ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06301945INTHYMUpdated Mar 27, 2024

Artificial Intelligence Prediction Tool in Thymic Epithelial Tumors

An observational study in Thymic Epithelial Tumor, Thymic Carcinoma and Thymoma, sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-27.

Sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2023; still recruiting 3 years 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,020
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Thymic epithelial tumors are rare neoplasms in the anterior mediastinum. The cornerstone of the treatment is surgical resection. Administration of postoperative radiotherapy is usually indicated in patients with more extensive local disease, incomplete resection and/or more aggressive subtypes, defined by the WHO histopathological classification.

In this classification thymoma types A, AB, B1, B2, B3, and thymic carcinoma are distinguished. Studies have shown large discordances between pathologists in subtyping these tumors. Moreover, the WHO classification alone does not accurately predict the risk of recurrence, as within subtypes patients have divergent prognoses.

The investigators will develop AI models using digital pathology and relevant clinical variables to improve the accuracy of histopathological classification of thymic epithelial tumors, and to better predict the risk of recurrence.

In this multicentric and international project three existing databases will be used from Rotterdam, Maastricht and Lyon. For all models one database will be used to build AI models, and the other two for external validation.

The ultimate goal of this project is to develop AI models that support the pathologist in correctly subtyping thymic epithelial tumors, in order to prevent patients from under- or overtreatment with adjuvant radiotherapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thymic Epithelial Tumor
  • Thymic Carcinoma
  • Thymoma
  • Thymoma and Thymic Carcinoma

Keywords

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Digital pathology
03

In context

Thymic epithelial tumor

26 studies on the registry are indexed under Thymic epithelial tumor; 19 are open to participants now.

Browse Thymic epithelial tumor studies →

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 478 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Study Population:

This study focuses on individuals diagnosed with thymic epithelial tumors. The study includes patients from three datasets: Erasmus MC (710 patients), Maastro (137 patients), and University Hospital Lyon (181 patients).

Additional Information:

  • Erasmus MC (710 patients): Includes age, gender, and diagnosis information; each patient may have multiple whole slide images.
  • Maastro (137 patients): Each patient may have multiple whole slide images.
  • University Hospital Lyon (181 patients): Each patient may have multiple whole slide images.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants with specific diagnoses are eligible for inclusion in the study. The eligible diagnoses include various subtypes of thymoma and thymic carcinoma, specifically:

  • Thymoma A
  • Thymoma AB
  • Thymoma B1
  • Thymoma B2
  • Thymoma B3
  • Thymic Carcinoma

Inclusion is based on a consensus diagnosis with a level of agreement less than 70%. This criterion is applied during the training phase of the model.

Recurrence Criteria:

Participants with a documented recurrence outcome within a 5-year period are considered eligible for this aspect of the study. This criterion is primarily applied during the validation phase.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,020 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with TET

    Patients diagnosed with the following TET subtypes: * Thymoma Type A * Thymoma Type AB * Thymoma Type B1 * Thymoma Type B2 * Thymoma Type B3 * Thymic Carcinoma

    Diagnostic Test: Artificial Intelligence Diagnostics

  • Recurrence

    Patients with thymic epithelial tumors who have experienced recurrence.

    Diagnostic Test: Recurrence Prediction Tool

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testArtificial Intelligence Diagnostics

    AI Diagnostics uses advanced algorithms for precise histological image analysis to help diagnose disease, including subtype.

    Also known as: AI Diagnostics, AI Classification

  • Diagnostic testRecurrence Prediction Tool

    This AI tool evaluates thymic tumour data and other clinical data and calculates the risk of recurrence, with the aim of analysing whether there is an association with specific subtypes of thymic epithelial tumours and clinical data.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. WP1 - Databases/Data Pre-processing

    The EMC-dataset includes 179 TET-patients classified by experienced TET-pathologists. Cases with good agreement between pathologists will be used for training AI-models. Evaluation includes digitized pathology slides assessed by an international expert-panel. The MUMC-database (137 patients) and CHUL-database (181 patients) provide additional data, including clinical variables. Relevant factors include age, gender, tumor volume, stage, completeness of resection, autoimmune disorders, and treatment details.

    Time frame: M1-M18

Secondary outcomes

  1. WP2 - Deep Learning-Model for TET Classification and Recurrence Prediction

    This outcome aims to create an AI-framework with two principal goals. First, investigate TET-subtypes using four different models emphasizing cell type, morphological structures, and a combination. Second, classify patients based on recurrence outcome within 5 years. An ablation study will be conducted with state-of-the-art deep learning classifiers (ResNet, Inception).

    Time frame: M6-M32

Other outcomes

  1. WP3: Clinical Evaluation

    AI-models 1-3 will be built and validated on the EMC-database, while AI-model 4 will be built on the MUMC+-database and validated on both. Model performance will be assessed using sensitivity, specificity, negative/positive predictive value. Decision analysis curves will quantify the clinical benefit, identifying patient groups with the largest utility.

    Time frame: M6-M36

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wolf JL, van Nederveen F, Blaauwgeers H, Marx A, Nicholson AG, Roden AC, Strobel P, Timens W, Weissferdt A, von der Thusen J, den Bakker MA. Interobserver variation in the classification of thymic lesions including biopsies and resection specimens in an international digital microscopy panel. Histopathology. 2020 Nov;77(5):734-741. doi: 10.1111/his.14167. Epub 2020 Sep 24. PubMed 32506527 ↗
  • Molina TJ, Bluthgen MV, Chalabreysse L, de Montpreville VT, de Muret A, Dubois R, Hofman V, Lantuejoul S, le Naoures C, Mansuet-Lupo A, Parrens M, Piton N, Rouquette I, Secq V, Girard N, Marx A, Besse B. Impact of expert pathologic review of thymic epithelial tumours on diagnosis and management in a real-life setting: A RYTHMIC study. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jan;143:158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.011. Epub 2020 Dec 11. PubMed 33316754 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Aug 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2027, 48 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 4, 2024
First posted
Mar 8, 2024
StartActual
Aug 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Aug 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 1, 2027
Last update
Mar 27, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06301945
Collaborators
Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands, Hospices Civils de Lyon
Responsible party
Anna Salut Esteve Domínguez (PhD student, Erasmus Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 8, 2024
Start date
Aug 1, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 27, 2024

Study contacts

Anna Salut Esteve Domínguez
Contact
a.estevedominguez@erasmusmc.nl
0107043491

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion