CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06339801Updated Jan 3, 2025

Role of Mucosal Impedance Measurement for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

An observational study in Gastroesophageal Reflux, sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín. Recruiting at 1 site in Argentina. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-03.

Sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Dec 2024; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Existing current tests for diagnosing GERD are suboptimal because they lack adequate sensitivity or specificity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is highly specific for diagnosing GERD, particularly when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D). Nevertheless, its sensitivity is limited, as this scenario is only present in 30% of cases. Most patients will exhibit normal endoscopic findings, indicating Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD). The 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring (MII) is currently considered the gold standard. However, its main limitation is that it can only measure reflux activity over a 24-hour period, in addition to the discomfort caused by the catheter. 6-8 It is noteworthy that 50% of patients with NERD will have pathological reflux, and the other 50% will have a sensory disorder. The importance of making an accurate diagnosis lies in the treatment, which varies in each case.11 Recently, a minimally invasive device was developed and validated in the USA to assess changes in esophageal mucosal impedance. This serves as a tool for evaluating tissue changes associated with chronic reflux. However, this device has recently undergone improvements. This new technology has not been tested yet for GERD diagnosis. The primary benefit would be the ability to diagnose GERD in symptomatic patients with NERD during the initial endoscopy conducted under sedation.

Objectives

The Main objectives of this study are to:

  1. Evaluate the diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement.
  2. Investigate the mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.

Secondary objectives:

  1. Evaluate the correlation between the global mucosal impedance measurement vs the first 3cm measurement
  2. Evaluate the best probability score to distinguish between GERD and non-GERD Design Prospective, cross-sectional, and analytical study Study Design and Procedures The study will be conducted in the Gastroenterology Department of the Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martin, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Following a 4-week screening period during which a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) washout will be performed, and baseline measurements will be taken, all patients will undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with mucosal impedance measurement and 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring.
Read the detailed description

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) occurs when gastroduodenal content refluxes, causing bothersome symptoms and/or complications. 1 It is estimated that GERD affects 20-30% of the population in Western countries 2 (23% in Argentina), and it is associated with an impairment in the quality of life and significant healthcare costs. 3-5 Existing current tests for diagnosing GERD are suboptimal because they lack adequate sensitivity or specificity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is highly specific for diagnosing GERD, particularly when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D). Nevertheless, its sensitivity is limited, as this scenario is only present in 30% of cases. Most patients will exhibit normal endoscopic findings, indicating Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD). The 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring (MII) is currently considered the gold standard. However, its main limitation is that it can only measure reflux activity over a 24-hour period, in addition to the discomfort caused by the catheter. 6-8 The last Lyon Consensus considered GERD when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D) or acid exposure time (AET) is \>6% on ambulatory studies. Acid exposure time \<4% definitively rules out pathologic gastroesophageal acid reflux, while AET between 4-6% is considered borderline. 9,10 It is noteworthy that 50% of patients with NERD will have pathological reflux, and the other 50% will have a sensory disorder. The importance of making an accurate diagnosis lies in the treatment, which varies in each case.11 Recently, a minimally invasive device was developed and validated in the USA to assess changes in esophageal mucosal impedance. This serves as a tool for evaluating tissue changes associated with chronic reflux.12 However, this device has recently undergone improvements. This new technology has not been tested yet for GERD diagnosis. The primary benefit would be the ability to diagnose GERD in symptomatic patients with NERD during the initial endoscopy conducted under sedation.

Objectives

The Main objectives of this study are to:

  1. Evaluate the diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement.
  2. Investigate the mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.

Secondary objectives:

  1. Evaluate the correlation between the global mucosal impedance measurement vs the first 3cm measurement
  2. Evaluate the best probability score to distinguish between GERD and non-GERD Design Prospective, cross-sectional, and analytical study METHODS Participants, Interventions, and Outcomes. Study Setting Inclusion Criteria Patients \>18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis.

Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Esophageal disorders (esophageal motor disorders, eosinophilic esophagitis, neoplastic diseases)
  • Uncontrolled systemic diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, cancer, etc.)
  • Lack of informed consent
  • Severe psychiatric disorders Study Design and Procedures The study will be conducted in the Gastroenterology Department of the Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martin, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Following a 4-week screening period during which a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) washout will be performed, and baseline measurements will be taken, all patients will undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with mucosal impedance measurement and 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring.

Intervention All patients will undergo mucosal impedance (MI) measurement using the MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.). The MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System utilizes a device (MiVu™ Endo Cap) that attaches to the distal end of the endoscope, along with proprietary software to instantly detect changes in esophageal mucosal integrity during endoscopy. Patients are required to fast for 8 hours before the procedure. During an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy under anesthesia sedation, measurements are taken from direct contact of the sensors with the esophageal mucosa. Any luminal air or liquid between the sensors and mucosal tissue will be pressed away from the tissue being measured. After identifying the gastroesophageal junction, measurements will be initiated 2cm above it. The endoscopist will wait until all 3 sensors make stable contact with the mucosa, indicated by high-quality signals marked in green color by the software. The Study Metrics require data spanning 10 consecutive centimeters. Each measurement capture will span 3 cm, and a minimum of 4 measurements spanning 10 cm are required. Once measurements have been captured at 4 depths, the metrics will populate. MI measurements will be expressed in Ohms and analyzed using the ZVU software version 3.3 or greater (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.). Once 10 centimeters worth of consecutive data have been acquired, the probabilities of disease will be displayed and patients will be categorized as: 1) NERD and 2) Non-NERD based on the measurement result. The results will be expressed in Ohms, and the interpretation will be based on the results from table 2 in the previous MI validation publication.14 Subsequently, a 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring without proton pump inhibitors (PPI), preceded by high-resolution esophageal manometry to identify the lower esophageal sphincter height, will be performed. Both assessments will be conducted by different operators in a blind and independent manner.

Patients will be divided into two groups: A) NERD: when the percentage of time of acid exposure is greater than 6%, B) Non-NERD: when the percentage of acid exposure is less than 4%. The Demeester score will be reported for both groups.

Treatment response evaluation

Based on the previously described categorization, the following treatment will be initiated:

  1. Dexlansoprazole 30mg per day in the GERD group
  2. Amitriptyline 10mg per day in the non-GERD group At 8 weeks post-treatment, a GerdQ assessment will be conducted. Sample Size Considering an estimated sensitivity of mucosal impedance measurement for the diagnosis of GERD of 70%, a sample size of 100 patients was calculated. Factoring in a 20% patient loss, a total of 120 patients will be screened.
02

Conditions studied

  • Gastroesophageal Reflux

Keywords

  • gastroesophageal reflux
  • mucosal impedance
03

In context

Gastroesophageal Reflux

1,066 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 188 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 180 across 298 observational studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients >18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis.

Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients >18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis.

Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ● Pregnancy or lactation

    • Esophageal disorders (esophageal motor disorders, eosinophilic esophagitis, neoplastic diseases)
    • Uncontrolled systemic diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, cancer, etc.)
    • Lack of informed consent
    • Severe psychiatric disorders
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • GERD group

    Patients \>18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis. Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included

    Device: MiVu

Interventions

  • DeviceMiVu

    All patients will undergo mucosal impedance (MI) measurement using the MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. diagnostic performance

    diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement

    Time frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure

  2. mucosal impedance pattern

    mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.

    Time frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlations

    correlation between the global mucosal impedance measurement vs the first 3cm measurement

    Time frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure

  2. Probability score

    the best probability score to distinguish between GERD and non-GERD

    Time frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hospital de Clinicas
    Buenos Aires, 1119, Argentina
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Martinez SD, Malagon IB, Garewal HS, Cui H, Fass R. Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)--acid reflux and symptom patterns. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Feb 15;17(4):537-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01423.x. PubMed 12622762 ↗
  • Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, Katzka D, Pandolfino J, Savarino E, Sifrim D, Spechler S, Zerbib F, Fox MR, Bhatia S, de Bortoli N, Cho YK, Cisternas D, Chen CL, Cock C, Hani A, Remes Troche JM, Xiao Y, Vaezi MF, Roman S. Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0. Gut. 2024 Jan 5;73(2):361-371. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330616. PubMed 37734911 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06339801
Lead sponsor
Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín
Responsible party
Maria Marta Piskorz (Principal Investigator, Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 1, 2024
Start date
Dec 12, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 3, 2025

Study contacts

MARIA M PISKORZ, MD
Contact
neurogastrohc@gmail.com
5491133192885
JORGE A OLMOS, MD
Contact
jorge.a.olmos@gmail.com
5491154128577
JORGE A OLMOS, MD
principal investigator · HOSPITAL DE CLINICAS JOSE DE SAN MARTIN

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion