CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06291714ClearsightUpdated Apr 3, 2025

Non-invasive Measurement of the Hypotension Prediction Index for the Reduction of Intraoperative Hypotension

An interventional study of GDT-based hemodynamic management based on Clearsight device in Intraoperative Hypotension, Acute Kidney Injury and Myocardial Injury After Non-cardiac Surgery, sponsored by University of Giessen. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 45 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-03.

Sponsored by University of Giessen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In order to reduce the incidence of IOH, various goal-directed therapy (GDT) protocols have already been introduced with success regarding the reduction of postoperative AKI and MINS. However, these studies used an invasive hemodynamic monitoring which offered a continuous surveillance of the blood pressure. In contrast, standard non-invasive blood pressure monitoring results in a blind gap between two measurements (mostly three or five minutes). In order to address this limitation, different continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring devices have been introduced. The next evolutional step of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring was to prevent IOH before their onset by using the Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI). Based on the Edward ́s monitoring platform, HPI is a monitoring tool which aims to predict IOH (defined as MAP\<65 mmHg for at least one minute) up to 15 min before its onset. The underlying machine learning based algorithm uses analyses features from the pressure waveform and was first calculated from a large retrospective data set of surgical patients and subsequently validated in a prospective cohort. In this study HPI showed a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 87% for predicting IOH 15 min before its onset. Since then, own and studies of other working groups confirmed the effective prevention of IOH by the use of HPI-based GDT. Until today the arterial waveform analysis was dependent on invasive arterial measurement but since Edwards Lifesciences already promoted the start of the HPI on the ClearSight platform a non-invasive measurement will soon be possible.

Further, until now it has not yet been proven that the perioperative use of a continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring has a beneficial effect on the patient´s outcome.

Study objectives The aim of the study is to investigate whether a hemodynamic protocol based on continuous non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (ClearSight system) compared to standard care can reduce the incidence of IOH, postoperative AKI, and MINS in patients undergoing major trauma and orthopedic surgery.

Read the detailed description

Complications related to intraoperative hypotension (IOH) can be detected in most organ systems of which renal failure poses a relevant complication in the perioperative phase. Acute kidney injury (AKI) affects up to 25 % of patients attending the intensive care unit (ICU). Currently, serum creatinine and urea display the most common parameters used to detect AKI, but it may take a day or more for serum creatinine levels to accumulate in the blood of a patient with an AKI. For this reason, it may not reflect real time kidney damage or loss of function. To overcome this limitation, the cell cycle arrest biomarkers TIMP-2- and IGFBP7-quantification (Nephrocheck) has been successfully evaluated for the detection of AKI. The main advantage of both parameters is the opportunity of early detection of AKI and its point-of-care design, which makes them especially for the use on the ICU valuable.

Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) displays another adverse outcome associated to IOH and endangers particularly patients with an age of 45 years and older and approximately 1% of all patients suffering of MINS die within 30 days after non-cardiac surgery.

In order to reduce the incidence of IOH, various goal-directed therapy (GDT) protocols have already been introduced with success regarding the reduction of postoperative AKI and MINS. However, these studies used an invasive hemodynamic monitoring which offered a continuous surveillance of the blood pressure. In contrast, standard non-invasive blood pressure monitoring results in a blind gap between two measurements (mostly three or five minutes). In order to address this limitation, different continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring devices have been introduced. The next evolutional step of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring was to prevent IOH before their onset by using the Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI). Based on the Edward ́s monitoring platform, HPI is a monitoring tool which aims to predict IOH (defined as MAP\<65 mmHg for at least one minute) up to 15 min before its onset. Until today the arterial waveform analysis was dependent on invasive arterial measurement but since Edwards Lifesciences already promoted the start of the HPI on the ClearSight platform a non-invasive measurement will soon be possible.

Further, until now it has not yet been proven that the perioperative use of a continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring has a beneficial effect on the patient´s outcome. Especially, a GDT based on non-invasive blood pressure monitoring might not only be able to reduce the incidence of IOH but also of the occurrence of postoperative renal failure.

2.1 Study hypothesis 2.1.1 Primary study hypothesis The perioperative use of non-invasive HPI-guided GDT reduces the incidence of IOH in patients undergoing major trauma and orthopedic surgery.

2.1.2 Secondary study hypothesis

  • The perioperative use of non-invasive HPI-guided GDT reduces the occurrence of postoperative renal failure in patients undergoing major trauma and orthopedic surgery.
  • The perioperative use of non-invasive HPI-guided GDT reduces the occurrence of postoperative MINS in patients undergoing major trauma and orthopedic surgery.

2.2 Study objectives The aim of the study is to investigate whether a hemodynamic protocol based on continuous non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (ClearSight system) compared to standard care can reduce the incidence of IOH, postoperative AKI, and MINS in patients undergoing major trauma and orthopedic surgery.

3 Methodology 3.1 Study design The study is designed as a monocentric randomized prospective interventional trial comparing goal directed hemodynamic management using continuous non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (ClearSight system) to standard care.

3.2 Study centers University Hospital Giessen, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine

3.3 Study Population 3.3.1 Study groups Major Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery

3.4 Working plan 3.4.1 Preoperative Assessment

Patients are recruited before surgery after checking inclusion and exclusion criteria. Informed consent is obtained at this time. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the two groups after achieving the patient´s informed consent. Further, the following basic characteristics are obtained:

  • Age, sex, height, weight, ASA score
  • Pre-existing conditions (hypertension, coronary heart disease with and without history of myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes)
  • Previous major surgeries
  • Current prescription of medication

Furthermore, the following laboratory results will be gained:

  • Blood cell count
  • Global coagulatory function (Internationalized Ratio, thromboplastine time, fibrinogen levels)
  • Parameters of renal function (Creatinine, urea, Nephrocheck, blood and urinary mitochondrial DNA)
  • Parameters of cardiac function (Troponin I, Creatinine kinase, Myoglobin, Brain Natriuretic Peptide)
  • Inflammatory Parameters (C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin)
  • Parameters of endothelial function (Angiopoietins 1 and 2, Syndecan-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)), Bio-ADM

3.4.2 Time Points The study time points are defined as followed: prior to surgery as well as immediately, 24, 72, and 168 hours after surgery (depending on the duration of hospital stay). At any time point clinical data, blood and urine will be collected (depending on the duration of hospital stay).

3.4.3 Perioperative Management 3.4.3.1 Induction and Maintenance of anesthesia All patients receive the standard hemodynamic monitoring (electrocardiogram, non-invasive blood pressure, and plethysmography). Non-invasive blood pressure will be measured every three minutes.

Independently of the randomized study group, induction of anesthesia will be performed with fentanyl, propofol, and cis-atracurium. Dosages will be chosen according to the patient´s age and body weight as well as pre-existing diseases according to the assessment of the attending physician. After intubation, all patients are ventilated with a tidal volume of 8 ml/kg ideal bodyweight and with regard to the capnography (target end-tidal CO2 of 35-40 mmHg). The control group will be managed according to the investigators´ SOP with the aim of an MAD \&gt; 65mmHg.

3.4.3.2 Management of interventional group patients Prior to the surgery the rest cardiac index and contractility (dp/dt) must be quantified. For this purpose, the cardiac index will be measured in the preoperative night by applicating the HPI ClearSight system through a study team member. A nighttime cardiac index is accepted when more than three reliable measurements were recorded in rest over a time period of 60 minutes. If the rest cardiac index is not available throughout the night because the patient´s sleep is altered by the measurements, the awake cardiac index will be quantified until the monitoring is stopped for the night sleep of the patient. This mean baseline measurements (CI and dp/dt) will then be the target cardiac index throughout the study algorithm (figure 1). In case no sleep measurement was achievable, the awake measurement will be accounted as baseline value. The perioperative study intervention period starts with the beginning of anesthesia and ends at the end of surgery. Intraoperative mean arterial pressure will be maintained at least at 65 mmHg and cardiac index and dp/dt will be individually optimized according to the GDT algorithm.

3.5 Data Processing Data collection is carried out consistently on pre-defined time-points in the investigators´ electronic patient data management system into a separate study database (Microsoft Excel).

The collected data is pseudonymised in the database based on a random key method. The chart with the patient data and decrypting keys is kept in the study center for at least 15 years after the end of the study (publication). Data anonymization is intentionally not performed to give patients the option for data insight or deletion of their data in the future.

Data management and evaluation is performed by the study team.

3.6 Patient number and Biometrics The aim of the study is to show the impact of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring on the incidence of IOH in a cohort of trauma and orthopedic surgery. Sample size calculation was performed with regard to a recent study by Maheshwari et al. who investigated the effect of HPI on the prevention of hypotension. This study was chosen because the primary endpoint, respectively the definition of hypotension (MAP\<65 mmHg), was identical to the investigators´ study and they investigated also non-cardiac surgical patients. In this study, the mean number of hypotensive periods (given as an area under the curve of MAP ≤65 mmHg) of patients without hemodynamic management accounted to 34.2 [8,5-112.7] compared to 32.7 [6.3-102] in patients with hemodynamic measurement. Aiming for an alpha of 0.05 and power of 0.95, the sample size calculation resulted in 66 patients per study group (total 132 patients, based on the use of the Wilcoxon test). In order to address potential dropouts (estimated drop-out rate 10-20%) the investigators chose to increase the patients numbers to 75 patients in each study group.

Next to the target parameters, data of the hemodynamic and respiratory function will be achieved as well as of the anesthetic and hemodynamic management (please see CRF). Furthermore, general characteristics such as age, gender, body mass index, as well as pre-existing conditions and prescriptions will be assessed.

For the target variables, the results will be investigated and analyzed descriptively (e.g., checked for distribution). Metric characteristics (mean and standard deviation) as well as median and interquartile difference and achieved frequencies (with a percentage specification) will be determined. As part of the exploratory analysis, the structural equilibrium (homogeneity) of the treatment groups will also be checked.

Depending on the distribution of the observation values, appropriate test methods are used.

The outcome of the statistical testing will be controlled for influence of secondary parameters, as there are suspected reasons for hypotension, type and dosage of vasopressors used during the procedure, as well as type and dosage of inotropic medication.

All analysis will be done using R-Plus scripting (R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org/).

3.7 Benefit - Risk assessment 3.7.1 Potential benefit Based on a continuous monitoring by additional monitoring system an early detection of potential life-threatening events and acute kidney injury is possible. This can result in an optimization of the patients' therapy and a better outcome.

3.7.2 Potential Risks The presented study is an interventional study. The potential risks are marginal. The usage of an additional non-invasive cardiac output monitoring is minimal.

The time points of blood samples for the study are in line with routine sampling. Based on this, there is no additional risk for the patient.

3.7.3 Benefit/ Risk analysis The benefit for the patients is additional monitoring, based on an additional monitoring device and the supervising study doctor, who can support the treating anesthesiologist with information in potentially critical situations. Thereby, it is possible to treat early goal-directed and possibly improve the patient´s outcome. Considering the potential benefits of the generated information for the patient in comparison to the expected risks, the beneficial effect is overbalanced.

The expected gain in knowledge from this study could be used for optimizing perioperative care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intraoperative Hypotension
  • Acute Kidney Injury
  • Myocardial Injury After Non-cardiac Surgery

Keywords

  • Intraoperative Hypotension
  • Hypotension Prediction Index
  • Clearsight system
03

In context

Acute Kidney Injury

1,595 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Kidney Injury; 371 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 100 across 763 interventional studies indexed under Acute Kidney Injury.

Browse Acute Kidney Injury studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Giessen is the lead sponsor of 91 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing major trauma or orthopedic surgery in supine position, which is defined as:

    • Reconstructive Surgery of the pelvis (e.g., stabilization of fractures)
    • Total hip arthroplasty
    • Surgery of the proximal femur (e.g., stabilization of fractures)
    • Total knee arthroplasty
    • Surgery of the spine

      • Performance of general anesthesia with planned duration of >90min
      • Age ≥ 45 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Predefined exclusion criteria are:
  • Planned invasive blood pressure monitoring
  • Participation in another interventional study
  • Pregnancy and nursing mothers
  • Surgery without controlled mechanical ventilation
  • ASA I or IV
  • Arterial Fibrillation
  • Allergy against gelantine
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Interventional group

    GDT-therapy guided hemodynamic management based on Clearsight system

    Device: GDT-based hemodynamic management based on Clearsight device

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Clearsight-monitor is blinded but records standard hemodynamic care

Interventions

  • DeviceGDT-based hemodynamic management based on Clearsight device

    Intraoperative use of a HPI-guided hemodynamic goal-directed protocol based on the non-invasive measurement of HPI (Clearsight system)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of the frequency of intraoperative hypotension

    Change of the frequency of intraoperative hypotension (defined as MAP below 65mmHg, frequency ((n)/h)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Change of the absolute duration of of intraoperative hypotension

    Change of the absolute duration of intraoperative hypotension (defined as MAP below 65mmHg, unit: minutes)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Change of the relative duration of intraoperative hypotension

    Change of the relative duration of intraoperative hypotension (defined as MAP below 65mmHg, unit: percentage of total anesthesia time)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. AKI

    Occurrence of an AKI (according to the KDIGO criteria or an increase of Nephrocheck \> 0.3 (ng/ml)\^2/1000; both parameters will be presented in the results for AKI)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. MINS

    Occurrence of MINS (TNI exceeding the 99th percentile of the normal population)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alyabsi M, Gaid R, Alqunaibet A, Alaskar A, Mahmud A, Alghamdi J. Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on the prevalence of elevated blood pressure and hypertension: a cross-sectional analysis of 10 799 individuals. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 31;10(12):e041973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041973. PubMed 33384395 ↗
  • Bijker JB, van Klei WA, Kappen TH, van Wolfswinkel L, Moons KG, Kalkman CJ. Incidence of intraoperative hypotension as a function of the chosen definition: literature definitions applied to a retrospective cohort using automated data collection. Anesthesiology. 2007 Aug;107(2):213-20. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000270724.40897.8e. PubMed 17667564 ↗
  • van Waes JA, van Klei WA, Wijeysundera DN, van Wolfswinkel L, Lindsay TF, Beattie WS. Association between Intraoperative Hypotension and Myocardial Injury after Vascular Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jan;124(1):35-44. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000922. PubMed 26540148 ↗
  • Monk TG, Saini V, Weldon BC, Sigl JC. Anesthetic management and one-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005 Jan;100(1):4-10. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000147519.82841.5E. PubMed 15616043 ↗
  • Walsh M, Devereaux PJ, Garg AX, Kurz A, Turan A, Rodseth RN, Cywinski J, Thabane L, Sessler DI. Relationship between intraoperative mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery: toward an empirical definition of hypotension. Anesthesiology. 2013 Sep;119(3):507-15. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a10e26. PubMed 23835589 ↗
  • Morris RW, Watterson LM, Westhorpe RN, Webb RK. Crisis management during anaesthesia: hypotension. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Jun;14(3):e11. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2002.004440. PubMed 15933284 ↗
  • Reich DL, Hossain S, Krol M, Baez B, Patel P, Bernstein A, Bodian CA. Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2005 Sep;101(3):622-628. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000175214.38450.91. PubMed 16115962 ↗
  • de Mendonca A, Vincent JL, Suter PM, Moreno R, Dearden NM, Antonelli M, Takala J, Sprung C, Cantraine F. Acute renal failure in the ICU: risk factors and outcome evaluated by the SOFA score. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Jul;26(7):915-21. doi: 10.1007/s001340051281. PubMed 10990106 ↗
  • Liu YL, Prowle J, Licari E, Uchino S, Bellomo R. Changes in blood pressure before the development of nosocomial acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Feb;24(2):504-11. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn490. Epub 2008 Sep 3. PubMed 18768582 ↗
  • Lehman LW, Saeed M, Moody G, Mark R. Hypotension as a Risk Factor for Acute Kidney Injury in ICU Patients. Comput Cardiol (2010). 2010;37:1095-1098. PubMed 22158679 ↗
  • Kellum JA, Lameire N; KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1). Crit Care. 2013 Feb 4;17(1):204. doi: 10.1186/cc11454. PubMed 23394211 ↗
  • Mandelbaum T, Scott DJ, Lee J, Mark RG, Malhotra A, Waikar SS, Howell MD, Talmor D. Outcome of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury using the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria. Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2659-64. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182281f1b. PubMed 21765352 ↗
  • Martensson J, Martling CR, Bell M. Novel biomarkers of acute kidney injury and failure: clinical applicability. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Dec;109(6):843-50. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes357. Epub 2012 Oct 9. PubMed 23048068 ↗
  • Chertow GM, Burdick E, Honour M, Bonventre JV, Bates DW. Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 Nov;16(11):3365-70. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004090740. Epub 2005 Sep 21. PubMed 16177006 ↗
  • Kashani K, Al-Khafaji A, Ardiles T, Artigas A, Bagshaw SM, Bell M, Bihorac A, Birkhahn R, Cely CM, Chawla LS, Davison DL, Feldkamp T, Forni LG, Gong MN, Gunnerson KJ, Haase M, Hackett J, Honore PM, Hoste EA, Joannes-Boyau O, Joannidis M, Kim P, Koyner JL, Laskowitz DT, Lissauer ME, Marx G, McCullough PA, Mullaney S, Ostermann M, Rimmele T, Shapiro NI, Shaw AD, Shi J, Sprague AM, Vincent JL, Vinsonneau C, Wagner L, Walker MG, Wilkerson RG, Zacharowski K, Kellum JA. Discovery and validation of cell cycle arrest biomarkers in human acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2013 Feb 6;17(1):R25. doi: 10.1186/cc12503. PubMed 23388612 ↗
  • Vijayan A, Faubel S, Askenazi DJ, Cerda J, Fissell WH, Heung M, Humphreys BD, Koyner JL, Liu KD, Mour G, Nolin TD, Bihorac A; American Society of Nephrology Acute Kidney Injury Advisory Group. Clinical Use of the Urine Biomarker [TIMP-2] x [IGFBP7] for Acute Kidney Injury Risk Assessment. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Jul;68(1):19-28. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.12.033. Epub 2016 Mar 4. PubMed 26948834 ↗
  • Smilowitz NR, Gupta N, Ramakrishna H, Guo Y, Berger JS, Bangalore S. Perioperative Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events Associated With Noncardiac Surgery. JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):181-187. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.4792. PubMed 28030663 ↗
  • Writing Committee for the VISION Study Investigators; Devereaux PJ, Biccard BM, Sigamani A, Xavier D, Chan MTV, Srinathan SK, Walsh M, Abraham V, Pearse R, Wang CY, Sessler DI, Kurz A, Szczeklik W, Berwanger O, Villar JC, Malaga G, Garg AX, Chow CK, Ackland G, Patel A, Borges FK, Belley-Cote EP, Duceppe E, Spence J, Tandon V, Williams C, Sapsford RJ, Polanczyk CA, Tiboni M, Alonso-Coello P, Faruqui A, Heels-Ansdell D, Lamy A, Whitlock R, LeManach Y, Roshanov PS, McGillion M, Kavsak P, McQueen MJ, Thabane L, Rodseth RN, Buse GAL, Bhandari M, Garutti I, Jacka MJ, Schunemann HJ, Cortes OL, Coriat P, Dvirnik N, Botto F, Pettit S, Jaffe AS, Guyatt GH. Association of Postoperative High-Sensitivity Troponin Levels With Myocardial Injury and 30-Day Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery. JAMA. 2017 Apr 25;317(16):1642-1651. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.4360. PubMed 28444280 ↗
  • Salmasi V, Maheshwari K, Yang D, Mascha EJ, Singh A, Sessler DI, Kurz A. Relationship between Intraoperative Hypotension, Defined by Either Reduction from Baseline or Absolute Thresholds, and Acute Kidney and Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):47-65. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001432. PubMed 27792044 ↗
  • Devereaux PJ, Szczeklik W. Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery: diagnosis and management. Eur Heart J. 2020 May 1;41(32):3083-3091. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz301. PubMed 31095334 ↗
  • Gillies MA, Shah AS, Mullenheim J, Tricklebank S, Owen T, Antonelli J, Strachan F, Mills NL, Pearse RM. Perioperative myocardial injury in patients receiving cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy: a substudy of the OPTIMISE Trial. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Aug;115(2):227-33. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev137. Epub 2015 May 21. PubMed 26001837 ↗
  • Scheeren TW, Wiesenack C, Gerlach H, Marx G. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid therapy guided by stroke volume and its variation in high-risk surgical patients: a prospective randomized multicentre study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013 Jun;27(3):225-33. doi: 10.1007/s10877-013-9461-6. Epub 2013 Apr 5. PubMed 23558909 ↗
  • Sun Y, Chai F, Pan C, Romeiser JL, Gan TJ. Effect of perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy on postoperative recovery following major abdominal surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2017 Jun 12;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1728-8. PubMed 28602158 ↗
  • Giglio M, Dalfino L, Puntillo F, Rubino G, Marucci M, Brienza N. Haemodynamic goal-directed therapy in cardiac and vascular surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Nov;15(5):878-87. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs323. Epub 2012 Jul 24. PubMed 22833509 ↗
  • Cecconi M, Fasano N, Langiano N, Divella M, Costa MG, Rhodes A, Della Rocca G. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during elective total hip arthroplasty under regional anaesthesia. Crit Care. 2011;15(3):R132. doi: 10.1186/cc10246. Epub 2011 May 30. PubMed 21624138 ↗
  • Arulkumaran N, Corredor C, Hamilton MA, Ball J, Grounds RM, Rhodes A, Cecconi M. Cardiac complications associated with goal-directed therapy in high-risk surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;112(4):648-59. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet466. Epub 2014 Jan 10. PubMed 24413429 ↗
  • Habicher M, Balzer F, Mezger V, Niclas J, Muller M, Perka C, Kramer M, Sander M. Implementation of goal-directed fluid therapy during hip revision arthroplasty: a matched cohort study. Perioper Med (Lond). 2016 Dec 13;5:31. doi: 10.1186/s13741-016-0056-x. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27999663 ↗
  • Salzwedel C, Puig J, Carstens A, Bein B, Molnar Z, Kiss K, Hussain A, Belda J, Kirov MY, Sakka SG, Reuter DA. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on radial arterial pulse pressure variation and continuous cardiac index trending reduces postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery: a multi-center, prospective, randomized study. Crit Care. 2013 Sep 8;17(5):R191. doi: 10.1186/cc12885. PubMed 24010849 ↗
  • Maheshwari K, Khanna S, Bajracharya GR, Makarova N, Riter Q, Raza S, Cywinski JB, Argalious M, Kurz A, Sessler DI. A Randomized Trial of Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring During Noncardiac Surgery. Anesth Analg. 2018 Aug;127(2):424-431. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003482. PubMed 29916861 ↗
  • Chen G, Chung E, Meng L, Alexander B, Vu T, Rinehart J, Cannesson M. Impact of non invasive and beat-to-beat arterial pressure monitoring on intraoperative hemodynamic management. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012 Apr;26(2):133-40. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9344-2. Epub 2012 Mar 1. PubMed 22382920 ↗
  • Martina JR, Westerhof BE, van Goudoever J, de Beaumont EM, Truijen J, Kim YS, Immink RV, Jobsis DA, Hollmann MW, Lahpor JR, de Mol BA, van Lieshout JJ. Noninvasive continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring with Nexfin(R). Anesthesiology. 2012 May;116(5):1092-103. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31824f94ed. PubMed 22415387 ↗
  • Meidert AS, Nold JS, Hornung R, Paulus AC, Zwissler B, Czerner S. The impact of continuous non-invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure stability during general anaesthesia in orthopaedic patients: A randomised trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Nov;34(11):716-722. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000690. PubMed 28922340 ↗
  • Futier E, Lefrant JY, Guinot PG, Godet T, Lorne E, Cuvillon P, Bertran S, Leone M, Pastene B, Piriou V, Molliex S, Albanese J, Julia JM, Tavernier B, Imhoff E, Bazin JE, Constantin JM, Pereira B, Jaber S; INPRESS Study Group. Effect of Individualized vs Standard Blood Pressure Management Strategies on Postoperative Organ Dysfunction Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1346-1357. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14172. PubMed 28973220 ↗
  • Hatib F, Jian Z, Buddi S, Lee C, Settels J, Sibert K, Rinehart J, Cannesson M. Machine-learning Algorithm to Predict Hypotension Based on High-fidelity Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis. Anesthesiology. 2018 Oct;129(4):663-674. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002300. PubMed 29894315 ↗
  • Davies SJ, Vistisen ST, Jian Z, Hatib F, Scheeren TWL. Ability of an Arterial Waveform Analysis-Derived Hypotension Prediction Index to Predict Future Hypotensive Events in Surgical Patients. Anesth Analg. 2020 Feb;130(2):352-359. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004121. PubMed 30896602 ↗
  • Schneck E, Schulte D, Habig L, Ruhrmann S, Edinger F, Markmann M, Habicher M, Rickert M, Koch C, Sander M. Hypotension Prediction Index based protocolized haemodynamic management reduces the incidence and duration of intraoperative hypotension in primary total hip arthroplasty: a single centre feasibility randomised blinded prospective interventional trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Dec;34(6):1149-1158. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00433-6. Epub 2019 Nov 29. PubMed 31784852 ↗
  • Wijnberge M, Geerts BF, Hol L, Lemmers N, Mulder MP, Berge P, Schenk J, Terwindt LE, Hollmann MW, Vlaar AP, Veelo DP. Effect of a Machine Learning-Derived Early Warning System for Intraoperative Hypotension vs Standard Care on Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension During Elective Noncardiac Surgery: The HYPE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1052-1060. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0592. PubMed 32065827 ↗
  • Hruska K, Ruge T. The Tragically Hip: Trauma in Elderly Patients. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2018 Feb;36(1):219-235. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.014. PubMed 29132579 ↗
  • Shem Tov L, Matot I. Frailty and anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Jun;30(3):409-417. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000456. PubMed 28291129 ↗
  • Brooks SE, Peetz AB. Evidence-Based Care of Geriatric Trauma Patients. Surg Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;97(5):1157-1174. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2017.06.006. PubMed 28958363 ↗
  • Maheshwari K, Shimada T, Yang D, Khanna S, Cywinski JB, Irefin SA, Ayad S, Turan A, Ruetzler K, Qiu Y, Saha P, Mascha EJ, Sessler DI. Hypotension Prediction Index for Prevention of Hypotension during Moderate- to High-risk Noncardiac Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2020 Dec 1;133(6):1214-1222. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003557. PubMed 32960954 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study data can be checked on reasonable request by contact the PI.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06291714
Lead sponsor
University of Giessen
Collaborators
Edwards Lifesciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 4, 2024
Start date
Aug 1, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2025
Completion
Mar 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 3, 2025

Study contacts

Emmanuel Schneck, M.D.
Contact
emmanuel.schneck@chiru.med.uni-giessen.de
0049 641 985 44401
Michael Sander, Prof.
Contact
michael.sander@chiru.med.uni-giessen.de
0049 641 985 44401
Michael Sander, Prof.
principal investigator · Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion