ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT06372977Updated Apr 18, 2024

Kappa Index Versus Csf Oligoclonal Bands in Diagnosis of ms and Prediction of Disease Activity

An observational study in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-18.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2024), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
140
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To:

  1. Compare the diagnostic performance of cerebrospinal fluid kappa index to that of cerebrospinal fluid IgG oligoclonal bands in differentiating multiple sclerosis from other inflammatory and non-inflammatory neurological diseases .
  2. Assess the role of kappa free light chain and oligoclonal bands in predicting disease activity (conversion from clinical isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis)
Read the detailed description

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory immune-mediated disorder of the central nervous system.Diagnosis requires the combination of clinical signs and symptoms with paraclinical findings obtained by magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid analysis .which are componants of the 2017 McDonald criteria .So far, the gold standard for demonstrating intrathecal IgG synthesis is represented by selective oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid by isoelectric focusing (IEF), alongside an elevated IgG index .However, the detection of oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid has several limits as , it requires a time-consuming and expensive laboratory technique, with about three hours needed to obtain results Furthermore, it only provides aqualitative information about the presence of IgG in CSF .During CNS inflammation , kappa free light chain are secreted in the CSF and their concentration reflect the degree of intrathecal B cells and plasma cells activation .Measurement of KFLC could help diagnosis of OCB negative MS and identify intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis in patient presenting with one isolated band on isoelectric focusing , and it is fully automated,rater independent, stable against preanalytical errors . Thus, the intrathecal synthesis of free light chains are more sensitive, less costly, and less time-consuming compared To OCB detection .The most reliable parameter used to assess FLC diagnostic value in MS is the k-index, .So κ-FLC index predicted the time to conversion to MS as well as disability progression . So patients with early MS and high κ-FLC index is an independent risk factor for conversion from CIS to MS

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,524 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 668 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 100 across 1,034 observational studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,050 studies on the registry; 2,174 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

we will select for this study 140 patients including control group and patients group aged between 18 -40

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with CIS or MS according to the 2017 revision of the McDonald criteria
  • Patients diagnosed with RIS (Radiological isolated syndrome) according to the criteria by Okuda
  • Age between 18 and 40 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of exposure, in the 30 days prior to CSF collection, to immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory therapies .
  • Peripheral neurological disorders .
  • Infectious CNS disease.
  • CNS tumor.
  • Monoclonal gammopathy .
  • Chronic kidney injury (GFR \<30 ml /min/1.75m2 )
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • 1

    (-ve OCB )(70 patients) Control group which include patients with inflammatory and non-inflammatory neurological diseases (such as cerebral small vessel disease or unspecific white matter lesion )

    Diagnostic Test: kappa index

  • 2

    (+ve OCBs )(70 patients) Patients presenting for the diagnostic workup, including CSF analysis , of clinical and/or MRI suspicion of MS or CIS.

    Diagnostic Test: kappa index

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testkappa index

    CSF albumin /serum albumin ratio (Qalb) k-index = (CSF kFLC/serum kFLC)/Qalb

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assess the diagnostic performance of CSF k index in differentiating MS from other inflammatory and non-inflammatory neurological diseases .

    measure specificity and sensitivity of kappa free light chain

    Time frame: baseline

  2. Assess the diagnostic performance of CSF IgG OCBs in differentiating MS from other inflammatory and non-inflammatory neurological diseases .

    measure specificity and sensitivity of cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal bands

    Time frame: baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assess the role of k FLC in predicting disease activity (conversion from CIS to MS)

    measure positive predictive value and negative predictive value of kappa free light chain

    Time frame: baseline

  2. Assess the role of OCBs in predicting disease activity (conversion from CIS to MS)

    measure positive predictive value and negative predictive value of oligoclonal bands

    Time frame: baseline

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gaetani L, Di Carlo M, Brachelente G, Valletta F, Eusebi P, Mancini A, Gentili L, Borrelli A, Calabresi P, Sarchielli P, Ferri C, Villa A, Di Filippo M. Cerebrospinal fluid free light chains compared to oligoclonal bands as biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2020 Feb 15;339:577108. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2019.577108. Epub 2019 Nov 7. PubMed 31743879 ↗
  • Duell F, Evertsson B, Al Nimer F, Sandin A, Olsson D, Olsson T, Khademi M, Hietala MA, Piehl F, Hansson M. Diagnostic accuracy of intrathecal kappa free light chains compared with OCBs in MS. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020 Jun 11;7(4):e775. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000775. Print 2020 Jul. PubMed 32527760 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06372977
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Reham mohamed ahmed abdelsater (doctor, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 18, 2024
Start date
May 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 18, 2024

Study contacts

reham abdelsater, assistant lecturer
Contact
rehamabdelsater@gmail.com
01024478076
Madeha Younis bakheet, professor
Contact
m.younis@aun.edu.eg
01009344150

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion