ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06401317CASITOAUpdated Aug 18, 2026

Corticosteroid Against Saline Injections for Thumb Osteoarthritis (CASITOA)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Saline Solution (NaCl 0,9%) and Triamcinolone Acetonide in Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières. Recruiting at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-18.

Sponsored by Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Thumb osteoarthritis or trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (TMO) is a common and painful form of hand arthritis that limits thumb mobility and hand function, affecting patients' quality of life. Although corticosteroids injections are a typical treatment, their effectiveness has been challenged, and side effects have been reported. Recent studies suggest that saline injections, usually considered inactive, might be a viable treatment option. The primary goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of saline injections versus corticosteroids injections in reducing TMO-related pain and improving hand function. In this study, 40 people with TMO will be randomly assigned to receive either a corticosteroids or a saline injection, without them or the doctors performing the injection knowing which one was administered (double blind). If saline injections prove more effective, they could provide a less harmful and cheaper therapeutic alternative for TMO patients.

Read the detailed description

Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (TMO) is one of the most painful, disabling and prevalent hand osteoarthritis. One of the most common treatments for TMO is an intra-articular corticosteroids injection. However, non-superiority of corticosteroids injection over placebo to reduce pain has also been reported for TMO and other types of osteoarthritis (knee, hip, or shoulder). Furthermore, adverse effects of corticosteroids injection such as subcutaneous atrophy, tendon ruptures, and articular cartilage damage have been reported. Given the uncertain relevance of corticosteroids injection as a therapeutic agent, it becomes imperative to consider alternative options. In fact, three systematic reviews suggest that saline injections may be a viable option for TMO or knee pain.

To investigate the hypothesis that saline injection is a more effective modality than corticosteroids injection for the treatment of TMO in terms of reducing TMO pain and improving hand function, we must undertake a large, randomized trial in real clinical settings to ensure the acquisition of high-quality evidence. This pilot project is a preparatory phase for a larger study aimed at comparing the effectiveness of saline and corticosteroids injections in treating TMO, focusing on pain reduction and functional improvements. The study design is a pragmatic, double-blind randomized trial, adhering to PRECIS-2 guidelines.

The pilot randomized controlled trial will assess the feasibility of a study by evaluating aspects such as recruitment capabilities, retention, and the success of blinding techniques for participants and clinicians. It will also identify potential challenges and gather preliminary data to support a funding application for the full-scale study. Recruitment and data collection are planned over a 12-month period, targeting 40 participants initially to refine procedures and validate the study's feasibility. Participants will be randomly assigned to treatment, and the clinicians delivering the intervention will be blinded to the content of the injections. The study's primary outcome will measure pain intensity using a numeric scale at multiple time points, while secondary outcomes include upper limb functional limitations using the QuickDASH scale. These will be measured at baseline, before treatment, and at follow-up, 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Corticosteroids
  • Feasibility
  • Blinding
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Saline
  • Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis
  • Intra-articular injection
  • Pragmatic trial
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

2,974 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 438 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 80 across 2,240 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières is the lead sponsor of 40 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • aged ≥18 years;
  • diagnosis of TMO was confirmed by X-ray interpreted by a radiologist;
  • suffering from pain at the base of the thumb;
  • the attending physician deems that an intra-articular injection would be beneficial, rather than opting for other types of intervention such as surgery
  • can read, understand and answer in either French or English.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having received one or more injections in the last 3 months or surgery on the affected thumb;
  • suffering from painful thumb caused by a trauma (e.g., fracture, sprain), rheumatoid arthritis, or De Quervain's tendonitis; and
  • being pregnant or breastfeeding; and
  • known allergies to any components of the solutions (triamcinolone acetonide, benzyl alcohol, carboxymethylcellulose sodium, hydrochloric acid, polysorbate, sodium chloride, or sodium hydroxide) or to iodinated contrast media.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Saline Injection

    A single injection of saline solution

    Drug: Saline Solution (NaCl 0,9%)

  • Active comparator
    Corticosteroid Injection

    Usual care, consisting on a single injection of corticosteroids

    Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide

Interventions

  • Ultrasound/fluoroscopy-guided intra-articular injection of 0.25ml of 0.9% saline solution.

    Also known as: Saline solution

  • Ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection 0.25ml (10 mg) of triamcinolone.

    Also known as: Corticosteroid

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of participant recruitment

    The number of participants recruited per week, raw and divided by those screened for eligibility and those deemed eligible

    Time frame: Through study completion (estimated time, 1 year)

  2. Rate of participants completing the follow-ups

    The number of participants completing the follow-ups at 1, 3, and 6 months, divided by those recruited

    Time frame: Through study completion (estimated time, 1 year)

  3. Success of blinded procedures for clinicians

    Success of blinded procedures for physicians will be by asking them by email after the injection to guess which treatment they administered. Three response categories for treatment guess: 'corticosteroid injection', 'saline injection', or 'I don't know'.

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours after each injection

  4. Success of blinded procedures for patients

    Success of blinded procedures for patients will be investigated by asking them to guess which treatment they will have received via the post-injection questionnaire. Three response categories for treatment guess are 'corticosteroid injection', 'saline injection', or 'I don't know', after the last follow-up).

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months after receiving the injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Trapeziometacarpal pain intensity

    Three types of pain intensity (current, on the average in the last 7 days, at its worst in the last 7 days) will be measured using a 0-10 rating scale (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain possible)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after injection

  2. QuickDASH questionnaire (short version of the 30-item Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand).

    11-item questionnaire assesses the level of physical function and symptoms among patients with upper limb musculoskeletal condition. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 and the higher it is, the more disabled is the patient.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after injection

  3. Concomitant analgesic use

    This will be captured using the Cumulative Analgesic Consumption Score (CACS), a tool that combines a qualitative assessment based on the World Health Organization analgesic ladder with a quantitative evaluation based on a score computed from the number of analgesics taken from each of three different categories: acetaminophen/NSAIDs, weak opioids, and strong opioids.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after injection

  4. Adverse events

    Side effects will be reported systematically by using a questionnaire with 5 items assessing the presence, type, frequency, severity and duration of injection-related adverse events.

    Time frame: 24 hours after the injection and at 1-month, 3-month- and 6-month post-injection.

Other outcomes

  1. Second injection

    The number of participants requesting a second injection with a different solution due to a perceived lack of efficacy, as well as the number of participants requesting a second injection with the same solution due to pain relapse will be compared between groups will be compared between groups (saline vs. cortisone)

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months after injection

  2. Arthroplasty

    The number of participants undergoing arthroplasty during the study period will also be compared between groups..

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months after injection

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal - Physiatry
    Montreal, Quebec H2W 1T6, Canada
    Recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal - Chirurgie plastique
    Montreal, Quebec H2X 0C1, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dahaghin S, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Ginai AZ, Pols HA, Hazes JM, Koes BW. Prevalence and pattern of radiographic hand osteoarthritis and association with pain and disability (the Rotterdam study). Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 May;64(5):682-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.023564. Epub 2004 Sep 16. PubMed 15374852 ↗
  • Hamasaki T, Laprise S, Harris PG, Bureau NJ, Gaudreault N, Ziegler D, Choiniere M. Efficacy of Nonsurgical Interventions for Trapeziometacarpal (Thumb Base) Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Dec;72(12):1719-1735. doi: 10.1002/acr.24084. Epub 2020 Nov 7. PubMed 31600038 ↗
  • Hamasaki T, Choiniere M, Harris PG, Bureau NJ, Gaudreault N, Patenaude N. Biopsychosocial factors associated with pain severity and hand disability in trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis and non-surgical management. J Hand Ther. 2023 Jul-Sep;36(3):647-657. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2022.10.001. Epub 2023 Mar 12. PubMed 36918308 ↗
  • Altman RD, Devji T, Bhandari M, Fierlinger A, Niazi F, Christensen R. Clinical benefit of intra-articular saline as a comparator in clinical trials of knee osteoarthritis treatments: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Oct;46(2):151-159. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 Apr 27. PubMed 27238876 ↗
  • Ayub S, Kaur J, Hui M, Espahbodi S, Hall M, Doherty M, Zhang W. Efficacy and safety of multiple intra-articular corticosteroid injections for osteoarthritis-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Apr 6;60(4):1629-1639. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa808. PubMed 33432345 ↗
  • Saltzman BM, Leroux T, Meyer MA, Basques BA, Chahal J, Bach BR Jr, Yanke AB, Cole BJ. The Therapeutic Effect of Intra-articular Normal Saline Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis of Evidence Level 1 Studies. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep;45(11):2647-2653. doi: 10.1177/0363546516680607. Epub 2016 Dec 27. PubMed 28027657 ↗
  • Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015 May 8;350:h2147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2147. No abstract available. PubMed 25956159 ↗
  • Meenagh GK, Patton J, Kynes C, Wright GD. A randomised controlled trial of intra-articular corticosteroid injection of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Oct;63(10):1260-3. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.015438. PubMed 15361383 ↗
  • Gevers-Montoro C, Freire V, Harris PG, Ruel M, Luong DH, Bureau NJ, Bois MC, Aribert M, Efanov JI, Filali-Mouhim A, Piche M, Hamasaki T. Non-inferiority of saline versus corticosteroid injections for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a protocol for a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2026 May 26;16(5):e111844. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111844. PubMed 42191192 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD will be shared by the investigators upon reasonable request

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Undecided yet

Access criteria: IPD will be shared by the investigators upon reasonable request

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 25 months after the start.

Of 82 phase 2 interventional studies under Osteoarthritis, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 38. This study's planned 25 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 30, 2024
First posted
May 6, 2024
StartActual
Nov 4, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Aug 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06401317
Lead sponsor
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Collaborators
Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal, McGill University, Université de Montréal, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Responsible party
Tokiko Hamasaki (Assistant Professor, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 6, 2024
Start date
Nov 4, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 18, 2026

Study contacts

Tokiko Hamasaki, PhD
Contact
tokiko.hamasaki@uqtr.ca
819-478-5011 ext. 2903
Carlos Gevers-Montoro, PhD
Contact
carlos.geversmontoro@mcgill.ca
819-979-0448
Tokiko Hamasaki, PhD
principal investigator · Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Saline Solution

Start the discussion