ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06293118Updated Nov 6, 2026

The Effects of Ischemic Conditioning in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease

An interventional study of Ischemic conditioning group and Sham group in Parkinson Disease, sponsored by Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 6, 2026Start date movedStudy completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Ischemic conditioning (IC) is a promising therapy that can mimic the physiological effects of physical exercise. IC consists of using a cuff to measure blood pressure and calibrate 200 mmHg on the upper or lower limb. Thus, at alternating intervals of 5 minutes, ischemia or reperfusion occurs, depending on whether the cuff is inflated or deflated. IC induces changes in spinal cord excitability for the last reflex reactions of recruited motoneurons with improved balance control in healthy young people and improved learning in the elderly. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the chronic effect of IC on the cognitive performance of patients with Parkinson's disease. Furthermore, the investigators will evaluate secondary outcomes such as the motor function, mobility, quality of life, and immunological responses.

Read the detailed description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that causes a variety of motor and non-motor symptoms. Typically, patients with PD suffer from disabilities and secondary complications even when the disease is optimally treated, and many patients still have sedentary lifestyles, which in turn result in higher rates of mortality and comorbidity. Physical activity is an essential element in maintaining daily functional capabilities and quality of life. However, patients with PD have motor and non-motor deficits that can prevent or limit physical exercise, such as running or resistance exercise. Ischemic conditioning (IC) is a promising therapy that can mimic the physiological effects of physical exercise. IC consists of using a cuff to measure blood pressure, calibrated between 180 and 200 mmHg on the upper or lower limb. Thus, at alternating intervals of 5 minutes, ischemia or reperfusion occurs, depending on whether the cuff is inflated or deflated. IC induces changes in spinal cord excitability for the last reflex reactions of recruited motoneurons with improved balance control in healthy young people and improved learning in the elderly. Recently, IC has been shown to improve cognitive performance in neurological patients with stroke, subcortical ischemia, and vascular dementia. However, there are no studies that have evaluated the effect of IC on cognitive performance in patients with PD. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the chronic effect of IC on the cognitive performance of patients with PD. Furthermore, the investigators intend to evaluate other secondary outcomes such as motor function, mobility, quality of life, and immunological responses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ischemic conditioning
  • immune system
  • motor function
  • cognitive performance
  • Parkinson disease
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,086 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 52 is above the median of 40 across 3,353 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein is the lead sponsor of 147 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • PD patients aged 40 years or older;
  • Diagnosis of PD without cognitive complaints or with complaints, but without impact on daily activities;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or peripheral neuropathy;
  • Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (BP>160/100mmHg);
  • Uncontrolled diabetes (Fasting glucose > 250mg/dl, peripheral retinopathy or diabetic ketoacidosis);
  • Uncontrolled dyslipidemia (total chol > 220mg/dL);
  • Pre-existing diseases;
  • Infectious conditions for less than 1 month;
  • Neurological problems that prevent training from being carried out;
  • History of anemia, cerebral vascular disease, myocardial infarction in the last 6 months;
  • Previous deep vein thrombosis;
  • Smoking \< 6 months;
  • Symptomatic peripheral arterial obstructive disease;
  • Cognitive dysfunction: Moca \< 24.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
52 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ischemic conditioning group

    Therapy will be performed bilaterally on the upper limbs. The ischemic conditioning group will perform 4 times, 8 cycles with 30 seconds of ischemia (80 - 200 mmHg) with 5 seconds of reperfusion in each cycle. Ischemia cycles are controlled by a device (KAATSU C4 - KAATSU GLOBAL / USA) In the first cycle, participants will be subjected to pressures of 80 to 150 mmHg. In the 3 subsequent cycles, pressures from 130 to 200 mmHg will be applied.

    Device: Ischemic conditioning group

  • Sham comparator
    Sham group

    Participants in the control group (Sham) will perform the same number of sets and 4 cycles, with equalized time to ischemia (4 minutes) and (40 seconds) reperfusion timing, but at a non-occlusive pressure of 30 mmHg (KAATSU C4 device)

    Device: Sham group

Interventions

  • DeviceIschemic conditioning group

    The ischemic conditioning protocol will consist of a period of 12 weeks (24 sessions) with a frequency of 2 weekly sessions lasting between 15 and 20 minutes each. Therapy will be performed bilaterally on the upper limbs. The ischemic conditioning group will perform 4 times, 8 cycles with 30 seconds of ischemia (80 - 200 mmHg) with 5 seconds of reperfusion in each cycle. Ischemia cycles are controlled by a device (KAATSU C4 - KAATSU GLOBAL / USA) with customized ischemia programs, partially restricting blood flow through special pressure cuffs that are internally valved, providing greater comfort and safety for these patients who typically have stiffness in the affected limb and localized muscle pain. In the first cycle, participants will be subjected to pressures of 80 to 150 mmHg. In the 3 subsequent cycles, pressures from 130 to 200 mmHg will be applied.

  • DeviceSham group

    In the sham group, participants will complete the same number of sets (4) and 4 cycles, with equalized time to ischemia (4 minutes) and (40 seconds) reperfusion timing, but at a non-occlusive pressure of 30 mmHg. Device, cuff placement, instructions, staff contact, and session duration will be standardized across groups.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Montreal cognitive assesment

    Maximum score: 30 points; Normal cognition: 26-30 points; Mild cognitive impairment (MCI): Below 26 points

    Time frame: Before intervention and at week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39

    The overall score ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher scores indicating a greater negative impact of Parkinson's Disease on the patient's quality of life.

    Time frame: Before intervention and at week 12

  2. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale

    0-260 points: A higher score indicates greater impairment

    Time frame: Time Frame: Before intervention and at week 12

  3. Timed up and go

    \<10 seconds: Individuals are generally able to perform most daily activities independently without assistance; 10-19 seconds: Indicates independence in most daily activities but may suggest slight mobility limitations; 20-29 seconds: Suggests the need for assistance with mobility, especially for more challenging tasks; ≥30 seconds: Indicates a high fall risk, and the individual likely needs assistance with many daily tasks and may require mobility aids.

    Time frame: Before intervention and at week 12

  4. Assessment of cellular and soluble immune response

    The patient's peripheral blood will be collected in three EDTA tubes of 5 mL each before and after 12 weeks of application of the ischemic conditioning protocol. From the blood samples, plasma will be obtained for quantification of soluble mediators, followed by the isolation/storage of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC or Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell) for phenotypic characterization of subpopulations of T and B lymphocytes, NK cells, myeloids and monocytes

    Time frame: Before intervention and at week 12

  5. Quantifications of systemic soluble mediators

    Initially, the EDTA tubes containing the blood will be centrifuged for 5 minutes at 400 x g and 20 ºC to separate the plasma. The collected plasma will be aliquoted into cryotubes and stored at -80ºC until the tests are carried out. Quantification of systemic soluble mediators will be performed using the MILLIPLEX® Human Cytokine/Chemokine/Growth Factor Panel A Kit H - Immunology Multiplex Assay (Merck Millipore, Massachusetts, USA). The panel of analytes included chemokines, growth factors, pro-inflammatory cytokines and regulatory cytokines: FGF-2/FGF-basic, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFNa2,IFNy, IL-1a, IL-1b, IL-1RA , IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8/CXCL8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40), IL-12 (p70), IL-13, IL-15, IL -17A/CTLA8, IL-18, IP-10/CXCL10, MCP-1/CCL2, MCP-3/CCL7, M-CSF, MIG/CXCL9, MIP-1a/CCL3, MIP-1b/CCL4, PDGF-AB /BB, RANTES/CCL5, TNFa, TNFb/Lymphotoxin-a, VEGF-A, HIF-1ą. The PCR, BNDF, and Irisin proteins will be measured using single-plex assays.

    Time frame: Before intervention and at week 12

  6. PBMC acquisition and flow cytometry

    Finally, a minimum of 100,000 events will be acquired on the BD LSRFortessa™ flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).

    Time frame: Before intervention and at week 12

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Poewe et al. Parkinson disease. Nat Rev 2017;3:1-21. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.13
  • Dickson DW, Braak H, Duda JE, Duyckaerts C, Gasser T, Halliday GM, Hardy J, Leverenz JB, Del Tredici K, Wszolek ZK, Litvan I. Neuropathological assessment of Parkinson's disease: refining the diagnostic criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Dec;8(12):1150-7. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70238-8. PubMed 19909913 ↗
  • Kaushik S, Cuervo AM. Proteostasis and aging. Nat Med. 2015 Dec;21(12):1406-15. doi: 10.1038/nm.4001. PubMed 26646497 ↗
  • Bose A, Beal MF. Mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson's disease. J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 1:216-231. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13731. Epub 2016 Aug 21. PubMed 27546335 ↗
  • Poewe W. Clinical measures of progression in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2009;24 Suppl 2:S671-6. doi: 10.1002/mds.22600. PubMed 19877235 ↗
  • Post B, Merkus MP, de Bie RM, de Haan RJ, Speelman JD. Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale motor examination: are ratings of nurses, residents in neurology, and movement disorders specialists interchangeable? Mov Disord. 2005 Dec;20(12):1577-84. doi: 10.1002/mds.20640. PubMed 16116612 ↗
  • Schapira AHV, Chaudhuri KR, Jenner P. Non-motor features of Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul;18(7):435-450. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.62. Epub 2017 Jun 8. PubMed 28592904 ↗
  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. PubMed 15817019 ↗
  • Xu R, He Q, Wang Y, Yang Y, Guo ZN. Therapeutic Potential of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Vascular Cognitive Impairment. Front Cell Neurosci. 2021 Aug 3;15:706759. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2021.706759. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34413726 ↗
  • Loukogeorgakis SP, Williams R, Panagiotidou AT, Kolvekar SK, Donald A, Cole TJ, Yellon DM, Deanfield JE, MacAllister RJ. Transient limb ischemia induces remote preconditioning and remote postconditioning in humans by a K(ATP)-channel dependent mechanism. Circulation. 2007 Sep 18;116(12):1386-95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.653782. Epub 2007 Aug 27. PubMed 17724264 ↗
  • Strijdom H, Friedrich SO, Hattingh S, Chamane N, Lochner A. Hypoxia-induced regulation of nitric oxide synthase in cardiac endothelial cells and myocytes and the role of the PI3-K/PKB pathway. Mol Cell Biochem. 2009 Jan;321(1-2):23-35. doi: 10.1007/s11010-008-9906-2. Epub 2008 Sep 14. PubMed 18791856 ↗
  • Sutter EN, Mattlage AE, Bland MD, Cherry-Allen KM, Harrison E, Surkar SM, Gidday JM, Chen L, Hershey T, Lee JM, Lang CE. Remote Limb Ischemic Conditioning and Motor Learning: Evaluation of Factors Influencing Response in Older Adults. Transl Stroke Res. 2019 Aug;10(4):362-371. doi: 10.1007/s12975-018-0653-8. Epub 2018 Aug 7. PubMed 30088217 ↗
  • Guo ZN, Guo WT, Liu J, Chang J, Ma H, Zhang P, Zhang FL, Han K, Hu HH, Jin H, Sun X, Simpson DM, Yang Y. Changes in cerebral autoregulation and blood biomarkers after remote ischemic preconditioning. Neurology. 2019 Jul 2;93(1):e8-e19. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007732. Epub 2019 May 29. PubMed 31142636 ↗
  • He Z, Xu N, Qi S. Remote ischemic preconditioning improves the cognitive function of elderly patients following colon surgery: A randomized clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr;96(17):e6719. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006719. PubMed 28445286 ↗
  • Zhou D, Ding J, Ya J, Pan L, Bai C, Guan J, Wang Z, Jin K, Yang Q, Ji X, Meng R. Efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning on improving WMHs and cognition in very elderly patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Aging (Albany NY). 2019 Jan 28;11(2):634-648. doi: 10.18632/aging.101764. PubMed 30689549 ↗
  • Liao Z, Bu Y, Li M, Han R, Zhang N, Hao J, Jiang W. Remote ischemic conditioning improves cognition in patients with subcortical ischemic vascular dementia. BMC Neurol. 2019 Aug 23;19(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1435-y. PubMed 31443692 ↗
  • Movement Disorder Society Task Force on Rating Scales for Parkinson's Disease. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS): status and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2003 Jul;18(7):738-50. doi: 10.1002/mds.10473. PubMed 12815652 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Aug 2028, 19 months later.

Of 1,291 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Parkinson Disease, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 19 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,367 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Nov 6, 2026: start Oct 2026 → Dec 2026 and completion Sep 2028 → Dec 2028.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 19, 2024
First posted
Mar 5, 2024
StartEst.
Dec 15, 2026was Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2028was Sep 2028
Last update
Nov 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Oct 1, 2026→Dec 15, 2026
Nov 6, 2026
Study completion
Sep 1, 2028→Dec 1, 2028
Nov 6, 2026
Enrollment
44→52
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    Start date Oct 1, 2026→Dec 15, 2026
    Study completion Sep 1, 2028→Dec 1, 2028
    Enrollment 50→52
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Sep 29, 2026
    Enrollment 44→50

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06293118
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 5, 2024
Start date
Dec 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

SAMUEL AMORIM DE SOUZA, Master
Contact
samuel.amorim.s@gmail.com
11983331912
Kenneth J Gollob, PhD
Contact
kjgollob.einstein@gmail.com
31 996719224
Kenneth Gollob, PhD
principal investigator · Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion