CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06299566Updated Mar 8, 2024

Perceptions of the CF Screening Protocol Incorporating NGS

An observational study in Cystic Fibrosis, sponsored by King's College London. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 99 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-08.

Sponsored by King's College London · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
10 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Newborn bloodspot screening (from now on referred to as screening) for cystic fibrosis (CF) became part of the national screening programme in 2007. Screening for CF is also well established internationally. The current process works well but has some disadvantages: carrier reporting - which is not the intention of CF screening in the UK (\~200 pa); need for repeat samples which can be costly and contribute to parental worry (\~300 pa.); mutation panels not fully reflecting the ethnic diversity of the birth population; identification of children designated as CF screen positive, inconclusive diagnosis (CFSPID) which can cause uncertainty (\~20-30 pa).

A trial of NGS in one centre in the UK, for one year found that it was technically feasible at reasonable cost and with an acceptable turn around time. In addition, the trial determined that using NGS could mitigate against some of the disadvantages described above.

The purpose of this piece of work was to:

  1. Gather, compare and analyse the views of a range of stakeholders on the proposed CF screening protocol incorporating NGS.
  2. Use the outcomes to inform discussions and decisions by the fetal, maternal and child health (FMCH) group and UK National Screening Committee (NSC) about the proposed protocol
  3. Consider what generalisable information on the views of stakeholders on newborn screening could be generated from this exercise to inform other FMCH and UK NSC discussions
  4. Evaluate and learn from the exercise to inform future stakeholder engagement activities by the UK NSC and screening programmes.
02

Conditions studied

  • Cystic Fibrosis
03

In context

Cystic Fibrosis

1,581 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystic Fibrosis; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 150 is above the median of 85 across 482 observational studies indexed under Cystic Fibrosis.

Browse Cystic Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

King's College London is the lead sponsor of 506 studies on the registry; 125 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

People with experience of CF, CFSPID or carrier status and health professionals with experience of caring for them.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults aged over 18 years of age who:

    (i) Were diagnosed with CF in childhood (ii) Were diagnosed with CF as adults (including those who would have been identified as CFSPID if NBS had been available and reporting it) (iii) Are carriers of CF (including parents/relatives of children/adults with CF and adults identified via other routes e.g. private testing)

  2. Parents (aged over 18 years) of children identified through NBS who:

    (iv) Have CF (v) Are carriers of CF (vi) Have a CFSPID designation (vii) Have received a false positive NBS result for CF (viii) Have received a false negative NBS result for CF

  3. Children aged over 10 years of age* who:

    (ix) Have CF (x) Have a CFSPID designation (xi) Are carriers of CF and have been informed of their carrier status

    *Ten years of age has been chosen for both pragmatic reasons and because this represents the age at which children will begin preparing for transition to adult services and therefore a period of increased independence and/or preparing for specialist review

  4. Professionals involved in processing and/or communicating positive NBS results for CF to families or supporting families in health, community or education settings e.g. doctors, nurses, geneticists, genetic counsellors, midwives, social workers, dieticians, physiotherapists, teachers, university lecturers, charities.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria for those affected by CF:

  1. Adults or children with non CF related co-morbidities that are likely to influence their perception of the proposed CF screening protocol incorporating NGS
  2. Parents whose child has died prior to being approached to be involved in the study
  3. Adults or children unable to understand the PIS and give informed consent/assent respectively
  4. Adults or children whose recruitment is contraindicated on psychosocial or medical grounds (identified by their health visitor or specialist team).

Exclusion criteria for professionals:

Those not involved in processing, communicating positive NBS results for CF to families or supporting families in health, community or education settings.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • People with experience of cystic fibrosis

    Adults or children with experience of CF.

  • Health professionals

    Health professionals with experience of caring for people with experience of CF.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Focus groups/interviews/questionnaires exploring stakeholder views of the proposed CF screening protocol incorporating NGS.

    Focus groups/interviews/questionnaires exploring stakeholder views, experiences and conceptualized harms/benefits in relation to the proposed CF screening protocol incorporating NGS

    Time frame: February 2023

Secondary outcomes

  1. Focus groups/interviews/questionnaires exploring stakeholder views on equivocal, carrier, false positives/negatives results, late onset/uncertain conditions

    Focus groups/interviews/questionnaires exploring stakeholder views on equivocal, carrier, false positives/negatives results, late onset/uncertain conditions identified early in life (infertility, potential CF), missed CF diagnoses, as well as the way these outcomes are prioritised and ordered when considering NGS for CF NBS

    Time frame: February 2023

  2. Q sorts used to develop data and materials FMCH and UK NSC can use to engage stakeholders

    Q sorts used to develop data and materials FMCH and UK NSC can use to engage stakeholders more widely with discussions about a) the proposed protocol, and b) wider use of genomic testing in NBS

    Time frame: February 2023

  3. Surveys to explore principles of engagement for stakeholders

    Surveys to explore principles of engagement for this population, building on the 'golden rules' but with context specific guidance under each that can be used in future commissioning

    Time frame: February 2023

07

Study locations

1 site
  • King's College London
    London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Data are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to ethical constraints

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06299566
Lead sponsor
King's College London
Collaborators
University of Warwick, Coventry University, Barts & The London NHS Trust, Cystic Fibrosis Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 8, 2024
Start date
Jan 19, 2022
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2023
Completion
Feb 28, 2023
Last update
Mar 8, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion