ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06253806SGBUpdated Nov 10, 2025Results posted

Stellate Ganglion Block for COVID-induced Parosmia

A Phase 2 interventional study of Stellate Ganglion Block and Placebo Sham Injection in COVID-19-Induced Parosmia, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-10.

Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2023, registered Feb 2024).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic olfactory dysfunction, both hyposmia and parosmia, from the COVID-19 pandemic is a growing public health crisis with up to 1.2 million people in the United States affected. Olfactory dysfunction impacts one's quality of life significantly by decreasing the enjoyment of foods, creating environmental safety concerns, and affecting one's ability to perform certain jobs. Olfactory loss is also an independent predictor of anxiety, depression, and even mortality. Recent research by our group (unpublished data) and suggests that parosmias, moreso than hyposmias, can result in increased rates of anxiety, depression, and even suicidal ideation. While the pandemic has increased the interest by the scientific community in combating the burgeoning health crisis, few effective treatments currently exist for olfactory dysfunction. Persistent symptoms after an acute COVID-19 infection, or "Long COVID" symptoms, have been hypothesized to be a result of sympathetic positive feedback loops and dysautonomia. Stellate ganglion blocks have been proposed to treat this hyper-sympathetic activation by blocking the sympathetic neuronal firing and resetting the balance of the autonomic nervous system. Studies prior to the COVID-19 pandemic have supported a beneficial effect of stellate ganglion blocks on olfactory dysfunction, and recent news reports and a published case series have described a dramatic benefit in both olfactory function and other long COVID symptoms in patients receiving stellate ganglion blocks. A previous pilot study using stellate ganglion blocks of 20 participants with persistent COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction resulted modest improvements in subjective olfactory function, smell identification, and olfactory-specific quality-of-life, but it lacked a control group. Therefore, we propose a double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy of a stellate ganglion block versus saline injection in a total of up to 140 participants with persistent COVID-19-associated olfactory dysfunction.

Read the detailed description

One of the hallmark symptoms of infection with SARS-CoV-2 is olfactory dysfunction (OD). While the majority of patients recover from COVID dysosmia, up to 15%-25% have long-term hyposmia and it is estimated that up to 1.2 million people in the United States will experience chronic OD from the COVID-19 pandemic. A unique feature of COVID-19-associated OD is the high rate of persistent parosmia. In one study of 222 patients with COVID-19-associated olfactory dysfunction by Lerner et al, 148 (67%) of these patients experienced parosmia at some point, and estimates of persistent parosmia 6 months after COVID-19 infection range from 25% to 57%.Patients with OD have decreased quality-of-life and have described their lives as if "living in a box." These patients have concerns for environmental safety, decreased enjoyment of their food, depression, anxiety, and even a higher risk of mortality. Unpublished work by our group has demonstrated a relationship between parosmia and increased risk of screening positive for anxiety, depression, and suicidality.

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of the sense of olfaction, but no standard of care treatment for post-viral OD exists. The most commonly used treatment for post-viral OD is olfactory training; however, a large proportion of patients do not receive benefit and continue to have persistent symptoms. A multitude of other therapies have been tried in randomized clinical trials with minimal success, including theophylline, vitamin A, sodium citrate, and intranasal insulin. As a result, there is a critical need for the development of a novel intervention to address the large number of patients with OD due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The stellate ganglion block (SGB) is proposed to inhibit the sympathetic neural connections within the head, neck, and upper extremity, improve regional blood flow, reduce adrenal hormone concentration, and even reestablish circadian rhythms through modulation of melatonin. The SGB has been used successfully in a multitude of disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder, migraine, and complex regional pain syndrome. A meta-analysis of 12 clinical trials found that SGB was superior to placebo in reducing pain scores among patients with various sympathetic hyperactivity-associated disorders. Many "long COVID" symptoms, those that persist after recovery from acute COVID-19 infection, are hypothesized to be, at least in part, a result of sympathetic hyperactivity resulting in positive feedback loops. Therefore, the stellate ganglion block (SGB) is hypothesized to reset the balance of the autonomic nervous system and provide relief for long COVID symptoms, including OD.

The SGB was first proposed to treat OD by Lee et al in 2003, where 38 post-viral OD participants were treated with SGB and 13 participants remained untreated as controls. Subjective olfactory function improved in 27 (71%) of the treated participants compared to zero (0%) of the controls. Olfactory perception was improved significantly in the SGB group assessed both by the butanol threshold test and odor identification test. Additional studies by Moon et al noted improvement in OD of various etiologies after repeated SGBs. However, each of these studies were limited by their use of unvalidated outcome measures in a heterogeneous OD population in the pre-COVID era, limiting their external validity to the present day.

A multitude of anecdotal news reports and published case series point to a possible beneficial effect of the SGB on both chronic COVID-19-induced OD and various other long COVID symptoms. Numerous pain management clinics across the country are offering the SGB for long COVID with thousands of dollars of out-of-pocket costs to patients without adequate evidence to justify its use. One case series of 195 parosmic patients noted up to a 75% response rate after SGB.

Recently, our study team completed a prospective, pilot single-arm trial of 20 participants with persistent COVID-19-associated OD who underwent bilateral stellate ganglion blocks and were followed for 1 month post-procedure. At 1-month, 10 (50%) participants experienced at least slight subjective improvement in their OD, 11 (55%) attained a clinically meaningful improvement in smell identification using the UPSIT, and 7 (35%) achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in olfactory-specific QOL. Therefore, we propose a double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy of a stellate ganglion block versus saline injection in a total of 140 participants with persistent COVID-19-associated parosmia.

02

Conditions studied

  • COVID-19-Induced Parosmia

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Long-COVID
  • Anosmia
  • Olfaction Disorders
  • Pneumonia, Viral
  • Pneumonia
  • Respiratory Tract Infections
  • Infections
  • Virus Diseases
  • Coronavirus Infections
  • Coronaviridae infections
  • Nidovirales Infections
  • RNA Virus Infections
  • Lung Diseases
  • Respiratory Tract Diseases
  • Sensation Disorders
  • Neurologic Manifestations
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Mepivacaine
  • Anesthetics, local
  • Anesthetics
  • Central Nervous System Depressants
  • Physiological Effects of Drugs
  • Sensory System Agents
  • Peripheral Nervous System Agents
  • Stellate Ganglion Block
03

In context

COVID-19

7,990 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 466 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is below the median of 102 across 4,364 interventional studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,803 studies on the registry; 271 are open to participants now.

Of its 329 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 216 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults age 18 to 70
  2. Diagnosis of COVID at least 6 months prior to study enrollment with self-reported parosmia
  3. Ability to read, write, and understand English
  4. Score of at least 40 on DiSODOR during screening and at least 25 during Visit 1

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of smell loss or change prior to COVID-19 infection
  2. History of conditions known to impact olfactory dysfunction

    1. Chronic rhinosinusitis
    2. History of prior sinonasal or skull base surgery
    3. Neurodegenerative disorders (Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia)
  3. Currently using concomitant therapies specifically for the treatment of olfactory dysfunction
  4. Inability to tolerate a needle injection into the neck
  5. History of coexisting conditions that make SGB :

    1. Unilateral vocal cord paralysis
    2. Severe ( between 30-50% of predicted)
    3. Recent myocardial infarction within the last year
    4. Glaucoma
    5. Cardiac conduction block of any degree
  6. Currently taking blood thinners or antiplatelet agents, including aspirin >81mg.
  7. Allergy to local anesthetic
  8. Inability to extend the neck for any reason (e.g., severe arthritis)
  9. History of prior stellate ganglion block
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Experimental: Stellate Ganglion Block

    The ultrasound guided stellate ganglion blocks will be performed at the initial visit by a board-certified anesthesiologist and pain management specialist with extensive experience performing these blocks. Laterality of the stellate ganglion blocks will be randomized between the left and right sides of the neck.

    Drug: Stellate Ganglion Block

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo: Sham Injection

    The ultrasound guided placebo sham injections will be performed at the initial visit by a board-certified anesthesiologist and pain management specialist with extensive experience performing these injections. Laterality of the placebo sham injections will be randomized between the left and right sides of the neck.

    Drug: Placebo Sham Injection

Interventions

  • The stellate ganglion will be identified using ultrasound guidance, and after negative aspiration, 6-8 mL of 1% mepivacaine will be injected near the stellate ganglion.

    Also known as: mepivacaine

  • DrugPlacebo Sham Injection

    The stellate ganglion will be identified using ultrasound guidance, and after negative aspiration, 6-8 mL of 0.9% saline will be injected near the stellate ganglion.

    Also known as: 0.9% saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Parosmia Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating

    The primary outcome of the study is to determine the efficacy of a stellate ganglion block (SGB) in improving parosmia-related quality of life compared to a saline injection placebo. The instrument contains 28 total items with each scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (no difficulty) to 4 (complete difficulty or very frequent bother). Higher total scores indicate a greater degree of dysfunction and limitation. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for DisODOR being 15 points.

    Time frame: 1-mo outcome and 3-mo outcome

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S) Smell Loss

    The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) for smell loss (parosmia) is used to measure the overall response to treatment by assessing changes in the clinical condition compared to before the stellate ganglion block. It uses a 7-point Likert scale with the following response options: (1) Much better now than before, (2) Moderately better now than before, (3) Slightly better now than before, (4) About the same, (5) Slightly worse now than before, (6) Moderately worse now than before, and (7) Much worse now than before. Participants who report "slightly better now than before" or greater improvement are classified as responders.

    Time frame: 1-mo and 3-mo

  2. Long-COVID Questionnaire

    At each follow-up visit, participants are asked to rank their overall improvement in each of the 11 symptoms compared to their symptoms prior to their first SGB. The improvement options are based on the CGI-I 7-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 0-77, with higher scores being worse and lower scores being better.

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months

  3. Olfaction Catastrophizing Scale (OCS)

    Participants will be asked to complete the OCS, which measures the negative mental response to smell dysfunction loss. Multiple thoughts/feelings will be assessed on a 5-point Likert scale with a maximum score of 52. Participants will complete the OCS at each study visit to assess the degree of olfactory-related catastrophizing over time.

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months

  4. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Participants will be asked to complete the HADS, which screens for both anxiety and depression in the general population. It consists of 7 questions for anxiety and 7 questions for depression each ranked on a 4-point Likert Scale. A score of 0-7 is considered normal, 8-10 is borderline abnormal anxiety or depression, and a score of 11-21 corresponds with screening positive for anxiety or depression.

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months

  5. Patient Satisfaction With Treatment

    Participants will be asked at 1 month "Overall, how satisfied were you with the stellate ganglion block treatment for your parosmia?" with possible answer choices: 1) Completely dissatisfied, 2) Mostly dissatisfied, 3) Somewhat dissatisfied, 4) Neither satisfied or dissatisfied, 5) Somewhat satisfied, 6) Mostly satisfied, 7) Completely satisfied.

    Time frame: 1 mo, 3-mo

  6. Assessment of the Blind

    Immediately after the injection, participants will be asked "Which intervention do you think you received?" with answer choices of 1) Mepivacaine (active medication) or 2) Saline (placebo). It is performed immediately after the initial injection during the first visit, just prior to discharge.

    Time frame: during first visit

Other outcomes

  1. Adverse Events Assessment

    Any potential adverse events of the stellate ganglion block will be collected from participants.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months

07

Results

Posted Nov 10, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Limitations include lack of objective assessment for parosmia, which remains poorly defined in the literature.

Participant flow

48 participants were enrolled and randomized, with 32 receiving SGB and 16 receiving placebo.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneExperimental: Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo: Sham Injection
Started3216
1-mo outcome3116
3-mo outcome3016
Completed3016
Not completed20

Outcome measures

PrimaryParosmia Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating

The primary outcome of the study is to determine the efficacy of a stellate ganglion block (SGB) in improving parosmia-related quality of life compared to a saline injection placebo. The instrument contains 28 total items with each scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (no difficulty) to 4 (complete difficulty or very frequent bother). Higher total scores indicate a greater degree of dysfunction and limitation. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for DisODOR being 15 points.

Time frame:
1-mo outcome and 3-mo outcome
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale 0-112
Parosmia Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating
score on a scale 0-112Experimental: Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo: Sham Injection
1-mo9 (-19 to 54)9 (-13 to 82)
3-mo14 (-21 to 59)11 (-16 to 60)
SecondaryClinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S) Smell Loss

The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) for smell loss (parosmia) is used to measure the overall response to treatment by assessing changes in the clinical condition compared to before the stellate ganglion block. It uses a 7-point Likert scale with the following response options: (1) Much better now than before, (2) Moderately better now than before, (3) Slightly better now than before, (4) About the same, (5) Slightly worse now than before, (6) Moderately worse now than before, and (7) Much worse now than before. Participants who report "slightly better now than before" or greater improvement are classified as responders.

Time frame:
1-mo and 3-mo
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S) Smell Loss
ParticipantsExperimental: Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo: Sham Injection
1-mo — slightly to much better84
1-mo — about the same2211
1-mo — slightly to much worse11
3-mo — slightly to much better136
3-mo — about the same1310
3-mo — slightly to much worse40
SecondaryLong-COVID Questionnaire

At each follow-up visit, participants are asked to rank their overall improvement in each of the 11 symptoms compared to their symptoms prior to their first SGB. The improvement options are based on the CGI-I 7-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 0-77, with higher scores being worse and lower scores being better.

Time frame:
1 month, 3 months
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale 0-77
Long-COVID Questionnaire
score on a scale 0-77Experimental: Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo: Sham Injection
1-mo44 (21 to 68)45 (11 to 69)
3-mo44 (16 to 74)44 (11 to 53)
SecondaryOlfaction Catastrophizing Scale (OCS)

Participants will be asked to complete the OCS, which measures the negative mental response to smell dysfunction loss. Multiple thoughts/feelings will be assessed on a 5-point Likert scale with a maximum score of 52. Participants will complete the OCS at each study visit to assess the degree of olfactory-related catastrophizing over time.

Time frame:
1 month, 3 months
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Olfaction Catastrophizing Scale (OCS)
units on a scaleExperimental: Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo: Sham Injection
1-mo8 (-6 to 32)6 (-5 to 38)
3-mo7 (-13 to 31)5 (-8 to 33)
SecondaryHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

Participants will be asked to complete the HADS, which screens for both anxiety and depression in the general population. It consists of 7 questions for anxiety and 7 questions for depression each ranked on a 4-point Likert Scale. A score of 0-7 is considered normal, 8-10 is borderline abnormal anxiety or depression, and a score of 11-21 corresponds with screening positive for anxiety or depression.

Time frame:
1 month, 3 months
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
units on a scaleExperimental: Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo: Sham Injection
1-mo HADS anxiety1 (-6 to 10)1 (-5 to 10)
3-mo HADS anxiety1 (-8 to 18)1 (-8 to 8)
1-mo HADS depression1 (-7 to 10)1 (-4 to 8)
3-mo HADS depression8 (-6 to 32)3 (-7 to 7)
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction With Treatment

Participants will be asked at 1 month "Overall, how satisfied were you with the stellate ganglion block treatment for your parosmia?" with possible answer choices: 1) Completely dissatisfied, 2) Mostly dissatisfied, 3) Somewhat dissatisfied, 4) Neither satisfied or dissatisfied, 5) Somewhat satisfied, 6) Mostly satisfied, 7) Completely satisfied.

Time frame:
1 mo, 3-mo
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient Satisfaction With Treatment
ParticipantsExperimental: Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo: Sham Injection
1-mo — Somewhat to completely satisfied85
1-mo — Neither satisfied or dissatisfied104
1-mo — Somewhat to completely dissatisfied137
3-mo — Somewhat to completely satisfied115
3-mo — Neither satisfied or dissatisfied15
3-mo — Somewhat to completely dissatisfied186
SecondaryAssessment of the Blind

Immediately after the injection, participants will be asked "Which intervention do you think you received?" with answer choices of 1) Mepivacaine (active medication) or 2) Saline (placebo). It is performed immediately after the initial injection during the first visit, just prior to discharge.

Time frame:
during first visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Assessment of the Blind
ParticipantsExperimental: Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo: Sham Injection
1-mo blind assessment1814
3-mo blind assessment124
Other pre-specifiedAdverse Events Assessment

Any potential adverse events of the stellate ganglion block will be collected from participants.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events will be recorded from the time of dose administration (the stellate ganglion block or placebo injection) through the post-dose period and up to the final follow-up visit at approximately 3 months after the injection. The study team will monitor and document all adverse events throughout this entire timeframe.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Experimental: Stellate Ganglion Block0/31 (0%)0/31 (0%)25/31 (80.6%)
Placebo: Sham Injection0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)2/16 (12.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventExperimental: Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo: Sham Injection
transient voice hoarsenessGeneral disorders9/310/16
nasal congestionGeneral disorders6/310/16
headache or migraineGeneral disorders5/311/16
lightheadedness or dizzinessGeneral disorders5/311/16

Baseline characteristics

Of 48 randomized participants,32 were randomized to SGB and 16 to placebo arm.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo Sham InjectionsTotal
Median45 (19 to 64)55 (26 to 64)46 (19 to 64)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo Sham InjectionsTotal
Female261339
Male639
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo Sham InjectionsTotal
Hispanic or Latino314
Not Hispanic or Latino291544
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo Sham InjectionsTotal
Race — Black123
Race — White311445
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo Sham InjectionsTotal
United States321648
The Parosmia Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (DisODOR)
The Parosmia Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (DisODOR)(scores ranging 0-116)Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo Sham InjectionsTotal
Median63 (33 to 97)66 (26 to 95)66 (26 to 97)
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S) smell loss
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S) smell loss(Participants)Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo Sham InjectionsTotal
No loss112
Very mild to mild loss6511
Moderate to severe loss251035
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S) smell distortion
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S) smell distortion(Participants)Stellate Ganglion BlockPlacebo Sham InjectionsTotal
No distortion325
very mild to mild distortion112
Moderate to severe distortion281341

6 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Nyssa Fox Farrell
    St Louis, Missouri 63122, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hintschich CA, Fischer R, Hummel T, Wenzel JJ, Bohr C, Vielsmeier V. Persisting olfactory dysfunction in post-COVID-19 is associated with gustatory impairment: Results from chemosensitive testing eight months after the acute infection. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 23;17(3):e0265686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265686. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35320821 ↗
  • Fortunato F, Martinelli D, Iannelli G, Milazzo M, Farina U, Di Matteo G, De Nittis R, Ascatigno L, Cassano M, Lopalco PL, Prato R. Self-reported olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions in COVID-19 patients: a 1-year follow-up study in Foggia district, Italy. BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 22;22(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07052-8. PubMed 35065619 ↗
  • Khan AM, Kallogjeri D, Piccirillo JF. Growing Public Health Concern of COVID-19 Chronic Olfactory Dysfunction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Jan 1;148(1):81-82. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.3379. PubMed 34792577 ↗
  • Lerner DK, Garvey KL, Arrighi-Allisan AE, Filimonov A, Filip P, Shah J, Tweel B, Del Signore A, Schaberg M, Colley P, Govindaraj S, Iloreta AM. Clinical Features of Parosmia Associated With COVID-19 Infection. Laryngoscope. 2022 Mar;132(3):633-639. doi: 10.1002/lary.29982. Epub 2021 Dec 13. PubMed 34870334 ↗
  • Schambeck SE, Crowell CS, Wagner KI, D'Ippolito E, Burrell T, Mijocevic H, Protzer U, Busch DH, Gerhard M, Poppert H, Beyer H. Phantosmia, Parosmia, and Dysgeusia Are Prolonged and Late-Onset Symptoms of COVID-19. J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 12;10(22):5266. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225266. PubMed 34830550 ↗
  • Hopkins C, Surda P, Vaira LA, Lechien JR, Safarian M, Saussez S, Kumar N. Six month follow-up of self-reported loss of smell during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rhinology. 2021 Feb 1;59(1):26-31. doi: 10.4193/Rhin20.544. PubMed 33320115 ↗
  • Keller A, Malaspina D. Hidden consequences of olfactory dysfunction: a patient report series. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2013 Jul 23;13(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6815-13-8. PubMed 23875929 ↗
  • Santos DV, Reiter ER, DiNardo LJ, Costanzo RM. Hazardous events associated with impaired olfactory function. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Mar;130(3):317-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.3.317. PubMed 15023839 ↗
  • Pang NY, Song HJJMD, Tan BKJ, Tan JX, Chen ASR, See A, Xu S, Charn TC, Teo NWY. Association of Olfactory Impairment With All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 May 1;148(5):436-445. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.0263. PubMed 35389456 ↗
  • Addison AB, Wong B, Ahmed T, Macchi A, Konstantinidis I, Huart C, Frasnelli J, Fjaeldstad AW, Ramakrishnan VR, Rombaux P, Whitcroft KL, Holbrook EH, Poletti SC, Hsieh JW, Landis BN, Boardman J, Welge-Lussen A, Maru D, Hummel T, Philpott CM. Clinical Olfactory Working Group consensus statement on the treatment of postinfectious olfactory dysfunction. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 May;147(5):1704-1719. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.12.641. Epub 2021 Jan 13. PubMed 33453291 ↗
  • Lee JJ, Peterson AM, Kallogjeri D, Jiramongkolchai P, Kukuljan S, Schneider JS, Klatt-Cromwell CN, Drescher AJ, Brunworth JD, Piccirillo JF. Smell Changes and Efficacy of Nasal Theophylline (SCENT) irrigation: A randomized controlled trial for treatment of post-viral olfactory dysfunction. Am J Otolaryngol. 2022 Mar-Apr;43(2):103299. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103299. Epub 2021 Dec 3. PubMed 34894449 ↗
  • Reden J, Lill K, Zahnert T, Haehner A, Hummel T. Olfactory function in patients with postinfectious and posttraumatic smell disorders before and after treatment with vitamin A: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):1906-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.23405. Epub 2012 Jul 2. PubMed 22752966 ↗
  • Whitcroft KL, Gunder N, Cuevas M, Andrews P, Menzel S, Haehner A, Hummel T. Intranasal sodium citrate in quantitative and qualitative olfactory dysfunction: results from a prospective, controlled trial of prolonged use in 60 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Aug;278(8):2891-2897. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06567-7. Epub 2021 Jan 20. PubMed 33471169 ↗
  • Patel ZM, Holbrook EH, Turner JH, Adappa ND, Albers MW, Altundag A, Appenzeller S, Costanzo RM, Croy I, Davis GE, Dehgani-Mobaraki P, Doty RL, Duffy VB, Goldstein BJ, Gudis DA, Haehner A, Higgins TS, Hopkins C, Huart C, Hummel T, Jitaroon K, Kern RC, Khanwalkar AR, Kobayashi M, Kondo K, Lane AP, Lechner M, Leopold DA, Levy JM, Marmura MJ, Mclelland L, Miwa T, Moberg PJ, Mueller CA, Nigwekar SU, O'Brien EK, Paunescu TG, Pellegrino R, Philpott C, Pinto JM, Reiter ER, Roalf DR, Rowan NR, Schlosser RJ, Schwob J, Seiden AM, Smith TL, Soler ZM, Sowerby L, Tan BK, Thamboo A, Wrobel B, Yan CH. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Apr;12(4):327-680. doi: 10.1002/alr.22929. PubMed 35373533 ↗
  • Rezaeian A. Effect of Intranasal Insulin on Olfactory Recovery in Patients with Hyposmia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jun;158(6):1134-1139. doi: 10.1177/0194599818764624. Epub 2018 Mar 20. PubMed 29557250 ↗
  • Kang CK, Oh ST, Chung RK, Lee H, Park CA, Kim YB, Yoo JH, Kim DY, Cho ZH. Effect of stellate ganglion block on the cerebrovascular system: magnetic resonance angiography study. Anesthesiology. 2010 Oct;113(4):936-44. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ec63f5. PubMed 20823762 ↗
  • Treggiari MM, Romand JA, Martin JB, Reverdin A, Rufenacht DA, de Tribolet N. Cervical sympathetic block to reverse delayed ischemic neurological deficits after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2003 Apr;34(4):961-7. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000060893.72098.80. Epub 2003 Mar 20. PubMed 12649526 ↗
  • Mulvaney SW, McLean B, de Leeuw J. The use of stellate ganglion block in the treatment of panic/anxiety symptoms with combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder; preliminary results of long-term follow-up: a case series. Pain Pract. 2010 Jul-Aug;10(4):359-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00373.x. Epub 2010 Apr 20. PubMed 20412504 ↗
  • Lipov EG, Joshi JR, Sanders S, Slavin KV. A unifying theory linking the prolonged efficacy of the stellate ganglion block for the treatment of chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS), hot flashes, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Med Hypotheses. 2009 Jun;72(6):657-61. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.01.009. Epub 2009 Feb 23. PubMed 19237252 ↗
  • Rae Olmsted KL, Bartoszek M, Mulvaney S, McLean B, Turabi A, Young R, Kim E, Vandermaas-Peeler R, Morgan JK, Constantinescu O, Kane S, Nguyen C, Hirsch S, Munoz B, Wallace D, Croxford J, Lynch JH, White R, Walters BB. Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block Treatment on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 1;77(2):130-138. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3474. PubMed 31693083 ↗
  • Hou J, Pu S, Xu X, Lu Z, Wu J. Real-time ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block for migraine: an observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Mar 24;22(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01622-8. PubMed 35331152 ↗
  • Yucel I, Demiraran Y, Ozturan K, Degirmenci E. Complex regional pain syndrome type I: efficacy of stellate ganglion blockade. J Orthop Traumatol. 2009 Dec;10(4):179-83. doi: 10.1007/s10195-009-0071-5. Epub 2009 Nov 4. PubMed 19888550 ↗
  • Liao CD, Tsauo JY, Liou TH, Chen HC, Rau CL. Efficacy of Noninvasive Stellate Ganglion Blockade Performed Using Physical Agent Modalities in Patients with Sympathetic Hyperactivity-Associated Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 2;11(12):e0167476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167476. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27911934 ↗
  • Fischer L, Barop H, Ludin SM, Schaible HG. Regulation of acute reflectory hyperinflammation in viral and other diseases by means of stellate ganglion block. A conceptual view with a focus on Covid-19. Auton Neurosci. 2022 Jan;237:102903. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102903. Epub 2021 Nov 10. PubMed 34894589 ↗
  • Lee NS, Yoon HR, Park JW, Yum JH, Seo JH, Cho JH, et al. The efficacy of stellate ganglion block in olfactory disorder following upper respiratory tract infection. Korean J Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2003;46:568-571.
  • Moon HS, Lee HJ, Sung CH, Lim SJ, Choi JH. The efficacy of stellate ganglion block in sensorineural anosmia patients unresponsive to steroid therapy. Korean J Pain. 2007;20:154-157
  • Moon HS, Chon JY, Lee SH, Ju YM, Sung CH. Long-term Results of Stellate Ganglion Block in Patients with Olfactory Dysfunction. Korean J Pain. 2013 Jan;26(1):57-61. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2013.26.1.57. Epub 2013 Jan 4. PubMed 23342209 ↗
  • Chauhan G, Upadhyay A, Khanduja S, Emerick T. Stellate Ganglion Block for Anosmia and Dysgeusia Due to Long COVID. Cureus. 2022 Aug 8;14(8):e27779. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27779. eCollection 2022 Aug. PubMed 36106285 ↗
  • Liu LD, Duricka DL. Stellate ganglion block reduces symptoms of Long COVID: A case series. J Neuroimmunol. 2022 Jan 15;362:577784. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577784. Epub 2021 Dec 8. PubMed 34922127 ↗
  • Khan MH, Kirkpatrick KP, Deng Y, Shah KB. Stellate Ganglion Block for Long COVID Symptom Management: A Case Report. Cureus. 2022 Dec 7;14(12):e32295. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32295. eCollection 2022 Dec. PubMed 36628048 ↗
  • Galvin V, Cheek DJ, Zhang Y, Collins G, Gaskin D. Short Communication: Stellate Ganglion Blockade for Persistent Olfactory and Gustatory Symptoms Post-COVID-19. Local Reg Anesth. 2023 May 3;16:25-30. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S402197. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37162813 ↗
  • Dunlop BW, Gray J, Rapaport MH. Transdiagnostic Clinical Global Impression Scoring for Routine Clinical Settings. Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Jun 27;7(3):40. doi: 10.3390/bs7030040. PubMed 28653978 ↗
  • Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M. Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav. 1984 Mar;32(3):489-502. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90269-5. PubMed 6463130 ↗
  • Doty RL. Office procedures for quantitative assessment of olfactory function. Am J Rhinol. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):460-73. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3043. PubMed 17882917 ↗
  • Hughes SE, Haroon S, Subramanian A, McMullan C, Aiyegbusi OL, Turner GM, Jackson L, Davies EH, Frost C, McNamara G, Price G, Matthews K, Camaradou J, Ormerod J, Walker A, Calvert MJ. Development and validation of the symptom burden questionnaire for long covid (SBQ-LC): Rasch analysis. BMJ. 2022 Apr 27;377:e070230. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070230. PubMed 35477524 ↗
  • McLean B. Safety and Patient Acceptability of Stellate Ganglion Blockade as a Treatment Adjunct for Combat-Related Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Quality Assurance Initiative. Cureus. 2015 Sep 10;7(9):e320. doi: 10.7759/cureus.320. PubMed 26487996 ↗
  • Farrell NF, Crock LW, Islam A, Adkins D, Peterson AM, Kallogjeri D, Piccirillo JF. Stellate Ganglion Block for the Treatment of COVID-19-Induced Parosmia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Aug 1;151(8):741-749. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.1304. PubMed 40504522 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2023 to primary completion in Sep 2024, 10 months.

Results were first posted in Nov 2025, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

Of 359 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under COVID-19, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 18. This study's 10 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 582 studies reached it within 9 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 16.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 9, 2024
First posted
Feb 12, 2024
StartActual
Oct 25, 2023
Primary completionActual
Sep 16, 2024
CompletionActual
Sep 16, 2024
Results first posted
Nov 10, 2025
Last update
Nov 10, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06253806
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 12, 2024
Start date
Oct 25, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 16, 2024
Completion
Sep 16, 2024
Results posted
Nov 10, 2025
Last update
Nov 10, 2025

Study contacts

Nyssa Farrell, MD
principal investigator · Washington University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Mepivacaine

Start the discussion