ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06326294Updated May 22, 2024

Assessment of the Effectiveness of TA Versus LEEP for Cervical Cancer Risk Reduction in WLHIV in Mozambique

An interventional study of Thermal ablation and LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE in HIV Infections, HPV Infection and CIN 2/3, sponsored by Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Mozambique. Recruiting at 1 site in Mozambique. Open to female participants aged 25 Years to 49 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-22.

Sponsored by Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Mozambique · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
4,844
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 49 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Given that WLWH are more likely to develop persistent HPV infection and CC, effective screening and the management and treatment of pre-cancerous cervical abnormalities is critical to decrease the global burden of cervical cancer. The vast majority of WLWH live in SSA, where resources are more constrained. Therefore, simple, affordable, and effective tools are needed for the prevention of cervical cancer in SSA. In this setting, the best method for treatment of screen-positive WLWH has not been determined. The proposed study will compare the effectiveness of TA vs. LEEP, for treating precursor lesions (CIN 2/3) and HPV infection in WLWH, identify the determinants of treatment failure, and develop a strategy to predict patients in whom treatment is likely to fail so that alternative treatments can be provided. Moreover, local evidence of the optimal method of treatments is necessary to inform health policy and promote adherence.

Read the detailed description

A. General purpose:

The goal of this study is to compare TA, an ablative cervical treatment modality, and LEEP, an excisional cervical treatment modality, in screen-positive WLWH patients, for eradication of hrHPV and effectiveness of treating biopsy-confirmed CIN 2/3.

B. Specific purposes

Primary Objectives:

  1. Compare the effectiveness of treating biopsy-confirmed CIN 2/3 by TA versus LEEP
  2. Compare the effectiveness of treating hrHPV infection by TA versus LEEP
  3. Assess pain and side effects/adverse events due to TA versus LEEP

Secondary Objectives:

  1. Identify the determinants of treatment failures
  2. Develop a deep learning-based automated visual evaluation tool that predicts treatment failure
02

Conditions studied

  • HIV Infections
  • HPV Infection
  • CIN 2/3
03

In context

HIV Infections

4,734 studies on the registry are indexed under HIV Infections; 244 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 4,844 is above the median of 80 across 3,489 interventional studies indexed under HIV Infections.

Browse HIV Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Mozambique is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 49 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ages 25-49 years;
  • confirmed infection;
  • physically and mentally willing and able to participate in the study, and provide .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • currently pregnant or \<6 weeks post-partum;
  • had a hysterectomy and no longer have a cervix;
  • a history of cervical cancer or treatment for cervical abnormalities; and
  • any medical, psychiatric, or other condition that would interfere with protocol adherence, assessment of safety, and/or ability/competence to provide .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
4,844 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Thermo ablation treatment

    Participants allocated in this group will be treated with thermo ablation. Before TA, perform biopsies of any acetowhite lesions by colposcopy and/or positive by AVE and an endocervical curettage (ECC); In women who do not have any lesions noted by colposcopy or AVE, one random cervical biopsy at the squamocolumnar junction and an endocervical curettage (ECC) will be obtained. TA is performed during the same exam (immediately following biopsies/ECC)TA will be done according to the manufacturer's instructions and specifications.

    Device: Thermal ablation

  • Other
    LEEP treatment

    Participants allocated in this group will be treated with LEEP. LEEP will be done according to standard procedure. No biopsies are taken, only LEEP is performed, unless clinically indicated.

    Procedure: LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE

Interventions

  • DeviceThermal ablation

    Thermal ablative uses heat (100°C to 120°C) to cause localized tissue damage at the cervical transformation zone and destroy the abnormal epithelium.

    Also known as: TA

  • ProcedureLOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE

    Cervical tissue excision

    Also known as: LEEP

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of treatment success rates for biopsy-confirmed CIN 2/3: Thermoablation (TA) vs. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP)

    The treatment success rate (12-month efficacy) of LEEP (pL) and that of ablation (pA) for participants with ablation-eligible CIN 2/3 will be measured by assessing the proportion of patients in each treatment group whose lesions completely regress or are successfully treated without recurrence over a defined follow-up period.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2027, 41 months after the start.

Of 393 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under HIV Infections, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 45. This study's planned 41 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 402 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 45.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 27, 2024
First posted
Mar 22, 2024
StartActual
Apr 17, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
May 22, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06326294
Lead sponsor
Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Mozambique
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 22, 2024
Start date
Apr 17, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 22, 2024

Study contacts

Edna Viegas, MD, PhD
Contact
edna.viegas@ins.gov.mz
+258823060500
Edna Nhacule, MD
Contact
edna.nhacule@ins.gov.mz
845210269
Edna Viegas, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Mozambique

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion