: Severe adhesions121
Withdrew: Conversion to laparotomy010
Withdrew: Concomitant procedure100

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain Score

Pain syndrome intensity 4 hours after laparoscopic myomectomy. The NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) score from 0-10 is a tool for self-reporting pain intensity, where 0 equals no pain and 10 equals the worst pain imaginable.

Time frame:
4 hours postoperatively
Reported as:
Median · NRS score (0-10 scale)
Pain Score
NRS score (0-10 scale)SHP blockTroacar site infiltrationStandart analgesia (control group)
Pain Score2 (2.0 to 3.0)2 (2.0 to 4.0)4 (3.0 to 4.0)
SecondaryPain Score Dynamics

The NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) score from 0-10 is a tool for self-reporting pain intensity, where 0 equals no pain and 10 equals the worst pain imaginable.

Time frame:
2, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
Reported as:
Median · NRS score (0-10 scale)
Pain Score Dynamics
NRS score (0-10 scale)SHP blockTroacar site infiltrationStandart analgesia (control group)
2 hours postoperatively2.5 (2.0 to 4.0)3.0 (2.0 to 4.0)4.0 (3.0 to 5.0)
6 hours postoperatively2.0 (2.0 to 3.0)2.0 (2.0 to 3.0)3.0 (2.0 to 4.0)
8 hours postoperatively2.0 (1.5 to 2.0)2.0 (2.0 to 3.0)2.0 (2.0 to 3.5)
12 hours postoperatively2.0 (1.0 to 2.0)2.0 (2.0 to 2.0)2.0 (2.0 to 3.0)
24 hours postoperatively2.0 (0.5 to 2.0)2.0 (1.0 to 2.0)2.0 (1.0 to 2.5)
SecondaryMobilization

Timing of post-surgery mobilization (hours after surgery)

Time frame:
Early postoperative period
Reported as:
Median · Hours
Mobilization
HoursSHP blockTroacar site infiltrationStandart analgesia (control group)
Mobilization5.0 (4.0 to 7.0)7.0 (4.0 to 13.0)7.0 (5.0 to 11.5)
SecondaryOpioid Use

Number of opioid administrations

Time frame:
Postoperative period, up to 48 hours
Reported as:
Number · doses
Opioid Use
dosesSHP blockTroacar site infiltrationStandart analgesia (control group)
Opioid Use31422
SecondaryPain Localisation (Superficial/Deep)

Patients were asked to characterize the predominant type of postoperative pain using a standardized questionnaire. Superficial pain was defined as somatic pain (localized, similar to muscle soreness), while deep pain was defined as visceral (diffuse, dull, similar to menstrual pain). Responses were used to evaluate the visceral pain component after surgery. Participants were allowed to report more than one type of postoperative pain.

Time frame:
Within 48 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Pain Localisation (Superficial/Deep)
ParticipantsSHP blockTroacar site infiltrationStandart analgesia (control group)
Superficial pain301521
Deep (visceral) pain415353

Adverse events

Collected over Intraoperatively and within 48 after surgery. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
SHP Block0/66 (0%)0/66 (0%)0/66 (0%)
Troacar Site Infiltration0/65 (0%)0/65 (0%)0/65 (0%)
Standart Analgesia (Control Group)0/67 (0%)0/67 (0%)0/67 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)SHP BlockTroacar Site InfiltrationStandart AnalgesiaTotal
Median44.4 (39.1 to 46.9)44.1 (40.1 to 46.7)42.7 (38.9 to 44.8)43.4 (39.0 to 46.4)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SHP BlockTroacar Site InfiltrationStandart AnalgesiaTotal
Female666567198
Male0000
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)SHP BlockTroacar Site InfiltrationStandart AnalgesiaTotal
Count of participants———0
Operative time, min
Operative time, min(min)SHP BlockTroacar Site InfiltrationStandart AnalgesiaTotal
Median97.5 (75 to 130)95 (68 to 120)95 (75 to 137.5)96 (75 to 117)
Blood loss, ml
Blood loss, ml(ml)SHP BlockTroacar Site InfiltrationStandart AnalgesiaTotal
Median115 (50 to 200)100 (50 to 150)100 (50 to 200)105 (50 to 155)
Body mass index, kg/m^2
Body mass index, kg/m^2(kg/m2)SHP BlockTroacar Site InfiltrationStandart AnalgesiaTotal
Median24.4 (21.9 to 28.4)25.1 (21.5 to 28.8)24.1 (20.9 to 27.6)24.5 (21.4 to 26.4)
Size of the largest myoma, mm
Size of the largest myoma, mm(mm)SHP BlockTroacar Site InfiltrationStandart AnalgesiaTotal
Median68 (55 to 80)69 (56 to 84)70 (62 to 80)69 (58 to 79)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Saint Petersburg State University Hospital
    Saint Petersburg, Russia
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 12, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06429163
Lead sponsor
Saint Petersburg State University, Russia
Responsible party
Nikita Kharlov (Head of Gynecology department, Saint Petersburg State University, Russia) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 24, 2024
Start date
May 14, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 26, 2025
Completion
Jan 26, 2025
Results posted
Jan 6, 2026
Last update
Jan 6, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion