CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT06384170CLONUSUpdated Feb 6, 2026

Closed Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuromodulation of Upper Motor Neuron Lesion Spasticity

An observational study in Chronic Pain, Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke and Upper Motor Neuron Lesion, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-06.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
The study will not move forward; lack of staff
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Spasticity is characterized by increased muscle tension and is a classic consequence of upper motor neuron (UMN) damage in the central nervous system, such as from stroke or trauma. Clinically, it presents as muscle resistance to passive stretching, along with clasp-knife rigidity, clonus, increased tendon reflexes, and muscle spasms. An imbalance of the descending inhibitory and muscle stretch reflexes is thought to be the cause of spasticity. Post-stroke spasticity is a common condition that occurs in 37.5-45% of cases in the acute stage and 19-57.4% in the subacute stage after a stroke. At 6 months post-stroke, spasticity develops in 42.6-49.5% of cases, and at one year, it affects 35-57.4% of individuals. In patients with cerebral palsy (CP), incidence is almost 80% while in those living with spinal cord injury the number approaches up to 93%. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients have a higher prevalence on initial admission to neurorehabilitation but one in three patients will have chronic spasticity. However, the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center report a rate of TBIs amongst deployed veterans to be around 11-23% mostly from blast and explosive trauma.

There have been studies as early as the 1980s exploring the efficacy of SCS for spasticity control, however, the credibility of many of these studies is constrained due to an incomplete comprehension of spasticity's underlying mechanisms, outdated research methods, and early limitations in implantable device technology. Intrathecal pumps for baclofen have remained as the mainstay for refractory spasticity, however, it comes with associated risks such as chemical dependence leading to acute baclofen withdrawal and requiring frequent refill requirement. Most importantly, it does not yield functional improvement of muscle activity, just suppression of spasticity. Botox is also routinely used but due to heterogeneity in muscle involvement as well as variability in provider skill, results may be inconsistent and short-lasting, requiring frequent clinic visits for repeat injections to the affected muscle groups. SCS may be able to address that gap in spasticity management.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain
  • Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke
  • Upper Motor Neuron Lesion

Keywords

  • Spinal Cord Stimulation
  • Neuromodulation
  • Closed-loop SCS
  • Post-Stroke Pain
  • Spasticity
  • Chronic Pain
  • Functional Recovery
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 701 are open to participants now.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,783 studies on the registry; 313 are open to participants now.

Of its 203 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

A subject who meets all of the inclusion criteria, and none of the exclusion criteria, is eligible to participate in the study. A subject is considered enrolled when the subject signs the subject informed consent form.

Inclusion criteria

  1. First-ever stroke
  2. Aged 18 and older
  3. Neuropathic pain >3 months (chronic)
  4. Brain injury associated with spasticity in one or multiple limbs >3 months post-stroke
  5. No previous history of neuropathic pain or spasticity in affected limbs
  6. Cognitively capable to operate the SCS system

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inadequate Pain Severity: Patients with mild or non-debilitating pain may be excluded if the treatment is intended for individuals with moderate to severe pain.
  2. Previous SCS Implantation: Patients who have previously undergone SCS implantation may be excluded to focus on those who are new to the therapy.
  3. Inadequate Pain Duration: Some trials may exclude patients whose pain has not persisted for a minimum period to ensure that the pain condition is chronic.
  4. Medical Comorbidities: Patients with certain medical conditions or comorbidities that may increase the risks associated with SCS, such as uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled diabetes, or active infections, may be excluded.
  5. Psychological Factors: Patients with severe psychiatric disorders or psychological conditions that may interfere with the assessment of pain or the ability to provide informed consent may be excluded.
  6. Allergies or Sensitivities: Patients with allergies to materials used in SCS devices or contraindications to the anesthesia used during implantation may be excluded.
  7. Substance Abuse: Patients with active substance abuse or addiction issues may be excluded due to concerns about treatment compliance and efficacy.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Interventional

    Patients identified with post-stroke pain due to spasticity. Patients will be evaluated for spinal cord stimulation trial. The trial will be for 7 days.

    Device: Spinal Cord Stimulation- Closed loop

Interventions

  • DeviceSpinal Cord Stimulation- Closed loop

    This is a percutaneously placed epidural electrode that is connected to a battery-powered impulse generator for power. The electrical delivery is monitored in real-time with the measurement of evoked compound action potentials and adjusted to provide titration of therapeutic stimulation delivery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain as assessed by Visual Analog Score

    Visual Analog Scores, pain score with possible range from zero (no pain) to ten (worst imaginable pain)

    Time frame: baseline (pre-procedure), day 1 (post-procedure) day 7 (trial lead removal), day 14 (7 days post removal)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Spasticity Reduction as assessed by the Modified Ashworth's Score

    Modified Ashworth's Scores range from 0-4. Minimum score is '0' meaning no increase in tone. Maximum score is '4' meaning limb is ridged in flexion and extension. The lower the score the better the outcome

    Time frame: baseline (pre-procedure), day 1 (post-procedure) day 7 (trial lead removal), day 14 (7 days post removal)

  2. Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) score

    The SF-36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. The total score on the SF-36 ranges from 0 - 100 Lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability

    Time frame: baseline (pre-procedure), day 1 (post-procedure) day 7 (trial lead removal), day 14 (7 days post removal)

  3. Medication Use

    Dose and frequency of medication use for current symptoms

    Time frame: baseline (pre-procedure), day 1 (post-procedure) day 7 (trial lead removal), day 14 (7 days post removal)

  4. Health Status as assessed by the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L)

    Effects on health-related quality of life that comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. The survey is scored in two separate sections. The first section is measured by a minimum score of 5 and a maximum score of 25. Higher score greater level of problems. The second section measures self report health status on a 0 to 100. Higher score best health.

    Time frame: baseline (pre-procedure), day 1 (post-procedure) day 7 (trial lead removal), day 14 (7 days post removal)

Other outcomes

  1. Spinal cord neurophysiological wave morphology

    Assessed using data downloaded from the implanted closed-loop SCS system. Will measure and report on the various morphologies of the Evoked Compound Action Potentials (ECAPs).

    Time frame: day 1 (post-procedure), continuous data capture until day 7 (or until trial lead removal), day 14 (7 days post removal)

  2. Spinal cord neurophysiological Current (mA/mV)

    Assessed using data downloaded from the implanted closed-loop SCS system. Will measure and report on the current (mA/mV) of the Evoked Compound Action Potentials (ECAPs).

    Time frame: day 1 (post-procedure), continuous data capture until day 7 (or until trial lead removal), day 14 (7 days post removal)

  3. Spinal Cord Neurophysiological Characteristic- Conduction Velocity (m/s)

    Assessed using data downloaded from the implanted closed-loop SCS system. Will measure and report on the conduction velocity (m/s) of the Evoked Compound Action Potentials (ECAPs).

    Time frame: day 1 (post-procedure), continuous data capture until day 7 (or until trial lead removal), day 14 (7 days post removal)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mayorova L, Radutnaya M, Varyukhina M, Vorobyev A, Zhdanov V, Petrova M, Grechko A. Immediate Effects of Anti-Spastic Epidural Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation on Functional Connectivity of the Central Motor System in Patients with Stroke- and Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Spasticity: A Pilot Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Biomedicines. 2023 Aug 14;11(8):2266. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082266. PubMed 37626762 ↗
  • Powell MP, Verma N, Sorensen E, Carranza E, Boos A, Fields DP, Roy S, Ensel S, Barra B, Balzer J, Goldsmith J, Friedlander RM, Wittenberg GF, Fisher LE, Krakauer JW, Gerszten PC, Pirondini E, Weber DJ, Capogrosso M. Epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord for post-stroke upper-limb paresis. Nat Med. 2023 Mar;29(3):689-699. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02202-6. Epub 2023 Feb 20. PubMed 36807682 ↗
  • Abstracts of Scientific Papers and Posters Presented at Physiatry '25: February 25 - March 1, 2025. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Jun 1;104(6S Suppl 1):S1-S240. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002746. No abstract available. PubMed 40421840 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06384170
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 25, 2024
Start date
Dec 3, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 6, 2026

Study contacts

Akhil Chhatre, MD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion