ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT06339645Updated Apr 1, 2024

Intravesical Platelet-rich Plasma Injection in Patients With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder-A Retrospective Study

An observational study in Safety and Effectiveness Between Intravesical Platelet-rich Plasma Injection in Patients With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder, sponsored by Hualien Tzu Chi General Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-01.

Sponsored by Hualien Tzu Chi General Hospital · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2024), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
658
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The correlation of safety and effectiveness between intravesical platelet-rich plasma injection in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder-A retrospective study to evaluate the correlation of safety and effectiveness between intravesical platelet-rich plasma injection of IC/BPS, with age of at least 20-84 years old in Taiwan of either sex with IC/BPS symptoms and proven of IC by cystoscopic hydrodistention. Patients who meet all eligibility requirements for entry into the study of intravesical PRP injection.

Read the detailed description

Introduction: Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the bladder characterized by symptoms such as frequency, urgency, nocturia, and lower abdominal pain. Despite being recognized for a hundred years, there has not been a definitive treatment method that can completely eliminate bladder inflammation. Various methods have been attempted, including bladder hydrodistention, anti-inflammatory drugs, steroid injections, and the use of bladder epithelial protectants such as Hyaluronic Acid. In recent years, the use of intravesical injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of IC/BPS has emerged; however, none of these methods have achieved the goal of long-term cure. Therefore, achieving remission of interstitial cystitis has been a persistent goal for urologists.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has emerged as a novel treatment modality in the past one to two decades, widely used for degenerative joint diseases and muscle injuries. This therapy involves extracting high concentrations of platelets mixed with serum from the patient's own blood, excluding red and white blood cells, and injecting this high-concentration platelet serum into the affected area. This exploits the various growth factors and cytokines abundant in platelets to promote wound healing and reduce chronic inflammation. PRP has shown promising results in many sports injuries and degenerative joint diseases over the past decade. As PRP is derived from the patient's own blood, it does not induce allergic reactions or produce any side effects.

PRP has been previously shown to effectively improve epithelial dysfunction and chronic inflammation in IC/BPS. We hope PRP injection can gradually eliminate inflammation within the bladder, and its various growth factors can facilitate the repair of damaged bladder epithelium. If this treatment proves effective, it could offer a better therapeutic option for many patients suffering from bladder symptoms due to interstitial cystitis.

Several patients have been enrolled since the initiation of clinical trials using intravesical injection of platelet-rich plasma for bladder treatment in 2016. However, data collection has been limited to single clinical trial studies. PRP has gradually become a routine treatment for patients with IC/BPS. Therefore, this study aims to comprehensively review the medical records of all patients who have received bladder PRP injections to clarify and understand the basic information and clinical examination data of patients with interstitial cystitis who have received bladder PRP injections from the past to the present.

Aim: This study also aims to understand interstitial cystitis further and investigate the safety and efficacy of bladder PRP injections for patients with interstitial cystitis.

Materials and Methods:

This retrospective study enrolled the patients who received intravesical PRP injection treatments in patients with IC/BPS from 2016/1/1 to 2023/10/21. We used the chart review and questionnaire collection, analyzed the patients' characteristics including age, gender, IC symptoms, and pain severity, and also collected anxiety severity all in the chart. Also, the voiding diary, maximum bladder capacity, urine biomarkers, and glomerulation grade were analyzed.

Assessment: The patients will be investigated using the chart review for the voiding diary (for frequency nocturia episodes per day), ICSI, IC problem index (ICPI), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of pain, patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC), global response assessment (GRA), maximal flow rate (Qmax), voided volume (Vol), and post-void residual urine (PVR) volume measurement at baseline and after treatment. Urine samples will also be obtained for urinary biomarkers determination at baseline and after different therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Safety and Effectiveness Between Intravesical Platelet-rich Plasma Injection in Patients With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder
03

In context

Cystitis, Interstitial

236 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystitis, Interstitial; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 658 is above the median of 100 across 63 observational studies indexed under Cystitis, Interstitial.

Browse Cystitis, Interstitial studies →

Lead sponsor

Hualien Tzu Chi General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with age of at least 20-84 years old in Taiwan of either sex with IC/BPS symptoms and proven of IC by cystoscopic hydrodistention

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • NIDDK criteria diagnostic IC/BPS, and received the intravesical PRP injection before

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. non-IC/BPS patients
  2. psychological disease was diagnosed
  3. non-NIDDK criteria (Hunner's ulcer type)
  4. Under-primary or illiterate respondents
  5. patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease and such as congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, poorly controlled hypertension, not able to receive regular follow up
  6. Patients with bladder outlet obstruction on enrollment
  7. Patients with post-void residual > 150ml
  8. Patients with an uncontrolled confirmed diagnosis of acute urinary tract infection
  9. Patients have laboratory abnormalities at screening
  10. Patients who cannot used urinary catheter to treat.
  11. Female patients who are pregnant, lactating, or without .
  12. Patients with any other serious disease considered by the investigator not in the condition to enter the trial
  13. Patients cannot record the voiding diary
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
658 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • ProcedurePRP

    Patients who meet all eligibility requirements for entry into the study of intravesical PRP injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Global response assessment (GRA)

    satisfaction by the patient (categorized into -3, -2,-1, 0, +1, +2, +3, indicating markedly worse to markedly improved ) after the treatment day

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Wan Ru Yu
    Hualien City, Outside U.S./Taiwan 970, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yu WR, Kuo HC. Functional bladder capacity can reflect the bladder condition and treatment outcome in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. World J Urol. 2026 Jan 17;44(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05937-2. PubMed 41546691 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Apr 2024; primary completion for May 2024, 1 month later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 25, 2024
First posted
Apr 1, 2024
StartEst.
Apr 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
May 22, 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
Apr 1, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 1, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06339645
Lead sponsor
Hualien Tzu Chi General Hospital
Responsible party
Wan Ru Yu (PI, Hualien Tzu Chi General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 1, 2024
Start date
Apr 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 22, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 1, 2024

Study contacts

Wan Ru Yu
Contact
wanzu666@gmail.com
0925051013
Wan Ru Yu
principal investigator · Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan,

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion