ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT06422312Updated Apr 4, 2025

A Study Comparing a Disposable Flexible Cystoscope With Reusable Scopes in Adult Patients.

An interventional study of Cystoscopy with RedPine flexible disposable cystoscope and Cystoscopy with standard of care flexible reusable scope in Bladder Cancer, Bladder Stone and Bladder Outlet Obstruction, sponsored by Guangzhou Red Pine Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.. Withdrawn at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 120 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-04.

Sponsored by Guangzhou Red Pine Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Why this study was withdrawn
A change in marketing strategy resulted in a decision to not complete the trial.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 120 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will compare the time required for a cystoscopy procedure in adult participants using the Redpine® Rflex endo(trademark) High-Definition Cystoscope or the site's standard of care reusable flexible cystoscope in participants requiring urethral stent removal.

Read the detailed description

This randomized study will compare the cumulative procedure time between cystoscopy performed with the Redpine® Rflex endo(trademark) High-Definition Cystoscope and the site's standard of care reusable flexible cystoscope in adult study participants requiring cystoscopy for visualization of and/or intervention on the urinary bladder. The study will evaluate the user experience and product performance during cystoscopic procedures. Participant experience, tolerance to the procedure, and any differences in adverse events between disposable and reusable scope will be evaluated. The hypothesis is that the RedPine cystoscope will perform as well as reusable scopes and will have a shorter cumulative procedure time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bladder Cancer
  • Bladder Stone
  • Bladder Outlet Obstruction
  • Renal Stone
  • Renal Disease

Keywords

  • cystoscopy
03

In context

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

1,798 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; 445 are open to participants now.

Browse Urinary Bladder Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Guangzhou Red Pine Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 120 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female, aged at least 18 years old
  2. Patient undergoing routine flexible cystoscopy
  3. No active urinary tract infection
  4. Subject is willing and able to sign and HIPAA authorization.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known unpassable urethral stricture
  2. Febrile patient with active urinary tract infection (UTI)
  3. Subjects with acute infection (acute urethritis, acute prostatitis, acute epididymitis)
  4. Subject with severe coagulopathy
  5. Subject is pregnant or female with reproductive capability who is unwilling to have a pre-procedure pregnancy test and use .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Participants in this arm will receive cystoscopy using the clinic's standard of care flexible reusable cystoscope of the urologist's choice.

    Device: Cystoscopy with standard of care flexible reusable scope

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Participants in this arm will receive cystoscopy using the Redpine® Rflex endoTMHD Cysto scope.

    Device: Cystoscopy with RedPine flexible disposable cystoscope

Interventions

  • DeviceCystoscopy with RedPine flexible disposable cystoscope

    Use of a disposable flexible cystoscope to visualize the urethra and bladder, take biopsies, and remove stents.

  • DeviceCystoscopy with standard of care flexible reusable scope

    Use of a reusable flexible cystoscope to visualize the urethra and bladder, take biopsies, and remove stents

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative Procedure Time

    To compare the Cumulative Procedure Time between cystoscopy performed with the Redpine® Rflex endo(trademark) High Definition (endoTMHD) Cysto scope and the site's Standard of Care reusable flexible cystoscope as measured by: * Scope preparation for procedure * Actual procedure time (insertion of cystoscope to complete bladder examination) and * Time to dispose of or prepare for reprocessing of cystoscopy equipment.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. User experience and product performance during cystoscopic procedures

    Physician satisfaction, rated on a five-point scale. Scale Name Very Difficult Very Easy Outcome Ease of insertion 1 5 5 = Better Ability to visualize anatomical landmarks and/or urothelium changes 1 5 5 = Better Perception of image quality 1 5 5 = Better Maneuverability in the bladder 1 5 5 = Better Overall Acceptability Yes/No

    Time frame: within 24 hours

  2. Participant comfort during the procedure

    Participants will be interviewed using a questionnaire. Pain Intensity Please respond to the question by marking one box. How would you rate your pain on average? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 No pain Worst imaginable pain

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  3. RedPine Cystoscope Conversion Rate

    Rate of conversion to a reusable cystoscope for those subjects randomized to the REDPINE cystoscope.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  4. Device Failure Rate

    Device failure leading to a serious adverse event (SAE), termination of the procedure, or conversion to a reusable cystoscope.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

Other outcomes

  1. Safety Endpoints

    Safety will be assessed based on the incidence rates of adverse events based on the seriousness and relatedness to the device and/or procedure. 1) All urologic adverse events, both device and procedure related, during the cystoscopy procedure through 7 (+/- 3) days post-procedure. The subject will be asked if they have had: 1. any signs or symptoms of a UTI 2. any untoward effects post-procedure, including by not limited to 1. gross hematuria last longer than 3 days post-procedure 2. pain with urination lasting longer than 3 days post-procedure 3. cloudy urine noted greater than one day post-procedure 4. fever/chills or a diagnosis of UTI or other illness within the time since the cystoscopic procedure. 2) All reported device and/or procedural related adverse events through 7 (+/- 3) days post- procedure 3) All Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) through 7 (+/- 3) days post-procedure

    Time frame: 4 to 10 days

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Pennsylvania State University
    Hersey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • University of Washington
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Samplaski MK, Jones JS. Two centuries of cystoscopy: the development of imaging, instrumentation and synergistic technologies. BJU Int. 2009 Jan;103(2):154-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08244.x. Epub 2008 Dec 8. PubMed 19076146 ↗
  • O'Sullivan DC, Chilton CP. Flexible cystoscopy. Br J Hosp Med. 1994 Apr 6-19;51(7):340-5. PubMed 8081563 ↗
  • Poulton LJ, Joyce AD. Flexible cystoscopy: Training and Assessment Guideline. Br Assoc Urol Nurses. 2012;(November).
  • Pillai PL, Sooriakumaran P. Flexible cystoscopy: a revolution in urological practice. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2009 Oct;70(10):583-5. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2009.70.10.44626. PubMed 19966704 ↗
  • Kadi N, Menezes P. ABC of flexible cystoscopy for junior trainee and general practitioner. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:593-6. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S20267. Epub 2011 Aug 19. PubMed 21887113 ↗
  • Steinberg. Cystoscopy in Bladder Carcinoma [Internet]. Medscape. 2015 [cited 2018 Jan 18]. Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1950345-overview
  • Doizi S, Kamphuis G, Giusti G, Palmero JL, Patterson JM, Proietti S, Straub M, de la Rosette J, Traxer O. First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible cystoscope dedicated to double-J stent removal (Isiris): a European prospective multicenter study. World J Urol. 2017 Aug;35(8):1269-1275. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1986-0. Epub 2016 Dec 17. PubMed 27988848 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2024; primary completion for Jan 2025, 3 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 15, 2024
First posted
May 20, 2024
StartEst.
Oct 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2025
CompletionEst.
Jul 2025
Last update
Apr 4, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06422312
Lead sponsor
Guangzhou Red Pine Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.
Responsible party
Yair Lotan, MD (Professor Vice Chair of Clinical Affairs Chief of Urologic Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 20, 2024
Start date
Oct 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 4, 2025

Study contacts

Yair Lotan, MD
principal investigator · UT Southwestern Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion