CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06274905Updated Feb 23, 2024

Topical Anaesthesia in Cutaneous Head and Neck Surgery

An interventional study of EMLA and Ethyl chloride in Pain, Acute, Head and Neck Cancer and Cutaneous Tumor, sponsored by University Hospital Waterford. Completed at 1 site in Ireland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-23.

Sponsored by University Hospital Waterford · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2023, registered Jan 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
124
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to assess if EMLA or ethyl chloride spray are effective in reducing the pain associated with local anaesthetic administration in cutaneous surgery of the head and neck compared to a placebo and control group through a randomized control trial study design.

Read the detailed description

Operations on cutaneous tissues of the head and neck are some of the most frequently performed types of operation performed. They can often successfully be performed using local anaesthetic (LA). However, tissues in this anatomic area are some of most sensitive tissues in the body to nociceptive pain. As such, local anaesthetic can be a distressing experience for patients in many ways. Unfortunately, it is also the most common anatomical site for cutaneous malignancies. The majority of these lesions are resected under local anaesthetic. However, one of the major disadvantages of local anaesthetic such as lidocaine is pain during administration.

Several interventions have been used to reduce pain from needles and injections including ethylene chloride cryoanalgesic spray and topical anaesthetic agents including EMLA (lidocaine and prilocaine) and Ametop ointments. These have been extensively used in paediatric populations with great success to reduce pain during procedures requiring hypodermics such as cannulation. Several studies have trialled these interventions in adult populations across a variety of anatomical locations with variable results. The investigators aim to assess the efficacy of EMLA and ethyl chloride in mitigating nociceptive pain associated with local anaesthetic administration in patients undergoing cutaneous head and neck surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Acute
  • Head and Neck Cancer
  • Cutaneous Tumor
03

In context

Head and Neck Neoplasms

2,344 studies on the registry are indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms; 551 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 124 is above the median of 47 across 1,751 interventional studies indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms.

Browse Head and Neck Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Waterford is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged at least 18 years
  • Receiving surgery to cutaneous tissues of the head and neck
  • Procedure performed under local anaesthetic

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Paediatric patients
  • Surgery performed under general anaesthetic
  • Mucosal operative site (e.g. oral cavity)
  • Significant cognitive impairment (e.g. severe dementia)
  • Known sensitivity/allergy to EMLA
  • History of a pain disorder (e.g. complex regional pain syndrome).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
124 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    EMLA cream

    EMLA cream 5% 25g lidocaine, 25g prilocaine; Astra Zeneca. Topically applied followed by Tegaderm dressing to cover. Length of duration monitored and recorded as part of study

    Drug: EMLA

  • Placebo comparator
    EMLA placebo

    Aqueous cream ((Ultrapure Laboratories®️, Mayo, Ireland) applied topically followed by covering with Tegaderm dressing. Length of duration monitored and recorded as part of study

    Drug: Aqueous cream BP

  • Experimental
    Ethyl chloride spray

    Ethyl chloride spray (Cryogesic®, Fannin Ltd, Dublin, Ireland). Applied topically to surgical site prior to LA injection. Spray at distance of 5-10cm for 4-8 seconds until skin slightly blanched and the fluid allowed to evaporate.

    Drug: Ethyl chloride

  • No intervention
    Control group

    No intervention administered

Interventions

  • DrugEMLA

    EMLA cream

  • DrugEthyl chloride

    Ethyl chloride

  • DrugAqueous cream BP

    Aqueous cream

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain score

    The primary outcome measure is patient reported pain on a numeric rating scale (NRS)(1; no pain, 10; worst pain imaginable) recorded after LA administration

    Time frame: The pain score is measured essentially immediately after administration of the local anaesthetic (within 20 seconds of administration).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction measured on NRS scale of 1=not bad at all, to 10=worst experience imaginable recorded immediately postoperatively

    Time frame: The overall patient satisfaction score is measured essentially immediately after the operation had concluded (within 20 seconds of completion).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Waterford
    Waterford, X91 ER8E, Ireland
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 20, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 23, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06274905
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Waterford
Responsible party
Rory O'Neill (Principal Investigator, University Hospital Waterford) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 23, 2024
Start date
Feb 20, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 7, 2023
Completion
Jul 7, 2023
Last update
Feb 23, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion