ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06377774Updated Apr 22, 2024

To Optimize Therapeutic Procedures of DPMAS in ACLF Patients: a Prospective, Sigle Arm and Multicenter Study

An observational study in Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure, sponsored by Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-22.

Sponsored by Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2025, 1 year 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,000
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a life-threaten syndrome carrying high-short-term mortality raging 40% to 60% within 90 days in patients with chronic liver disease. Double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) is one of the available artificial liver support systems, which combines plasma filtration and two specific adsorption membranes dedicating to remove bilirubin and the middle molecular toxins respectively. The efficiency of DMPAS treatment in liver failure patients remains controversial. Previous study indicate that liver failure patients with DPMAS therapy improve the short-term mortality and prevent the diseases progression within 28 days (PADSTONE Study). Thus, this single-arm, multicenter and prospective study is to further validate and optimize the therapeutic procedures of DPMAS therapy in ACLF patients.

Read the detailed description

Liver failure in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and carries high short-term mortality ranging 40% to 60% within 90 days. In China Mainland, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the most common etiology of liver failure in CLD patients which reveals histological signature with submissive hepatic necrosis. While liver transplantation (LT) remains the treatment of choice, the lack of organ transplants necessitates finding alternative solutions. Supportive therapy including cardiovascular or renal support, treatment of encephalopathy and extracorporeal liver support, are the available treatments for liver failure patients in the clinical practice.

Artificial liver support system (ALSS) can remove inflammatory cytokines and toxins which is commonly used in clinical practice to treat liver failure. Double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) which is one of the ALSS combines plasma filtration and two specific adsorption membranes which can effectively remove bilirubin and the middle molecular toxins respectively. Within the last years, DPMAS is developed to one of the most recent non-biological extracorporeal liver support devices that used in acute or acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients. In the clinical practice, DPMAS therapy in liver failure patients usually combines with therapeutic plasma exchange (PE). Previous investigations suggested that DPMAS and therapeutic PE were similar in improving 90-day survivals and DPMAS together with PE ameliorated the inflammatory response and improved the 28-day survival in HBV related ACLF.

However, the efficiency of DMPAS treatment in liver failure patients remains controversial and no large scale study to explore the potential subgroup of liver failure patients with chronic liver disease that may benefit from DPMAS therapy at present. Our previous study (PADSTONE Study) indicate that DPMAS therapy may improve the short-term mortality and prevent the disease progression in ACLF patients which needs to be further validated.

Accordingly, this single-arm study will enroll the ACLF patients with DPMAS therapy and aim to optimize and validate the therapeutic procedures of the DPMAS therapy in ACLF patients. Biological-samples will be collected in this study including plasma, urine and stools and multi-omics will be performed to explore and validate the precise profiles/biomarkers of the indication of DPMAS treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure

Keywords

  • double plasma molecular adsorption system
  • acute-on-chronic liver failure
  • short-term mortality
03

In context

Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure

167 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure; 62 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,000 is above the median of 235 across 65 observational studies indexed under Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure.

Browse Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University is the lead sponsor of 490 studies on the registry; 214 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study focus on acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients which carries high prevalence and short-term mortality. ACLF patients are featured by multiple organ failure. Except for liver transplantation, the routine use of artificial or bioartifical extracorporeal liver support or plasma exchange appears to be a promising and effective bridging therapy in patients with ACLF to liver transplantation or spontaneous regeneration.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Sign the voluntarily;
  2. Age>18 years old;
  3. Inpatients;
  4. Chronic liver disease;
  5. The value of total ≥12mg/dl and ≥1.5;
  6. Patients are planned to have DPMAS therapy according to the physicians' judgment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The pregnant;
  2. With severe chronic heart disease (>II);
  3. With severe (GOLD>III);
  4. With serious mental illness that prevents patients from sell-reporting;
  5. Patients with unstable hemodynamics caused by infection or acute bleeding;
  6. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma during screening period (BCLC>B);
  7. With severe extrahepatic malignant carcinoma;
  8. Patients who had liver resection or other organ transplantation;
  9. Patients who had participated in, or are planning to participate in other clinical trial within the 3 months prior to enrollment;
  10. Hospital stays \<48 hours;
  11. Not suitable to participate in this study judging by researchers;
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • DPMAS therapy group

    This is a prosepctive, sigle-arm and muticenter study. The study will enroll ACLF patients which receive the DPMAS therpay during hospitalization.

    Other: No intervention in this study

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention in this study

    No intervention in this study

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 28-day transplantation-free mortality

    Comparing to the PADSTONE study, the 28-day transplantation-free mortality in ACLF patients with DPMAS therapy.

    Time frame: 28 days

  2. The disease progression rate

    Comparing to the PADSTONE study, the disease progression (progress to EASL defined ACLF) rate within 28 days.

    Time frame: 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. the 90-day transplantation-free mortality

    Comparing to the PADSTONE study, the 90-day transplantation-free mortality in ACLF patients with DPMAS therapy.

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. the disease progression

    Comparing to the PADSTONE study, the disease progression (progress to EASL defined ACLF) rate within 90 days

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for May 2024; primary completion for Mar 2025, 10 months later.

Of 38 observational studies under Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 65. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 14, 2024
First posted
Apr 22, 2024
StartEst.
May 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Mar 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Feb 1, 2026
Last update
Apr 22, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06377774
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 22, 2024
Start date
May 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 22, 2024

Study contacts

Beiling Li, Dr
Contact
820584791@qq.com
+8613570541527
Jinjun Chen, Dr.
principal investigator · Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion