CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06225102Updated Jan 25, 2024

The Effect of Kegel Exercise in Nursing Students With Primary Dysmenorrhoea

An interventional study of Kegel Exercise in Primary Dysmenorrhea, sponsored by Gümüşhane Universıty. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-25.

Sponsored by Gümüşhane Universıty · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2021, registered Jan 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
89
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

In this study, it was aimed to determine the effect of kegel exercise on menstruation symptoms, severity of dysmenorrheic symptoms and quality of life in nursing students with primary dysmenorrhea. The study was conducted as a single-blind randomized controlled trial.

Read the detailed description

The study was conducted in a single-blind randomized controlled trial with 89 nursing students with primary dysmenorrhea. The experimental group was given kegel exercise training online, and after the training, a message was sent to remind them to do kegel exercises three times a day during the follow-up. No intervention was made in the control group.

Hypotheses of the Research

  1. VAS total scores in interventions involving kegel exercise training and regular kegel exercise are lower than control interval rates (H1).
  2. The total score of the Menstruation Symptom Scale within the participants who participated in kegel exercise training and regular kegel exercise was recorded, at lower rates than the distribution of control intervals (H1).
  3. The Severity of Dysmenorrheic Symptoms in participants who participated in kegel exercise training and regular kegel exercise interventions were lower than the distribution of control intervals (H1).
  4. The total scores of the Quality of Life Scale among those who participated in kegel exercise training and regular kegel exercises were higher than the proportions of the controlled rankings (H1).
02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Dysmenorrhea

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • PRIMARY DYSMENORHEA
  • Kegel exercise
  • Nursing students
  • Exercise
03

In context

Dysmenorrhea

398 studies on the registry are indexed under Dysmenorrhea; 96 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 89 is above the median of 60 across 333 interventional studies indexed under Dysmenorrhea.

Browse Dysmenorrhea studies →

Lead sponsor

Gümüşhane Universıty is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • be between the ages of 18-25
  • Giving 6 points or more to the least menstruation pain on the day that individuals experience the most severe dysmenorrhea symptoms (VAS) out of 10 points on the VAS Visual Pain Scale
  • Being Nulliparous (never giving birth)
  • Regular menstruation for the last six months
  • Not having any gynecological diagnosis
  • Not having had a gynecological operation
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being a man
  • Being married
  • Being diagnosed with secondary dysmenorrhea
  • Giving menstruation pain less than 6 points out of 10 on the VAS Visual Pain Scale.
  • Taking painkillers 12 hours before the assessments.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
89 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    experimental group

    The intervention group was first given training on the definition of kegel exercises, diagnostic criteria, treatment, benefits and how to do kegel exercises on the Zoom platform. A second meeting was held for the participants of the initiative group who could not attend this training. At the same time, a message was sent to the WhatsApp application group where the intervention group was located three times a day by the researchers to remind them to do kegel exercises in the morning, noon and evening.

    Behavioral: Kegel Exercise

  • No intervention
    control group

    No intervention was made in the control group

Interventions

  • BehavioralKegel Exercise

    * Before teaching Kegel exercises, it was recommended that the person empty his bladder and wear comfortable clothing. * It was said that the person should extend his legs straight while exercising and not to contract his leg, hip and abdominal muscles and not to hold his breath while the pelvic floor muscles contract. * The relevant muscles were told to contract for 10 seconds and then relax for 10 seconds. The person was also asked to do the exercises during daily activities. * Exercise was implemented regularly 3 times a day (minimum 30-45 exercises) in the morning, noon and evening.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Personal Information Form

    It was prepared in line with the literature. The form consists of a total of 25 questions, including information about socio-demographic information, pain during menstrual period, vaginal discharge characteristics, and practices regarding menstrual quantity.

    Time frame: one week

  2. Visual Analogue Scale

    It was used to evaluate the pain intensity of individuals during their menstrual period. Individuals were asked to mark their pain level on a 10-centimeter (cm) horizontal line, meaning "0 (no pain)" and "10 (most severe pain)." Individuals responded by thinking about the pain they experienced during the first 3 days of their first, second, and third menstrual cycles.

    Time frame: one week

  3. The Menstrual Symptom Scale

    The scale consists of 22 items and is a five-point Likert type. Items 1-13 belong to "Negative effects/somatic complaints" sub-dimension, items 14-19 belong to "Menstrual pain symptoms" sub-dimension and items 20-22 belong to "Coping methods" sub-dimension. The Menstrual Symptom Scale score is calculated by averaging the total score of the items in the scale. Participants are asked to assign a number between 1 (never) and 5 (always) to the symptoms they experience related to menstruation. An increase in the mean score indicates an increase in the severity of menstrual symptoms. The scale has three sub-dimensions. The score obtained from the sub-dimensions is calculated by averaging the total score of the items in the sub-dimensions. An increase in the mean score for the sub-dimensions indicates an increase in the severity of menstrual symptoms related to that sub-dimension. Cronbach's Alpha value of the scale is 0.86

    Time frame: Three months

  4. The Severity of Dysmenorrheic Symptoms

    The presence and magnitude of dysmenorrhoeic symptoms were assessed using this Likert-type scale (none = 0; mild = 1; moderate = 2; and severe = 3). The dimensions assessed by the scale are: Colicky pain in the lower abdomen, bloating, irritability, depression pain or tenderness in the breasts, back pain, gastrointestinal disorders headache, leg oedema

    Time frame: Three months

  5. The Quality of Life Scale

    Item-total score correlations were calculated between 0.47-0.88. It is not possible to obtain a total score for the Short Form-36 quality of life scale. Instead, summary scores can be obtained for the physical and mental components of health in the Short Form-36 scale. Physical health components are physical function, physical role, pain and general health perception subscales, while mental health components are vitality, social function, emotional role and mental health subscales. In the summary scores, the lowest score is "0" and the highest score is "100" and a high score indicates good health status.

    Time frame: Three months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Gümüşhane University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing
    Gümüşhane, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06225102
Lead sponsor
Gümüşhane Universıty
Responsible party
Özge PALANCI AY (RESEARCH ASSISTANT, Gümüşhane Universıty) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 25, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2021
Completion
Jul 31, 2021
Last update
Jan 25, 2024

Study contacts

RUVEYDE AYDIN
principal investigator · Ondokuz Mayıs University
ÖZGE PALANCI AY
principal investigator · Gümüşhane Universıty
SONGÜL AKTAŞ
principal investigator · Karadeniz Technical University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion