ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06382623Updated Jun 6, 2024

Efficacies of Different Managements in Patients With Trigger Finger

An observational study in Trigger Finger, sponsored by Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-06.

Sponsored by Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of peritendinous steroid injection under ultrasound guidance and percutaneous A1 pulley release procedures in terms of disease stage, pain, and severity of locking in patients with trigger finger.

Read the detailed description

This study was designed as a randomized, controlled, prospective study. Patients who had been experiencing trigger finger symptoms for at least one month and who presented to the Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, affiliated with the Health Sciences University Faculty of Medicine

Patients were randomly divided into two groups: the peritendinous steroid group (n=15) and the percutaneous pulley release group (n=15). In the first group, under ultrasound guidance, a mixture of 1 ml corticosteroid (2 mg+5 mg/ml betamethasone) and 1 ml local anesthetic (20 ml 2% prilocaine) was injected peritendinously between the A1 pulley and the flexor tendon sheath. In the second group, a percutaneous A1 pulley release procedure was performed under ultrasound guidance using a 20 G needle, followed by peritendinous injection of the same mixture of corticosteroid and local anesthetic.

Patients were evaluated four times: before treatment, at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after treatment. Modified Quinnel classification, VAS (Visual Analog Scale), and severity of locking scales were used as outcome measures in the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trigger Finger
03

In context

Trigger Finger Disorder

93 studies on the registry are indexed under Trigger Finger Disorder; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 68 across 14 observational studies indexed under Trigger Finger Disorder.

Browse Trigger Finger Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 85 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

older 18 ages

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being over 18 years of age
  • Having had trigger finger complaints for more than 1 month
  • Not having received any injections for trigger finger diagnosis within the last 1 month
  • Signing the form indicating willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusing to participate in the study
  • Presence of partial or complete tendon rupture in the relevant tendon of the finger to be treated
  • Presence of wounds and infection in the area where the procedure will be performed
  • Pregnancy status
  • History of allergy to the injected medications (local anesthetic, )
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • The peritendinous steroid group

    A 1 ml mixture of corticosteroid (2 mg + 5 mg/ml betamethasone) and 1 ml of local anesthetic agent (20 ml 2% prilocaine) was injected peritendinously between the A1 pulley and the flexor tendon sheath at the metacarpophalangeal joint level under ultrasound guidance.

    Other: The peritendinous Betamethasone group

  • The percutaneous A1 pulley release group

    In the A1 pulley release group, 1 ml of local anesthetic agent (20 ml 2% prilocaine) was injected into the pulley-associated subcutaneous tissue using a 27 G needle under ultrasound guidance. The metacarpophalangeal joint was brought into slight hyperextension. Subsequently, a 20 G 0.9x38mm needle, modified by bending approximately 40-45 degrees from the proximal 1/3 of the needle with the aid of a cap, was used. The needle was advanced in-plane from distal to proximal along the midline, with simultaneous movement towards the palmar surface, aiming to cut or loosen the pulley between the tendon and A1 pulley. The loosening procedure was repeated from the distal to proximal aspect of the pulley until the sensation of resistance at the needle tip disappeared.

    Procedure: The percutaneous A1 pulley release

Interventions

  • ProcedureThe percutaneous A1 pulley release

    Ultrasound-guided percutaneous pulley release is a procedure aimed at loosening the pulley using various cutting instruments or hypodermic needles under ultrasound guidance.

  • OtherThe peritendinous Betamethasone group

    USG-guided injection of corticosteroid between the A1 pulley and the flexor tendon sheath.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stage of the disease

    Modified Quinnel classification Stage 1: Normal movement, no pain. * Stage 2: Normal movement, occasional pain. * Stage 3: Irregular movement (catching without crepitus or locking). * Stage 4: Locking present, actively correctable. * Stage 5: Locking present, passively correctable.

    Time frame: first week, first mount, third month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    The pain associated with movement in the relevant finger was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Patients were explained that "0" represented no pain at all, "10" represented the most severe pain they had ever experienced in their life, and "5" represented moderate pain. They were asked to indicate a number between 0 and 10 that corresponded to the intensity of pain they were feeling.

    Time frame: first week, first month, third month

  2. severity of triggering

    The severity of catching in patients was assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10. Patients were explained that "0" represents no catching at all, while "10" represents catching requiring passive correction of the finger. They were asked to mark a number between 0 and 10 corresponding to the severity of catching they experienced.

    Time frame: first week, first month, third month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital
    Ankara, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2022 to primary completion in Jun 2023, 8 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 8, 2024
First posted
Apr 24, 2024
StartActual
Oct 1, 2022
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2023
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2023
Last update
Jun 6, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06382623
Lead sponsor
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Yasin Demir (principal investigator, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 24, 2024
Start date
Oct 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2023
Completion
Jun 30, 2023
Last update
Jun 6, 2024

Study contacts

zeliha gizem mac, MD
principal investigator · university of health sciences, Department of PM&R

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion