ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06394453Updated May 1, 2024

Is Feeding During Therapeutic Hypothermia Safe and Can Improve Outcomes in Infants With Hypoxic-ischaemic Encephalopathy

An interventional study of enteral feeding with mother milk or human donor breast milk in Newborn Asphyxia, sponsored by Nutricia Foundation. Recruiting at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged Up to 6 Hours. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-01.

Sponsored by Nutricia Foundation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 6 Hours
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is the standard of care for newborns with moderate to severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) born at 35 weeks or more of gestation. Many neonatal units do not use enteral feeding during TH, in fear of increased risk of complications. Withholding enteral feedings during TH lacks supporting evidence. The aim of the study is to determine if enteral feeding during TH in patients with HIE is safe and assess its effects. Investigators will perform multicenter randomized controlled study in level III neonatal intensive care units on infants qualified for TH. Infants will be randomized into 2 groups: (1) unfed during 72 hours of TH; (2) fed group, which will start receive enteral feeding with mother milk or human donor breast milk at 10 ml/kg/day during first day of TH, 20 ml/kg/day during second day, 30 ml/kg/day during third day. The primary outcome will be (1) combined necrotizing enterocolitis or death, (2) length of hospital stay. The secondary outcomes will be (1) time to full enteral feeding, (2) late-onset sepsis, (3) Test of Infant Motor Performance scoring, (4) MRI scoring, (5) MR spectroscopy parameters.

Read the detailed description

Investigators will perform a multi-centre, randomized, parallel-arm study in level III neonatal intensive care units in southern part of Poland (Małopolska - 3 units and Podkarpacie - 2 units) on infants qualified for TH. A randomization of subjects will be done via computer software (Redcap Randomization Module). Participants will be allocated to an intervention (TH+human milk (HM)) or control (TH) group. In both groups standard therapeutic hypothermia to rectal temperature of 33,5 C will be performed by 72 hours, including during neonatal transport for outborn babies, starting within 6 hours after birth. Investigators will use mother milk or human donor breast milk, if mother milk is not available.

  1. Inclusion criteria:

    1. 35 weeks or more gestational age
    2. \< 6 hours post birth
    3. Any of the following:

      • Metabolic or mixed acidosis with a pH of ≤7.0 or a base deficit ≥16 mmol/L in an umbilical cord blood sample or any blood obtained within first hour after birth
      • 10-minute Apgar score of ≤5
      • Ongoing resuscitation initiated at birth and continued for ≥10 minutes
    4. Moderate to severe encephalopathy on clinical examination, using a Thompson HIE score ≥ 7
    5. Signed informed consent by parent
  2. Exclusion criteria:

    1. Critical general condition;
    2. Aneuploidies (13 th , 18 th , 21 st );
    3. Birth weight \<1800 g;
    4. Severe congenital defects with poor prognosis;
    5. Severe mechanical head injuries;
    6. Congenital malformations of digestive system (esophageal atresia, duodenal atresia, gastroschisis, omphalocele, anal atresia).

      All eligible newborns will be randomized to one of the two groups :

      1. unfed during 72 hours of TH (control group);
      2. fed group, which will start receiving enteral feeding with mother milk or human donor breast milk at 10 ml/kg/day during first day of TH, 20 ml/kg/day during second day and 30 ml/kg/day during third day (experimental group).

      Both groups will be receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) from day one onwards. Parenteral nutrition will be defined as receiving any type of nutrient solution in any volume through any route of administration (peripheral venous cannula, central venous catheter, or umbilical catheter). As the volume of enteral feeding will be increased, the volume of PN will be decreased gradually.

      During the feeding process participants will be routinely checked up for the signs of feeding intolerance or NEC. Feeding intolerance (FI) will be defined with the presence of one or more of these criteria: (1) gastric residuals >50% on a single occasion among participants who received nosogastric feeds; (2) bilious/bloody gastric residuals among participants who received nosogastric feeds; (3) abdominal distension (increase in abdominal girth by > 2 cm from baseline); (4) emesis; (5) gross or occult blood in the stool.

      Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC, Bell stage 2 or 3) will be diagnosed based on the presence of one or more of the clinical signs (bilious gastric aspirate or emesis, abdominal distension, occult or gross blood in stool) and the presence of at least one of the following sonographic findings: (1) pneumatosis intestinalis, (2) portal vein gas and/or (3) pneumoperitoneum.

      The criteria for stopping the trial intervention: (1) any serious adverse events for enteral feeds, mainly including NEC; (2) infant developed severe/unstable condition (e.g. severe pulmonary hypertension), which lead to stop TH and fasting must last for more than 24 hours.

      Primary endpoints: 1) Combined Necrotizing enterocolitis or death. Necrotizing enterocolitis will be defined by the modified Bell's staging criteria (stage II or stage III).

      2) Length of hospital stay assessed as duration of time spent in hospital before discharge, measured in days.

      Secondary endpoints: 1) Time to full enteral feeding, full enteral feeding defined as participants receive all of their prescribed nutrition as milk feeds and do not receive any supplemental parenteral fluids or nutrition 2) Late-onset sepsis, defined as sepsis occurring at or after 72 hours of life 3) Test of Infant Motor Performance scoring 4) MRI scoring, using MRI scoring system by Rutherford et al., classifying the severity of injury in the basal ganglia and thalami (BGT), cortex (CX), white matter (WM) (each on a scale of 0-3) and posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC) (scale 0-2), the higher number indicating more severe abnormality. Total injury score (TIS) will be the sum of these regional scores (scale of 0-11).

      5) MR spectroscopy parameters, such as Lac/NAA, Lac/Cr, NAA/Cr, CHO/NAA Primary outcomes are reduction of mortality or NEC stage 2 or 3 and length of hospital stay. Investigators assumed that 50% difference as being a clinically significant. Estimated that 43 children in each group are needed to achieve a significant difference with a power of 90%, along with a two-sided 5% significance level. Given the anticipated dropout rate of 20%, 52 subjects are necessary in each group.

      Participants will be randomly assigned to either control or experimental group with a 1:1 allocation based on a computer-generated randomization (Redcap). Caregivers of the participants will remain unblinded. The researchers and the statistician will be blinded until the end of the study.

      The analyses will be performed after last patient out, after monitoring and cleaning of data gathered from all patients. Analyses will be performed by the investigators and statistician, using the latest version of Medcalc statistics software.

      The flow of participants will be illustrated in a flow diagram according the Consolidation Standard of Reporting Trials (CONSORT).

      The main analysis will be performed according the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle.

      The baseline characteristics of the included patients will be reported per randomization group and shown in a baseline table. Dichotomous variables will be summarised as proportion of patients with the count divided by the total number of evaluated patients. Continuous variables will be summarised as mean with standard deviation in case of normal distribution and as median with interquartile range in case of non-normal distribution. Testing for normality of data distributions will be based on the Shapiro-Wilks test. For continuous variables a footnote will state the number of evaluated patients. Differences in baseline characteristics between study arms will be reported as preferred by the intended journal. Differences between the study arms will be analysed using Fisher test, independent t test or Mann-Whitney test if required by the journal.

      The assessment and analysis of the primary and secondary outcomes will be discussed separately. All continuous data will be checked for normality. For continuous outcomes the mean difference (MD) and for dichotomous outcomes the relative risk (RR) will be calculated. The difference between study groups will be considered statistical significant when the p-value is \<0,05, when the 95% CI for RR does not include 1.0 or when 95% CI for MD does not include 0.

02

Conditions studied

  • Newborn Asphyxia

Keywords

  • therapeutic hypothermia, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy
03

In context

Asphyxia Neonatorum

106 studies on the registry are indexed under Asphyxia Neonatorum; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 104 is below the median of 173 across 73 interventional studies indexed under Asphyxia Neonatorum.

Browse Asphyxia Neonatorum studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Nutricia Foundation as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 6 Hours
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. 35 weeks or more gestational age
  2. \< 6 hours post birth
  3. Any of the following:

    • Metabolic or mixed acidosis with a pH of ≤7.0 or a base deficit ≥16 mmol/L in an umbilical cord blood sample or any blood obtained within first hour after birth
    • 10-minute Apgar score of ≤5
    • Ongoing resuscitation initiated at birth and continued for ≥10 minutes
  4. Moderate to severe encephalopathy on clinical examination, using a Thompson HIE score ≥ 7
  5. Signed by parent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Critical general condition
  2. Aneuploidies (13 th , 18 th , 21 st )
  3. Birth weight \<1800 g
  4. Severe congenital defects with poor prognosis
  5. Severe mechanical head injuries
  6. Congenital malformations of digestive system (esophageal atresia, duodenal atresia, gastroschisis, omphalocele, anal atresia)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
104 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    control group

    Control group will be unfed orally during 72 hours of therapeutic hypothermia. The group will be receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) from day one onwards. Parenteral nutrition will be defined as receiving any type of nutrient solution in any volume through any route of administration (peripheral venous cannula, central venous catheter, or umbilical catheter).

  • Experimental
    experimental group

    Experimental group will start receiving enteral feeding at 10 ml/kg/day during first day of TH, 20 ml/kg/day during second day and 30 ml/kg/day during third day. Additionally will be receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) from day one onwards. Parenteral nutrition will be defined as receiving any type of nutrient solution in any volume through any route of administration (peripheral venous cannula, central venous catheter, or umbilical catheter). As the volume of enteral feeding will be increased, the volume of PN will be decreased gradually.

    Other: enteral feeding with mother milk or human donor breast milk

Interventions

  • Otherenteral feeding with mother milk or human donor breast milk

    The experimental group will start enteral feeding with mother milk or human donor breast milk if mother milk is not accesible during the first day of therapeutic hypothermia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Combined Necrotizing enterocolitis or death

    Necrotizing enterocolitis will be defined by the modified Bell's staging criteria (stage II or stage III)

    Time frame: from date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, during hospital stay, an average of 8 weeks

  2. Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: assessed from day of birth until discharge from hospital, an average of 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to full enteral feeding

    full enteral feeding defined as newborn infants receive all of their prescribed nutrition as milk feeds and do not receive any supplemental parenteral fluids or nutrition

    Time frame: assessed from day of birth until discharge from hospital, an average of 8 weeks

  2. Late-onset sepsis

    defined as sepsis occurring at or after 72 hours of life

    Time frame: assessed from day of birth until discharge from hospital, an average of 8 weeks

  3. Test of Infant Motor Performance scoring

    Time frame: assessed from day of birth until discharge from hospital, an average of 8 weeks

  4. MRI scoring

    Using MRI scoring system by Rutherford et al., classifying the severity of injury in the basal ganglia and thalami (BGT), cortex (CX), white matter (WM) (each on a scale of 0-3) and posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC) (scale 0-2), the higher number indicating more severe abnormality. Total injury score (TIS) will be the sum of these regional scores (scale of 0-11)

    Time frame: assessed until the end of the third month of life

  5. MR spectroscopy parameter

    Lac/NAA.

    Time frame: assessed until the end of the third month of life

  6. MR spectroscopy parameter

    Lac/Cr

    Time frame: assessed until the end of the third month of life

  7. MR spectroscopy parameter

    NAA/Cr

    Time frame: assessed until the end of the third month of life

  8. MR spectroscopy parameter

    CHO/NAA

    Time frame: assessed until the end of the third month of life

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University Children's Hospital of Cracow, Neonatal intensive care unit
    Cracow, 30-663, Poland
    Recruiting
    • Viktoryia Parfenchyk, MD · Contactviktoryia.parfenchyk@uj.edu.pl · +48 535275959
    • Witold Błaż, MD · Sub investigator
    • Justyna Ferek, MD · Sub investigator
    • Beata Rzepecka-Węglarz, MD · Sub investigator
    • Małgorzata Stefańska, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 32 months after the start.

Of 33 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Asphyxia Neonatorum, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 34. This study's planned 32 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 33 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 34.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 20, 2024
First posted
May 1, 2024
StartActual
Apr 15, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
May 1, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06394453
Lead sponsor
Nutricia Foundation
Responsible party
Viktoryia Parfenchyk (Principal Investigator, Physician, Nutricia Foundation) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 1, 2024
Start date
Apr 15, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 1, 2024

Study contacts

Viktoryia Parfenchyk, MD
Contact
viktoryia.parfenchyk@uj.edu.pl
+48 535275959
Matuesz Jagla, MD
Contact
mateusz.jagla@uj.edu.pl
Viktoryia Parfenchyk, MD
principal investigator · Collegium Medicum Jagiellonian University in Cracow

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion