ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06360939RadioAblate-VTUpdated Feb 18, 2026

Radiotherapy vs Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Structural Heart Disease

An interventional study of SBRT and CA in Ventricular Tachycardia, Cardiomyopathies and Arrhythmias, Cardiac, sponsored by Western Sydney Local Health District. Recruiting at 1 site in Australia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-18.

Sponsored by Western Sydney Local Health District · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to test the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with advanced structural heart disease. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What is the efficacy of SBRT compared to catheter ablation (CA) in achieving a ≥ 75% reduction in VT burden at 6 months
  • What is the comparable safety profile of SBRT vs CA Researchers will compare SBRT and CA (standard of care).
Read the detailed description

Hypothesis

We hypothesise that in an open label randomised controlled trial of patients with advanced structural heart disease and ventricular tachycardia (VT) that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) will be superior in reducing VT burden compared to standard care comprising of catheter ablation (CA) and routine medical care with acceptable safety and adverse events.

Aims

This is a trial to examine if in an open label randomised trial of 60 patients with structural heart disease and VT followed for 3 years with a minimum follow up of 1 year of SBRT compared CA results in:

  1. An improvement in a primary outcome of proportion of patients with a ≥75% reduction in VT burden in the 6 months following intervention compared to the 6 months intervention
  2. Comparable safety profile (serious adverse events [SAE] and adverse events of special interest [AESI] at 6 months;
  3. reduction in secondary endpoints at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of: any VT recurrence, absolute % reduction in VT burden compared to 6 months pre-treatment, number of anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) compared to pre-treatment, cardiovascular hospitalisation, all-cause mortality, cardiac transplantation, combined endpoint of cardiovascular hospitalisation/transplant/mortality, SAE and AESI from treatment, ventricular function abd change of quality of life (QOL) metrics (at 12 months).
02

Conditions studied

  • Ventricular Tachycardia
  • Cardiomyopathies
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac
  • Ventricular Arrythmia

Keywords

  • catheter ablation
  • stereotactic body radiation therapy
  • non invasive
  • radioablation
03

In context

Tachycardia, Ventricular

451 studies on the registry are indexed under Tachycardia, Ventricular; 120 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 71 across 280 interventional studies indexed under Tachycardia, Ventricular.

Browse Tachycardia, Ventricular studies →

Lead sponsor

Western Sydney Local Health District is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Structural heart disease (including ischaemic cardiomyopathy , non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy or congenital heart disease and defined as any one of

    1. segmental or global decreased ventricular wall motion as defined by TTE, CT or cMRI
    2. myocardial hypertrophy
    3. myocardial scar (evidenced by late gadolinium enhancement on cMRI, wall thinning on cardiac CT, low voltage on electrophysiological study or abnormal intracardiac echocardiography)
  2. Recurrent monomorphic VT which can include

    1. at least one episode of VT treated by ICD and/or
    2. sustained VT (lasting >30s) and/or
    3. inducible sustained VT on invasive electrophysiological study (EPS) or non-invasive programmed stimulation (NIPS)
  3. PAINESD score of ≥9 points and/or at least moderate risk of VT recurrence or death as defined by the I-VT score. Both are validated tools used clinically to identify patient at high risk of VT recurrence and/or mortality after CA.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age \< 18 years
  2. \< 3 months
  3. Catheter ablation deemed futile or with prohibitive risk by cardiac electrophysiologist.
  4. Unwilling or unable to provide consent
  5. Known cardiac channelopathies (e.g. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), long- or short syndrome, Brugada syndrome)
  6. to radiotherapy as deemed by referring physician and/or radiation oncologist
  7. Pregnancy or breast feeding
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stereotactic body radiation therapy

    SBRT within 6 weeks of randomisation guided by previous electrophysiology studies, electrocardiograms and cardiac imaging.

    Radiation: SBRT

  • Active comparator
    Catheter ablation

    CA within 6 weeks of randomisation (constituting standard of care for patients with VT and structural heart disease)

    Procedure: CA

Interventions

  • RadiationSBRT

    Delivery of 25Gy in a single dose fraction to target area within 6 weeks of randomization

  • ProcedureCA

    CA (endocardial and/or epicardial at operator discretion) within 6 weeks of randomization.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. VT burden

    Change in proportion of patients with a ≥75% reduction in VT burden at 6 months (number of VT episodes in 6 months post treatment compared to the number of VT episodes in the 6 months prior to randomisation excluding a 6-week blanking period after treatment initiation)

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recurrent sustained VT

    Recurrent sustained VT ascertained by implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (VT identified and treated by the ICD with anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and/or internal ICD delivered shock or ≥30 seconds of VT if untreated by ICD

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

  2. VT storm

    VT storm (three or more documented episodes of VT within 24 hours or incessant VT)

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

  3. Absolute VT burden

    Absolute percentage reduction in VT burden compared to pre-ablation

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

  4. Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

    1. SAE and AESI related to effects of SBRT 2. SAE and AESI related to standard care e.g. medical anti-arrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation or heart transplantation

    Time frame: At all time points up to 36 months

  5. ICD shocks

    Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator shocks

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

  6. Hospitalization

    Cardiovascular as well as specifically heart failure and arrhythmia

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

  7. All cause mortality

    All cause mortality

    Time frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months

  8. Cardiovascular Mortality

    Cardiovascular mortality

    Time frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months

  9. Composite outcome of VT recurrence/hospitalisation/death/ cardiac transplantation

    Composite outcome as above

    Time frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months

  10. Ventricular function

    As determined by echocardiography (ejection fraction, speckle tracking echocardiography)

    Time frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months

  11. Quality of Life as per Short Form - 36 (SF-36) Score

    Change in quality of life at 6 and 12 months (compared to pre-intervention) as measured by Short Form- 36 (SF-36) \[0-100 scale, 0 is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability\].

    Time frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months

  12. Quality of Life as per Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Concerns Questionnaire (ICDC) score

    Change in quality of life at 6 and 12 months (compared to pre-intervention) as measured by Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Concerns Questionnaire (ICDC) score. \[0-100 scale, 100 equivalent to maximum concern\]

    Time frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months

  13. Number of AADs

    Number of AADs at time points following randomization

    Time frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 7 months after the start.

Of 85 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Tachycardia, Ventricular, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 25 and three quarters within 70. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 125 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 2, 2024
First posted
Apr 11, 2024
StartActual
Nov 3, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 20, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 20, 2027
Last update
Feb 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06360939
Lead sponsor
Western Sydney Local Health District
Collaborators
University of Sydney, National Heart Foundation, Australia
Responsible party
Saurabh Kumar (Associate Professor, Western Sydney Local Health District) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 11, 2024
Start date
Nov 3, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 20, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 18, 2026

Study contacts

Saurabh Kumar, MBBS | PhD
Contact
saurabh.kumar@health.nsw.gov.au
(02)88908140 ext. +61

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion