ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06364306PRIORUpdated Jul 24, 2026

oPen Versus RobotIc retrOmuscular Repair in Medium to Large Ventral Hernias

An interventional study of Robotically-assisted ventral hernia repair (RVHR) and Open ventral hernia repair (OVHR) in Ventral Hernia, Incisional Hernia and Abdominal Wall Defect, sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Recruiting at 3 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-24.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study investigates on the effect of two different operative techniques to treat large abdominal wall defects.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the minimally-invasive, robotically-assisted ventral hernia repair (RVHR) leads to a better outcome than the open ventral hernia repair (OVHR).

The main questions it aims to answer are:

length of stay after the operation rate of complications rate of recurrence and reoperations quality of life.

Participants will:

Either be operated using the RVHR or OVHR will be followed up either in person or via email / phone call at day 7, day 30, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years after the surgery to asses the above-stated main and some more outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ventral Hernia
  • Incisional Hernia
  • Abdominal Wall Defect
03

In context

Hernia, Ventral

230 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Ventral; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 90 across 153 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Ventral.

Browse Hernia, Ventral studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland is the lead sponsor of 990 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient age >18 years
  • obtained
  • Transverse diameter of ventral hernia >4cm - 15cm
  • Eligible to open and minimally-invasive surgery according to preoperative anaesthetic assessment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • precedent hernia treatment with mesh placement in the retromuscular space
  • precedent anterior or posterior component separation or transversus abdominis release (TAR)
  • active wound infection
  • current cancer diagnosis
  • presence of ileostomy, colostomy or ileal conduit
  • liver disease defined by the presence of ascites
  • end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis
  • need of an emergency surgery
  • pregnancy

Criteria for participating surgeons Each participating surgeon has performed 20 or more OVHR and RVHR.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Robotically-assisted ventral hernia repair (RVHR)

    Procedure: Robotically-assisted ventral hernia repair (RVHR)

  • Active comparator
    Open ventral hernia repair (OVHR)

    Procedure: Open ventral hernia repair (OVHR)

Interventions

  • ProcedureRobotically-assisted ventral hernia repair (RVHR)

    3 8mm robotic trocars are placed intraabdominally and the DaVinci Xi-robotic system is docked. Adhesiolysis from any adherent structures to the abdominal wall is performed. Incision of the lateral verge of the retromuscular space and retromuscular dissection. Superior and inferior cross-over to the contralateral retromuscular space and dissection of the hernia sac. Unilateral or bilateral transversus abdominis release (TAR) is performed, if necessary. Running suture with absorbable barbed suture of the posterior rectus sheath and peritoneum, as appropriate. Synthetic retromuscular mesh placement with a mesh-size as large as the prepared surface allows. Closure of the anterior rectus sheath with absorbable barbed running suture. Port extraction, skin closure. Dressing from xyphoid to pubis and 6 lateral dressings for blinding purposes.

  • ProcedureOpen ventral hernia repair (OVHR)

    Median laparotomy with a minimal length of the previous scar (in case of incisional hernia) and adhesiolysis is performed, where necessary, to liberate the abdominal wall and the ventral hernia from adhesions. Bilateral dissection of the posterior rectus sheath under visualisation and sparing of the epigastric vessels and neurovascular bundles. Closure of the posterior rectus sheath with a slowly-absorbable running suture. Indication for a uni- or bilateral TAR identical to the intervention group. Retromuscular synthetic mesh placement with a mesh-size as far as the prepared surface allows. Mesh fixation optional with either absorbable sutures to the posterior sheath or with glubran glue. Closure of the anterior rectus sheath with a slowly-absorbable running suture. Skin closure. Dressing from xyphoid to pubis and 6 lateral dressings for blinding purposes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary outcome: length of stay

    Length of stay Length of stay is defined as the time from the operation until patient discharge is feasible according to the following criteria: * pain on numeric rating scale (NRS) \< 4 without opioid use * tolerance of oral food intake without nausea / vomiting * no signs of surgical site occurrence (SSO) or other postoperative complications * no drains in place * autonomy in daily living activities

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comprehensive complication index (CCI)

    According to Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Clavien P. The Comprehensive Complication Index. Ann Surg. 2013;258 The CCI ranges from 0 (no complications) to maximum 100 (death of the patient).

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Adverse events

    * Intraoperative adverse events (bleeding, conversion rate, injury to bowel structures) * Postoperative adverse events (all other than surgical site occurrences such as ileus, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, etc.) according to Clavien-Dindo Classification up to 30 days after surgery.

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. pain after surgery

    \- Pain, measured using the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Short Form 3a after 7days, 30 days, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years. The range fro the PROMIS ranges from 3 (no pain) to maximum of 15 (very severe pain) points.

    Time frame: 5 years

  4. Functional recovery

    Functional recovery measured using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire. The questionnaire uses 5 questions describing the patients health and abilities on that particular day and a visual analogue scale question (0 = worst, 100 = best) on the patients health on that particular day.

    Time frame: 5 years

  5. Quality of life using SF-12 form

    The 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) is a general health questionnaire that was first published in 1995 as part of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS). The SF-12 was constructed using questions drawn from each of the 8 dimensions of the MOS 36 item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Two summary scores are reported from the SF-12 - a mental component score (MCS-12) and a physical component score (PCS-12). The score ranges from 0 - 100, with a higher score indicating better physical and mental health functioning.

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Individual patient data (IPD) may be shared upon reasonable request. If IPD is shared, data will be anonymised completely.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 29 months after the start.

Of 75 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hernia, Ventral, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 29 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 88 studies reached it within 37 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 28, 2024
First posted
Apr 15, 2024
StartActual
Jul 14, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2033
Last update
Jul 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06364306
Collaborators
St. Clara Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, Klinikum Kempten, Kempten, Germany, Hôpital du Valais
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 15, 2024
Start date
Jul 14, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2033 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2026

Study contacts

Fiorenzo Angehrn, MD
Contact
fiorenzo.angehrn@clarunis.ch
00 41 61 777 73 17
Johannes Baur, MD
principal investigator · Clarunis - Universitäres Bauchzentrum Basel
Julian Süsstrunk, MD
principal investigator · Clarunis - Universitäres Bauchzentrum Basel

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion