ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06365307Updated Jul 23, 2024

Comparative Study of Gene-Activated Bone Substitute "Histograft" for Lumbar and Cervical Spinal Fusion

An interventional study of Osteoplastic material based on octacalcium phosphate and biologically active nucleic acids for bone tissue regeneration Nucleostim-VEGF ("Histograft") and Synthetic osteoplastic material based on β-TCP or bone autograft in Cervical Disc Disorder With Radiculopathy, Spinal Stenosis and Lumbar and Other Intervertebral Disc Disorders With Radiculopathy, sponsored by Histograft Co., Ltd.. Recruiting at 1 site in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-23.

Sponsored by Histograft Co., Ltd. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2024, 2 years 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2023, registered Apr 2024).
  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination product "Histograft", a bone substitute based on octacalcium phosphate (OCP) and plasmid DNA encoding VEGFA gene, in spinal fusion prosedure in comparison with bone autografts and synthetic material based on β-TCP

Read the detailed description

An open-label non-randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted with two groups of patients. Following enrollment based on specific indication criteria, all patients will undergo surgical treatment (spinal fusion) using either bone substitute "Histograft" (for spinal fusion of cervical and lumbar spine) or bone autograft (for spinal fusion of lumbar spine), or synthetic material based on β-TCP (for spinal fusion of cervical spine). The primary outcomes will involve the bone fusion rate evaluated with computer tomography (CT) at 6 and 12 months. For the safety assessment, the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs) will be monitored throughout the entire clinical trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Disc Disorder With Radiculopathy
  • Spinal Stenosis
  • Lumbar and Other Intervertebral Disc Disorders With Radiculopathy
  • Biomechanical Lesion, Unspecified

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Spinal fusion
  • Bone graft
03

In context

Spinal Stenosis

458 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Stenosis; 105 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 80 across 281 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Stenosis.

Browse Spinal Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Histograft Co., Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • signing the
  • indications for spinal fusion: degenerative-dystrophic diseases of the cervical and lumbar spine.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal to sign IP
  • age less than 18 years
  • history of spinal surgery in the area of planned spinal fusion
  • decompensated forms of chronic diseases
  • oncological diseases with identified or risk of metastasis
  • patient's refusal to participate in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Clinical group

    Group of patients, who is treated with usage of Histograft bone substitute (gene-activated matrix based on octacalcium phosphate and plasmid DNA encoding VEGFA gene) in spinal fusion of cervical or lumbal spine

    Combination Product: Osteoplastic material based on octacalcium phosphate and biologically active nucleic acids for bone tissue regeneration Nucleostim-VEGF ("Histograft")

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Group of patients, who get standard treatment with usage of synthetic osteoplastic material based on β-TCP for spinal fusion of the cervical spine or use of bone autograft for spinal fusion of the lumbar spine

    Other: Synthetic osteoplastic material based on β-TCP or bone autograft

Interventions

  • Combination productOsteoplastic material based on octacalcium phosphate and biologically active nucleic acids for bone tissue regeneration Nucleostim-VEGF ("Histograft")

    Due to the localization of the pathological process, all patients are divided into two groups: 1 - cervical spine, 2 - lumbar spine. Within these groups, patients are treated with either gene-activated osteoplastic material Histograft or synthetic osteoplastic material based on β-TCP (β-tricalcium phosphate) for spinal fusion of the cervical spine, or with bone autograft for spinal fusion of the lumbar spine.

  • OtherSynthetic osteoplastic material based on β-TCP or bone autograft

    Due to the localization of the pathological process, all patients are divided into two groups: 1 - cervical spine, 2 - lumbar spine. Within these groups, patients are treated with either gene-activated osteoplastic material Histograft or synthetic osteoplastic material based on β-TCP (β-tricalcium phosphate) for spinal fusion of the cervical spine, or with bone autograft for spinal fusion of the lumbar spine.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Spinal fusion

    Vertebral fusion: formation of a "bone block" according to CT data (regenerated bone density between the vertebrae without areas of fibrosis and signs of resorption around metal structures)

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months after intervention

  2. Adverse events and Severe Adverse Events

    Frequency of Adverse and Severe Adverse Events after treatment

    Time frame: Within 1 year after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. SF- 36 score (The Short Form-36)

    Assessment of life quality. A score value is ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health status

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months after treatment

  2. Unexpected Adverse Drug Reaction

    Identification of Unexpected Adverse Drug Reaction

    Time frame: Within 1 year after intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Scientific Clinical Center No. 2 of Federal State Budgetary Research Institution "Russian research center of surgery named after academician B.V.Petrovsky"
    Moscow, Moscow Oblast 117588, Russian Federation
    Recruiting
    • Renat Nurmukhametov · Contactethic@med.ru
    • Mark Aleksanyan · Contact
    • Renat Nurmukhametov, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2024, 9 months after the start.

Of 123 interventional studies with no phase under Spinal Stenosis, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 8, 2024
First posted
Apr 15, 2024
StartActual
Nov 13, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2024
CompletionEst.
Apr 2025
Last update
Jul 23, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06365307
Lead sponsor
Histograft Co., Ltd.
Collaborators
Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 15, 2024
Start date
Nov 13, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 23, 2024

Study contacts

Renat Nurmukhametov
Contact
ethic@med.ru
+7(965)437-8946

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion