ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06258915FOCUSUpdated Feb 14, 2024

Treatment FOr Corticosteroid Dependent UveitiS

A Phase 3 interventional study of Adalimumab and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Non Infectious Uveitis, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-14.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

FOCUS is the first prospective randomized study comparing standard of care (mycophenolate mofetil) to adalimumab in recently active non infectious uveitis (NIU) with steroid dependency. There is no firm evidence or randomized trials that compared classical immunosuppressive compounds to biological agents; or identified the best treatment in this condition. The burden of NIU has been reduced with the use of immunosuppressive agents and biologics, raising the question of which of these compounds should be preferentially used in recently active NIU with steroid dependency.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non Infectious Uveitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Non-infectious uveitis
  • Macular oedema
  • Retinal vascularitis
  • Adalimumab
  • Mycophenolate mofetil
03

In context

Macular Edema

756 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Edema; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 56 across 584 interventional studies indexed under Macular Edema.

Browse Macular Edema studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Provide written, prior to the performance of any study-specific procedures
  2. ≥18 years of age
  3. Diagnosis of non-infectious intermediate, posterior-, or pan-uveitis in at least one eye fulfilling the International Study Group Classification Criteria (Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature [SUN] criteria) of posterior, or pan- uveitis confirmed by documented medical history
  4. Recent activity of Non Infectious Uveitis as defined by the presence of at least 1 of the following parameters in either eye within the 3 months prior to inclusion visit despite >7mg/day of oral prednisone:

    • Active chorioretinal or retinal vascular lesion
    • Presence of macular edema by optical coherence.
    • ≥ 2+ anterior chamber cells (Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature [SUN] criteria)
    • ≥ 2+ vitreous haze (National Eye Institute [NEI]/SUN criteria)
  5. Chest X-ray (postero-anterior and lateral) or CT-scanner results within 12 weeks prior to inclusion with no evidence of active Tuberculosis, active infection, or
  6. A potential subject with a positive interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) (e.g., QuantiFERON®-TB Gold or T-spot TB® Test) at inclusion is eligible if:

    1. Her/his chest X-ray does not show evidence suggestive of active tuberculosis disease
    2. And there are no clinical signs and symptoms of pulmonary and/or extra-pulmonary tuberculosis disease.
    3. And these subjects with a latent tuberculosis infection who have not already received a prophylactic tuberculosis treatment must agree in advance to complete such a treatment course.
  7. For female subjects of : a negative pregnancy test at inclusion
  8. For subjects with , a willingness to use measures adequate to prevent the subject or the subject's partner from becoming pregnant during the study and 3 months and 5 months after stopping therapy for Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and adalimumab, respectively, unless sterility is confirmed. The simultaneous use of two complementary methods of contraception is preferable. Methods which may be considered as highly effective methods that can achieve a failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly are considered as highly effective birth control methods (according to Clinical Trial Falicitation Group (CTFG) recommendations). Such methods include:

    For Female subjects :

    1. combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation 1:

      • oral
      • intravaginal
      • transdermal
    2. progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation:

      • oral
      • injectable
      • implantable
    3. intrauterine device (IUD)
    4. intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)
    5. bilateral tubal occlusion
    6. vasectomised partner
    7. sexual abstinence (In the context of this guidance sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective method only if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study treatments. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject).

    For male subjects :

    1. use of condoms
    2. vasectomy (with documentation of azoospermia)
    3. sexual abstinence
  9. Affiliated to a social security system

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Infectious uveitis, masquerade syndromes (idiopathic uveitis is permitted)
  2. Isolated anterior uveitis
  3. Monocular patient
  4. Active tuberculosis
  5. Positive serology or Virus (HCV) Virus (HBV) Ag test
  6. History of within 5 years prior to Inclusion other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix, non- squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
  7. History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to monoclonal antibodies, mycophenolate mofetil, rifampicin, isoniazid or fluorescein
  8. Infection requiring treatment with intravenous antibiotics within 3 weeks prior to inclusion
  9. History of multiple sclerosis and/or demyelinating disorder
  10. Laboratory values assessed during inclusion:

    • \< 8g/dL
    • Whole Blood Count (WBC) \< 2.0 x 103/mm3
    • count \< 80 x 103/mm3
    • (GFR) \<30ml/min.
    • Transaminases > 3 times upper normal value
  11. Use of the following systemic treatments during the specified periods:

    • Treatment with any systemic alkylating agents within 12 months prior to inclusion (e.g., cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil)
    • Any live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks prior to inclusion.
  12. Stage III and IV (NYHA) cardiac insufficiency
  13. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  14. Under legal protection
  15. Participation in another interventional study involving human participants or in the exclusion period
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(13)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Adalimumab

    Drug: Adalimumab

  • Active comparator
    Mycophenolate mofetil

    Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment failure rate

    Treatment failure is defined by any of the following in at least one eye: * new active, inflammatory chorioretinal or retinal vascular lesions; * worsening of Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by\>3 lines; Score from 20/10 (best vision) to 20/2400 (worst vision). * 2- step increase in anterior chamber cell grade and/or in vitreous haze relative to baseline. Anterior chamber cells scored from 0 (None) to 4+ (intense: fibrin or plastic aquerous) and Vitreous haze Scored from 0 (\<1 cell in field) to +4 (\>100 cells in field) * absence of steroid discontinuation between week 13 and week 19 (as per protocol) * or any additional immunosuppressive drug or injectable steroids

    Time frame: At week 36

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to treatment failure

    Time frame: Up to week 55

  2. Best corrected visual acuity

    Snellen score in each eye. Score from 20/10 (best vision) to 20/2400 (worst vision).

    Time frame: At week 4

  3. Best corrected visual acuity

    Snellen score in each eye. Score from 20/10 (best vision) to 20/2400 (worst vision).

    Time frame: At week 8

  4. Best corrected visual acuity

    Snellen score in each eye. Score from 20/10 (best vision) to 20/2400 (worst vision).

    Time frame: At week 12

  5. Best corrected visual acuity

    Snellen score in each eye. Score from 20/10 (best vision) to 20/2400 (worst vision).

    Time frame: At week 16

  6. Best corrected visual acuity

    Snellen score in each eye. Score from 20/10 (best vision) to 20/2400 (worst vision).

    Time frame: At week 20

  7. Best corrected visual acuity

    Snellen score in each eye. Score from 20/10 (best vision) to 20/2400 (worst vision).

    Time frame: At week 24

  8. Best corrected visual acuity

    Snellen score in each eye. Score from 20/10 (best vision) to 20/2400 (worst vision).

    Time frame: At week 30

  9. Best corrected visual acuity

    Snellen score in each eye. Score from 20/10 (best vision) to 20/2400 (worst vision).

    Time frame: At week 36

  10. Best corrected visual acuity

    Snellen score in each eye. Score from 20/10 (best vision) to 20/2400 (worst vision).

    Time frame: At week 55

  11. Anterior chamber cell grade in each eye

    Score from 0 (None) to 4+ (intense: fibrin or plastic aqueous).

    Time frame: At week 4

  12. Anterior chamber cell grade in each eye

    Score from 0 (None) to 4+ (intense: fibrin or plastic aqueous).

    Time frame: At week 8

  13. Anterior chamber cell grade in each eye

    Score from 0 (None) to 4+ (intense: fibrin or plastic aqueous).

    Time frame: At week 12

  14. Anterior chamber cell grade in each eye

    Score from 0 (None) to 4+ (intense: fibrin or plastic aqueous).

    Time frame: At week 16

  15. Anterior chamber cell grade in each eye

    Score from 0 (None) to 4+ (intense: fibrin or plastic aqueous).

    Time frame: At week 20

  16. Anterior chamber cell grade in each eye

    Score from 0 (None) to 4+ (intense: fibrin or plastic aqueous).

    Time frame: At week 24

  17. Anterior chamber cell grade in each eye

    Score from 0 (None) to 4+ (intense: fibrin or plastic aqueous).

    Time frame: At week 30

  18. Anterior chamber cell grade in each eye

    Score from 0 (None) to 4+ (intense: fibrin or plastic aqueous).

    Time frame: At week 36

  19. Anterior chamber cell grade in each eye

    Score from 0 (None) to 4+ (intense: fibrin or plastic aqueous).

    Time frame: At week 55

  20. Vitreous haze grade in each eye.

    Nussenblatt score, Score from 0 (\<1 cell in field) to +4 (\>100 cells in field)

    Time frame: At week 4

  21. Vitreous haze grade in each eye.

    Nussenblatt score, Score from 0 (\<1 cell in field) to +4 (\>100 cells in field)

    Time frame: At week 8

  22. Vitreous haze grade in each eye.

    Nussenblatt score, Score from 0 (\<1 cell in field) to +4 (\>100 cells in field)

    Time frame: At week 12

  23. Vitreous haze grade in each eye.

    Nussenblatt score, Score from 0 (\<1 cell in field) to +4 (\>100 cells in field)

    Time frame: At week 16

  24. Vitreous haze grade in each eye.

    Nussenblatt score, Score from 0 (\<1 cell in field) to +4 (\>100 cells in field)

    Time frame: At week 20

  25. Vitreous haze grade in each eye.

    Nussenblatt score, Score from 0 (\<1 cell in field) to +4 (\>100 cells in field)

    Time frame: At week 24

  26. Vitreous haze grade in each eye.

    Nussenblatt score, Score from 0 (\<1 cell in field) to +4 (\>100 cells in field)

    Time frame: At week 30

  27. Vitreous haze grade in each eye.

    Nussenblatt score, Score from 0 (\<1 cell in field) to +4 (\>100 cells in field)

    Time frame: At week 36

  28. Vitreous haze grade in each eye.

    Nussenblatt score, Score from 0 (\<1 cell in field) to +4 (\>100 cells in field)

    Time frame: At week 55

  29. Central retinal thickness in each eye from baseline

    Time frame: At week 4

  30. Central retinal thickness in each eye from baseline

    Time frame: At week 8

  31. Central retinal thickness in each eye from baseline

    Time frame: At week 12

  32. Central retinal thickness in each eye from baseline

    Time frame: At week 16

  33. Central retinal thickness in each eye from baseline

    Time frame: At week 20

  34. Central retinal thickness in each eye from baseline

    Time frame: At week 24

  35. Central retinal thickness in each eye from baseline

    Time frame: At week 30

  36. Central retinal thickness in each eye from baseline

    Time frame: At week 36

  37. Central retinal thickness in each eye from baseline

    Time frame: At week 55

  38. Proportion of patients with central macular thickness< 300 microns

    Time frame: At week 4

  39. Proportion of patients with central macular thickness< 300 microns

    Time frame: At week 8

  40. Proportion of patients with central macular thickness< 300 microns

    Time frame: At week 12

  41. Proportion of patients with central macular thickness< 300 microns

    Time frame: At week 16

  42. Proportion of patients with central macular thickness< 300 microns

    Time frame: At week 20

  43. Proportion of patients with central macular thickness< 300 microns

    Time frame: At week 24

  44. Proportion of patients with central macular thickness< 300 microns

    Time frame: At week 30

  45. Proportion of patients with central macular thickness< 300 microns

    Time frame: At week 36

  46. Proportion of patients with central macular thickness< 300 microns

    Time frame: At week 55

  47. Time to optical coherence tomographic (OCT) evidence of macular edema in at least one eye

    Time frame: Up to week 55

  48. National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionaire-25 (VFQ-25) composite score

    Note after responses converted: 100=Best, 0=Worst possible score

    Time frame: At week 12

  49. National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionaire-25 (VFQ-25) composite score

    Note after responses converted: 100=Best, 0=Worst possible score

    Time frame: At week 24

  50. National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionaire-25 (VFQ-25) composite score

    Note after responses converted: 100=Best, 0=Worst possible score

    Time frame: At week 36

  51. Measures of corticosteroid sparing

    Percent meeting targets \[\<0.1 mg/kg/day prednisone\], mean change, mean dose at week 55, and cumulative dose

    Time frame: Up to week 55

  52. Cumulative incidence of relapse

    Time frame: Up to week 55

  53. Number of relapses

    Time frame: Up to week 55

  54. Number of clinical manifestations of underlying disease

    Depending on the underlying disease

    Time frame: Up to week 55

  55. Frequency and severity of adverse events

    Time frame: Up to week 55

  56. Treatment discontinuation

    Time frame: Up to week 55

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Mar 2024; primary completion for Jun 2027, 39 months later.

Of 65 phase 3 interventional studies under Macular Edema, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 38. This study's planned 39 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 23, 2024
First posted
Feb 14, 2024
StartEst.
Mar 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Nov 1, 2027
Last update
Feb 14, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 14, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06258915
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 14, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 14, 2024

Study contacts

Bahram BODAGHI, Pr
Contact
bahram.bodaghi@aphp.fr
+33142163728
Jérôme Lambert, Pr
Contact
jerome.lambert@u-paris.fr
+33142499742

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Adalimumab

Start the discussion