CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06317064Updated Feb 21, 2025

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Substance P/ NK1R Receptor in Primary Dysmenorrhea

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ibuprofen and Aprepitant in Primary Dysmenorrhea, sponsored by Lahore Medical Research Center, LLP. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-21.

Sponsored by Lahore Medical Research Center, LLP · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Dysmenorrhea is characterized as excruciating menstrual cramps of uterine origin and is one of the most prevalent gynecological illnesses. Substance P (SP) and NK1R mediate the symptoms of various pain disorders with chronic and/or neuropathic pain. Objective: To evaluate diagnostic and therapeutic potential of Substance P/ NK1R receptor in primary dysmenorrhea. Study Design: This was a randomized controlled trial which took place at Lahore Medical Research Center from March 2024 to October 2024. Non-probability convenient sampling techniques was used for sampling. A total of 40 female participants was included in the study who met specific criteria for inclusion. The study comprised of three phases, Phase 1 (Before medication), Phase 2 (NSAIDs) and Phase 3(Dexamethasone + Aprepitant). 10 females with no dysmenorrhea participated as controls. The study duration spanned three menstrual cycles. 20 dysmenhorric and 6 controls were analyzed for NK1R levels. Several assessment tools were also used in the study,

Read the detailed description

This was a randomized controlled trial which took place at Lahore Medical Research Center from March 2024 to October 2024. Non-probability convenient sampling techniques was used for sampling. A total of 40 female participants was included in the study who met specific criteria for inclusion. 10 females with no dysmenorrhea participated as controls. The study duration spanned three menstrual cycles, during which participants were divided into three Phases. Phase 1: Blood samples of all 30 patients were collected prior to any medication. Phase 2: All 30 participants in this phase used NSAIDs (Non-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs), during their dysmenorrhea period. Phase 3: All the patients from phase 2 (n=30) received NK1R antagonist "Dexamethasone (6mg) + Aprepitant (80mg)" for 2 days. Out of these patients, 20 dysmenhorric and 6 controls were analyzed for NK1R levels.

Data Collection

A 5cc blood sample was collected from each participant on the 2nd day of their menstrual cycle before any intervention. Another 5cc blood sample was collected on the 2nd day of the menstrual cycle after the first intervention. Another 5cc blood sample was collected on the 2nd day of the menstrual cycle after the 2nd intervention. Prior to and following the intervention, a complete blood count (CBC) was conducted to assess any changes in blood parameters. Serum was extracted from the collected blood samples for further analysis.

Human SP and Neurokinin-1 Receptor (NK1R) levels measurement Human SP and its antagonist NK1R levels were analyzed using ELISA technique. This analysis was performed thrice to investigate the role of Substance P and NK1R in menstrual pain before and after the intervention. BT Lab Human Substance P and NK1R ELISA kit was used to measure levels of SP and NK1R in serum samples of participants (Catalogue Numbers: E1528Hu, E6938Hu).

Assessment tools

The study's participants filled out a basic questionnaire meant to collect sociodemographic information and analyze a variety of parameters. Body Mass Index (BMI), Family History of Pain, Age at Menarche, Length of Menstrual Cycle, Age of Onset of Dysmenorrhea, and Sleep Duration were all included in these surveys. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart were among the other questionnaires used.

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Female participants' levels of pain were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). With a scale from 0 to 10, where 10 is the most excruciating pain possible, the VAS is a well-known measure for assessing pain perception. Participants were divided into three groups to reflect varied levels of pain severity based on their VAS ratings obtained throughout the first three consecutive days of both menstrual cycles: Mild Pain, Moderate Pain, and Severe Pain.

Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)

The female participants' eating patterns were assessed using the Nestle Nutrition Institute Mini Nutritional Assessment in order to look into any possible associations between their diet and menstrual discomfort. Participants who scored between 24 and 30 had good nutritional status, those who scored from 17 to 23.5 were at risk of malnutrition, and those who scored under 17 were poorly nourished.

Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)

The DASS-21 was used to evaluate the psychological health of our subjects and comprehend how it related to dysmenorrhea. Based on their stated levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, participants were divided into five groups using this scale: normal, mild, moderate, severe, and extremely severe. A score of 0 to 9 indicates normal, 10 to 13 indicates mild depression, 14 to 20 indicates moderate depression, 21 to 27 indicates severe depression, and 28 or above indicates extremely severe depression. Scores between 0 and 7 indicate normal anxiety, 8 to 9 indicate mild anxiety, 10 to 14 indicate moderate anxiety, 15 to 19 indicate severe anxiety, and 20 or more indicate extremely severe anxiety. For stress, 0-14 represents normal, 15-18 represents mild, 19-25 represents moderate, 26-33 represents severe, and 34+ represents really severe stress.

Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC)

The Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC), a self-administered pictorial assessment chart that assigns scores based on how much tampons and cotton-based sanitary pads stain throughout a menstrual cycle, was given to the patients as a tool to measure their menstrual blood volume [24-26]. Reliability of the PBAC has been shown [25, 26]. They were given guidelines by the researcher on how to utilize the PBAC. Hypomenorrhea was linked to PBAC scores of 10 or less, regular monthly flow was linked to PBAC scores of 10 to 99, and heavy menstrual bleeding was linked to PBAC scores of 100 or more for two months. Cotton pads were the only sanitary goods used. Software for statistical analysis was used to determine scores.

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was carried out using Graph Pad Prism 8.0.2, a statistical software package. The collected data, including questionnaire responses, CBC results, Substance P and NK1R levels, were analyzed to assess the effects of the interventions on menstrual pain and related factors. Two-way ANOVA test was used for analysis. P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by Ethical Review Board of Lahore Medical Research Center. The research followed declaration of Helsinki and written and informed consent was taken from all participants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Dysmenorrhea

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Substance P
  • Neurokinin 1 Receptor
  • Primary Dysmenorrhea
  • Aprepitant
  • Rosemary
  • Ibuprofen
03

In context

Dysmenorrhea

398 studies on the registry are indexed under Dysmenorrhea; 96 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 333 interventional studies indexed under Dysmenorrhea.

Browse Dysmenorrhea studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Lahore Medical Research Center, LLP as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

The participants must be unmarried women of reproductive age who have moderate to severe dysmenorrhea.

  • The participants must experience dysmenorrhea during most menstrual cycles to be included in the study.
  • For controls, they must not have dysmenorrhea.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Those with irregular or infrequent menstrual cycles.

  • Women who are taking oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) and using an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) excluded from the study.
  • Women who have reached menopause or have undergone a surgical procedure resulting in the cessation of menstruation excluded from the study.
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Women who taking any medication like sedatives and NSAIDs.
  • Women with PCOs, hysterectomy and uterine carcinoma will not be included.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    10 females with no dysmenorrhea participated as controls.

  • Experimental
    NSAIDs and Aprepitant group (Sequential)

    All 30 participants in this group used NSAIDs (Non-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs), during their dysmenorrhea period. Same patients from phase 2 (n=30) in next cycle received NK1R antagonist "Dexamethasone (6mg) + Aprepitant (80mg)" for 2 days.

    Drug: Ibuprofen and Aprepitant

Interventions

  • DrugIbuprofen and Aprepitant

    All 30 participants in this group used NSAIDs (Non-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs), during their dysmenorrhea period. Same patients from phase 2 (n=30) in next cycle received NK1R antagonist "Dexamethasone (6mg) + Aprepitant (80mg)" for 2 days.

    Also known as: NSAIDs, Neurokinin 1 Receptor antagonist

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale Score (Pain scale)

    Female participants' levels of pain were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). With a scale from 0 to 10, where 10 is the most excruciating pain possible, the VAS is a well-known measure for assessing pain perception. Participants were divided into three groups to reflect varied levels of pain severity based on their VAS ratings obtained throughout the first three consecutive days of both menstrual cycles: Mild Pain, Moderate Pain, and Severe Pain

    Time frame: At the end of one cycle (each cycle is of 28-3- days)

  2. Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) Score

    The female participants' eating patterns were assessed using the Nestle Nutrition Institute Mini Nutritional Assessment in order to look into any possible associations between their diet and menstrual discomfort. Participants who scored between 24 and 30 had good nutritional status, those who scored from 17 to 23.5 were at risk of malnutrition, and those who scored under 17 were poorly nourished.

    Time frame: At the end of one cycle (each cycle is of 28-3- days)

  3. DASS-21 (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale)

    The DASS-21 was used to evaluate the psychological health of our subjects and comprehend how it related to dysmenorrhea. Based on their stated levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, participants were divided into five groups using this scale: normal, mild, moderate, severe, and extremely severe. A score of 0 to 9 indicates normal, 10 to 13 indicates mild depression, 14 to 20 indicates moderate depression, 21 to 27 indicates severe depression, and 28 or above indicates extremely severe depression. Scores between 0 and 7 indicate normal anxiety, 8 to 9 indicate mild anxiety, 10 to 14 indicate moderate anxiety, 15 to 19 indicate severe anxiety, and 20 or more indicate extremely severe anxiety. For stress, 0-14 represents normal, 15-18 represents mild, 19-25 represents moderate, 26-33 represents severe, and 34+ represents really severe stress.

    Time frame: At the end of one cycle (each cycle is of 28-3- days)

  4. Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC)

    The Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC), a self-administered pictorial assessment chart that assigns scores based on how much tampons and cotton-based sanitary pads stain throughout a menstrual cycle, was given to the patients as a tool to measure their menstrual blood volume. Reliability of the PBAC has been shown. They were given guidelines by the researcher on how to utilize the PBAC. Hypomenorrhea was linked to PBAC scores of 10 or less, regular monthly flow was linked to PBAC scores of 10 to 99, and heavy menstrual bleeding was linked to PBAC scores of 100 or more for two months. Cotton pads were the only sanitary goods used. Software for statistical analysis was used to determine scores.

    Time frame: At the end of one cycle (each cycle is of 28-3- days)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Prof. Dr. Riffat Mehboob
    Lahore, Punjab 54000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06317064
Lead sponsor
Lahore Medical Research Center, LLP
Responsible party
Riffat Mehboob (Dr., Lahore Medical Research Center, LLP) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 19, 2024
Start date
Mar 15, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2024
Completion
Dec 15, 2024
Last update
Feb 21, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion