ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06288321Updated Mar 1, 2024

A Study Investigating Whether Low Dose Eyedrops for Pupil Dilation is as Effective and Safe as Standard Dose Eyedrops in Examination for Retinopathy of Prematurity.

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Microdrop Mydrin-P and Standard Mydrin-P in Retinopathy of Prematurity, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Completed at 1 site in Hong Kong. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-01.

Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2022, registered Feb 2024).

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted from August, 2022 to March, 2023 in the neonatal intensive care unit in Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong. The aim of this study was to determine whether microdrops Mydrin-P demonstrates similar efficacy as standard Mydrin -P eyedrops applied to neonates undergoing retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening exams, also to ascertain the optimal time for eye examination after administration of mydriatics and assess whether the cardiovascular, respiratory and gastrointestinal adverse effects differ between microdrops and standard dose Mydrin-P.

Preterm infants were randomized to receive either the standard Mydrin-P eyedrops or the mydriatic microdrops which contained around one-third of the standard Mydrin-P dosage. The primary outcome measured whether a successful ROP examination was conducted. Secondary outcomes included pupil diameters at baselines, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes after eyedrops instillation and at the time of ROP exam as well as adverse effects followed by the mydriatics administration.

A total of 18 patients were enrolled in this study with total 46 episodes of ROP recorded. All episodes with microdrops instillation led to successful ROP exams. There was no statistically significant difference between standard eyedrops and microdrops in determining the success of ROP exam (p=0.233). Mean pupil diameter did not differ between the microdrops and standard eyedrops group. At the time of ROP exam, the mean pupil diameter was 5.47mm in the standard eyedrops group and 5.73mm in the microdrops group. The optimal time for ROP exam was 60 minutes to 120 minutes after first dose of mydriatic. Also there was no difference in the occurrence of systemic side effects when compared to standard Mydrin P drops.

Hence the study concluded that microdrops have similar efficacy and safety profile compared to standard Mydrin-P eyedrops.

02

Conditions studied

  • Retinopathy of Prematurity

Keywords

  • Retinopathy of prematurity
  • Preterm
  • Retinopathy of prematurity screening
  • Microdrops
  • Mydrin P
  • Mydriatics
03

In context

Retinopathy of Prematurity

169 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinopathy of Prematurity; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 82 across 102 interventional studies indexed under Retinopathy of Prematurity.

Browse Retinopathy of Prematurity studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,292 studies on the registry; 348 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Neonates with estimated gestational age (EGA) at birth ≤32 weeks
  • Neonates with birth weight ≤1500g

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neonates with severe clinical condition with unstable vital signs
  • Neonates with congenital anomalies, syndromic disease
  • Neonates with ophthalmological conditions such as eye infections, congenital eye anomalies, trauma
  • Neonates with conditions that are to mydriatic use
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Standard Mydrin-P Group

    Subjects allocated to the Standard Mydrin P group will receive standard Mydrin-P (0.5% tropicamide / 0.5% phenylephrine HCl) which is the standard eyedrops used for dilation of pupil before retinopathy of prematurity examination.

    Drug: Standard Mydrin-P

  • Experimental
    Microdrop group

    Those allocated to the microdrop group will receive microdrop Mydrin-P for pupil dilation before retinopathy of prematurity exam.

    Drug: Microdrop Mydrin-P

Interventions

  • DrugMicrodrop Mydrin-P

    Microdrop Mydrin-P consists of around one third of the standard Mydrin-P drop size. Drop volume measurement was performed using a precision weight scale (Sartorius) with accuracy up to 0.001g. The microdrop administration was conducted via attachment of a 16 gauge needle to a 1ml syringe.

  • DrugStandard Mydrin-P

    Standard Mydrin-P is the standard mydriatic used for retinopathy of prematurity exam as per our local usual practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Successfulness of a ROP exam

    Primary outcome of the study was whether the ROP screening was successfully performed or not without additional eyedrops defined by the ophthalmologist conducting the exam.

    Time frame: From the start of pupil dilation to pupil examination which is around 2 to 3 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pupil diameters

    Pupil diameter (in millimetres, mm) was documented at baseline (before eyedrops are applied, T0), 30 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T30), 60 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T60), 120 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T120) and at time of ROP exam (TROP). Two measurements were taken during each time, one by visual assessment, another one by pupillometer measurement.

    Time frame: From start of pupil dilation (baseline) to 120 minutes after pupil dilation, total time is 120 minutes.

  2. Heart rate

    Heart rate at baseline (before eyedrops are applied, T0), 30 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T30), 60 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T60), 120 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T120) and at time of ROP exam (TROP) were captured.

    Time frame: From start of pupil dilation (baseline) to 120 minutes after pupil dilation, total time is 120 minutes.

  3. Blood pressure

    Blood pressure at baseline (before eyedrops are applied, T0), 30 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T30), 60 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T60), 120 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T120) and at time of ROP exam (TROP) were captured.

    Time frame: From start of pupil dilation (baseline) to 120 minutes after pupil dilation, total time is 120 minutes.

  4. Oxygen saturation

    Oxygen saturation at baseline (before eyedrops are applied, T0), 30 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T30), 60 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T60), 120 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T120) and at time of ROP exam (TROP) were captured.

    Time frame: From start of pupil dilation (baseline) to 120 minutes after pupil dilation, total time is 120 minutes.

  5. Oxygen requirement

    Oxygen requirement at baseline (before eyedrops are applied, T0), 30 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T30), 60 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T60), 120 minutes from first dose of eyedrop (T120) and at time of ROP exam (TROP) were captured.

    Time frame: From start of pupil dilation (baseline) to 120 minutes after pupil dilation, total time is 120 minutes.

  6. Episodes of vomiting

    Episodes of vomiting were documented in the 24 hours after eyedrops administration and compared to the baseline which is the past 24 hours prior to the eyedrops exposure

    Time frame: From start of pupil dilation (baseline) to 24 hours after pupil dilation, total time is 24 hours.

  7. Volume of gastric residuals

    Volume of gastric residuals were documented in the 24 hours after eyedrops administration and compared to the baseline which is the past 24 hours prior to the eyedrops exposure

    Time frame: From start of pupil dilation (baseline) to 24 hours after pupil dilation, total time is 24 hours.

  8. Episodes of apnoea

    Episodes of apnoea were documented in the 24 hours after eyedrops administration and compared to the baseline which is the past 24 hours prior to the eyedrops exposure

    Time frame: From start of pupil dilation (baseline) to 24 hours after pupil dilation, total time is 24 hours.

  9. Episodes of periorbital blanching

    Episodes of periorbital blanching were documented in the 24 hours after eyedrops administration and compared to the baseline which is the past 24 hours prior to the eyedrops exposure

    Time frame: From start of pupil dilation (baseline) to 24 hours after pupil dilation, total time is 24 hours.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2022 to primary completion in Mar 2023, 7 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 18, 2024
First posted
Mar 1, 2024
StartActual
Aug 10, 2022
Primary completionActual
Mar 22, 2023
CompletionActual
Mar 22, 2023
Last update
Mar 1, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 1, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06288321
Responsible party
Lu Evelyn Ruoyun (Doctor, The University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 1, 2024
Start date
Aug 10, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 22, 2023
Completion
Mar 22, 2023
Last update
Mar 1, 2024

Study contacts

Khair Jalal
study chair · Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion