ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06426225Updated Aug 19, 2024

Spinal Or General Anesthesia For Umblical Hernia Surgery

An interventional study of General Anesthesia and Spinal Aneshtesia in Umbilical Hernia, Spinal Aneshtesia and General Anesthesia, sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-19.

Sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, the investigators compared spinal anesthesia under ketofol (ketamine-propofol combination) sedation with general anesthesia in terms of intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics, respiratory parameters and cost in patients undergoing umbilical hernia operation. the investigator aimed to provide the most appropriate and hemodynamically stable option for the patient, to decrease the complication rates and to reduce the associated costs.

Read the detailed description

This study was carried out at the Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital Operating Room, after receiving ethics committee approval.Preoperative evaluation was performed before the operation in cases undergoing elective umbilical hernia surgery.Complications and side effects are explained in detail.Verbal and written consents were obtained from the subjects who agreed to participate in the study.In patients undergoing umbilical hernia surgery, general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia under propofol and ketamine (ketamine-propofol combination) sedation were compared in terms of intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics, aldrete score, pain score, respiratory parameters, and cost. The patients, who had fasted for 8 hours before the operation, were taken to the operating room without premedication.

In all cases, a peripheral venous catheter cannulated on the dorsal part of the hand (20G, Plusflon i.v. Cannula, India) .Standard monitoring was applied.

Group1. As premedication 0.03mg/kg midazolam was administered . For spinal anesthesia, 15 mg heavy-bupivacaine, sedation was provided with ketofol.

ketamine:propofol mixture was prepared as 1:1 5mg/ml propofol and 5mg/ml ketamine

1 mg/kg ketofol administered i.v. Group2 . As premedication 0.03mg/kg midazolam was administered.In general anesthesia to all patients after induction 3 mg/kg propofol, 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium and 1 mcg/kg fentanyl Bispectral index and non-invasive blood pressure was monitored, a urinary catheter was placed. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and fentanyl to keep BIS values between 40-60.

02

Conditions studied

  • Umbilical Hernia
  • Spinal Aneshtesia
  • General Anesthesia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hernia, Umbilical

67 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Umbilical; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 44 is below the median of 66 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Umbilical.

Browse Hernia, Umbilical studies →

Lead sponsor

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent is the lead sponsor of 443 studies on the registry; 111 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who would undergo Umbilical hernia surgery were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • who do not accept the procedure
  • serious cardiovasculer disease ,renal, hematological (bleeding diathesis, under anticoagulant therapy, those with value below 10 g/dl) disease, hepatic disease, cerebrovascular, neurological or psychiatric diseases,
  • those who are for spinal anesthesia,
  • Those who are allergic to one of the local anesthetics to be used, with drug and alcohol addiction,
  • pregnant or breastfeeding
  • using drugs and analgesics effective on the central nervous system were excluded from the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    General Anesthesia

    As premedication 0.03mg/kg midazolam was administered. During general anesthesia, 3 mg/kg propofol, 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium and 1 mcg/kg fentanyl were administered to all patients for induction.

    Other: General Anesthesia

  • Active comparator
    Spinal Anesthesia

    As premedication 0.03mg/kg midazolam was administered. After premedication Spinal Anesthesia applied. Group will be sedated with ketofol after spinal anesthesia. Ketamine:propofol mixture will be prepared as 1:1 5mg/ml propofol and 5mg/ml ketamine. Surgery will begin when the Ramsey sedation scale reaches 3.

    Other: Spinal Aneshtesia

Interventions

  • OtherGeneral Anesthesia

    General Anesthesia Applied Group 2 Patients.

  • OtherSpinal Aneshtesia

    Spinal Anesthesia and Ketofol Sedation Applied Group 1 Patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Heart Rate

    During Perioperative Period Heart rate was measured

    Time frame: preoperative 0. minute, intraoperative 10.minute, intraoperative 20.minute, intraoperative 30.minute, Postoperative 0.minute, Postoperative 10.minute, Postoperative 20.minute, Postoperative 30.minute

  2. systolic blood pressure

    non invasive blood pressure measurement

    Time frame: preoperative 0. minute, intraoperative 10.minute, intraoperative 20.minute, intraoperative 30.minute, Postoperative 0.minute, Postoperative 10.minute, Postoperative 20.minute, Postoperative 30.minute

  3. diastolic blood pressure

    non invasive blood pressure measurement

    Time frame: preoperative 0. minute, intraoperative 10.minute, intraoperative 20.minute, intraoperative 30.minute, Postoperative 0.minute, Postoperative 10.minute, Postoperative 20.minute, Postoperative 30.minute

  4. mean arterial blood pressure

    non invasive blood pressure measurement

    Time frame: preoperative 0. minute, intraoperative 10.minute, intraoperative 20.minute, intraoperative 30.minute, Postoperative 0.minute, Postoperative 10.minute, Postoperative 20.minute, Postoperative 30.minute

  5. hospital stay

    Length of hospital stay was recorded.

    Time frame: From hospital admission to discharge

  6. Cost

    Bill amount during hospitalization

    Time frame: From hospital admission to discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative NRS

    postoperative numeric rating scale was evaluated, 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable

    Time frame: Postoperative 30.minute, Postoperative 12. hour

  2. Postoperative Aldrete Score

    Postoperative Aldrete score was evaluated.

    Time frame: Postoperative first 1 hour

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
    Ankara, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • KROBOT, R. i PREMUŽIĆ, J. (2013). Comparison of general and spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair. Periodicum biologorum, 115 (2), 225-229. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/105984
  • Germano P, Siboni S, Milito P, Mautone G, Resta M, Bonavina L. Ventral hernia repair under neuraxial anesthesia. Eur Surg. 2022;54(1):54-58. doi: 10.1007/s10353-021-00731-x. Epub 2021 Jul 20. PubMed 34306042 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06426225
Responsible party
Nargiz Mammadova (Principal Investigator, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 23, 2024
Start date
May 15, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2024
Completion
Aug 15, 2024
Last update
Aug 19, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion