ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06262854BIG D-FOOTUpdated Feb 16, 2024

Efficacy and Safety of Stimulan® for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis. The BIG D-FOOT Study

An interventional study of Calcium-sulphate granules with tobramicina+vancomicina in Diabete Mellitus, Foot Ulcer and Osteomyelitis - Foot, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-16.

Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2025, 1 year 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed as a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel series randomized trial aimed at verifying the effiicacy and safety of a local calcium-sulphate bio-absorbable antibiotic delivery (tobramicina+vancomicina) versus placebo (calcium-sulphate matrix without antibiotics) in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis treated with surgical procedures.

Read the detailed description

Osteomyelitis is a severe complication of diabetic foot ulcers, that can occur in nearly 20-60% of patients. Current treatments for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) include surgical procedures aimed at removing necrotic soft tissue, gengrene and infected bones and systemic antibiotic therapy for at least 4-6 weeks; however in some cases, prolonged antibiotic therapy is not unusual.

Antibiotic therapy can be problematic for several reasons, such as the achievement of appropriate and stable therapeutic concentration at bone level, particularly due to the common presence of concomitant peripheral artery disease, and kidney impairment. In recent years, another important barrier to the treatment of DFO was the increasing incidence of resistant pathogens. On the other hand, surgical options are affected by several side effects, such as alterations of foot biomechanics possibly leading to new ulcers (the so called transfer ulcer), post-surgical infections, ecc. All these factors make the DFO treatment challenging, with a high risk of all-cause mortality and rate of patients requiring major amputations Local bio-absorbable antibiotic delivery can be a valid therapeutic option for DFO treatment. During the last 2 decades, biodegradable carriers have been developed: proteins (collagen, gelatin, thrombin etc.), synthetic polymers, grafts, and substitutes (calcium sulfate or phosphate).

Local antibiotic delivery system has been widely explored to increase the duration of local antibiotic delivery and bone penetration, achieving very high local therapeutical doses (about several times higher than that obtained with systemic antibiotic therapy) with reduced systemic toxicity. Another important advantage of this device is the possibility of using very effective, but highly toxic, antibiotic such as aminoglycosides, often not taken into account for systemic therapies.

Finally, this device can be used as a bone substitute filling the dead space caused by bone resection, thus reducing the incidence of reinfection. Complications of calcium sulfate are negligible and include postoperative drainage and transient hypercalcemia.

There several observational studies and very few randomized trials performed on DFO exploring the efficacy of local bio-absorbable antibiotic delivery and none on Stimulan.

The present study is designed as a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel series randomized trial aimed at verifying the effiicacy and safety of a local calcium-sulphate bio-absorbable antibiotic delivery (either with tobramicina or vancomicina) versus placebo (calcium-sulphate matrix without antibiotics) in patients with DFO treated with surgical procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabete Mellitus
  • Foot Ulcer
  • Osteomyelitis - Foot
  • Surgical Procedure, Unspecified

Keywords

  • diabetes;
  • foot osteomyelitis;
  • ulcer;
  • calcium sulphate local antibiotic delivery;
  • Stimulan
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

8,290 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,077 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 80 across 6,023 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi is the lead sponsor of 77 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Type 1 or 2 diabetes
  • Forefoot osteomyelitis
  • Deep tissue infection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • \< 30 ml/min
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Calcium-sulphate granules with tobramicina+vancomicina

    Device: Calcium-sulphate granules with tobramicina+vancomicina

  • Sham comparator
    Calcium-sulphate granules without antibioitcs

    Device: Calcium-sulphate granules with tobramicina+vancomicina

Interventions

  • DeviceCalcium-sulphate granules with tobramicina+vancomicina

    Local calcium-sulphate antibiotics deliver for the treatment of diabetic foot osteomyelitis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The composite primary endpoint of this study will be the incidence osteomyelitis recurrence or new osteomyelitis in adjacent sites or tissue infection at the site of osteomyelitis.

    Post-surgical infective complications

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of healed patients

    Complete rehepitelization of the ulcer

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Proportion of osteomyelitis recurrence

    Recurrence of osteomyelitis in the same foot site

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Proportion of post-surgical tissue infection

    Tissue infection at the surgical wound level

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Proportion of wound recurrence

    New ulcer at the same site

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Proportion of patients undergoing major amputation

    Above ankle amputation

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Proportion of patients undergoing new surgical intervention

    New surgical intervention for osteomyelitis

    Time frame: 3 months

  7. Ulcer time-to-healing

    From baseline to healing (days)

    Time frame: 3 months

  8. Osteomyelitis time-to-recurrence

    From baseline to osteomyelitis recurrence (days)

    Time frame: 3 months

  9. Any serious adverse events

    Life-threatening adverse events

    Time frame: 3 months

  10. Any non serious adverse events

    Mild-moderate adverse events

    Time frame: 3 months

  11. Proportion of post-surgical dehiscence

    Post-surgical infection

    Time frame: 7 days

  12. Direct medical costs

    Costs for foot-related problems (hospital admission, amputation, revascularization, antibiotic therapy, medical device, etc.)

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06262854
Lead sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
Responsible party
Matteo Monami (MD, PhD, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 16, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 16, 2024

Study contacts

Matteo Monami, PhD
Contact
matteo.monami@unifi.it
00393384027484
Benedetta Ragghianti, MD
Contact
b.ragghianti@gmail.com
0039055794332

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion