ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06220370PATHUpdated Feb 20, 2024

PATH Study: People With Injecting Related Infections: Assessing Treatment Outcomes for Those Who Are Hospitalised.

An observational study in Invasive Fungal Infections, Invasive Bacterial Infection and Injection Site Infection, sponsored by Kirby Institute. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-20.

Sponsored by Kirby Institute · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

We seek to characterise the burden and outcomes of and understand the current experience of people who inject drugs admitted to hospital with invasive injecting-related infections, in order to implement and evaluate strategies to improve completion of therapy and reduce patient-directed discharges, with ultimate benefit to the patient and health service.

Read the detailed description

This study will be conducted as a prospective, observational cohort study of adults admitted with invasive bacterial and fungal infectious diseases. This study will be conducted at multiple hospitals in Australia.

Participants will be invited for Screening whilst they are inpatients of the hospital. Participants will be screened for history of injection drug use in the last 6 months and presence of an invasive bacterial or fungal infection.

Eligible participants will be treated through standard of care with the applicable treatment. All participants will commence antimicrobial treatment whilst they are inpatients. For participants who are discharged before planned treatment completion, a hospital discharge visit (Early Discharge Electronic Case Report Form [eCRF]) will be conducted. Following the end of treatment, participants will be reviewed at 6, 12 and 48-weeks post-enrolment. At follow-up visits, behavioural surveys, health-related quality of life, and experiences with hospital care will be assessed.

Individual patient involvement will include four visits over a 12-month period.

The duration of the study is anticipated to be 5 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Invasive Fungal Infections
  • Invasive Bacterial Infection
  • Injection Site Infection
  • Infection, Bacterial
  • Infection, Fungal
  • Infection, Soft Tissue

Keywords

  • Antimicrobial therapy
  • Patient-directed discharge
  • Injection-related infectious diseases
03

In context

Invasive Fungal Infections

136 studies on the registry are indexed under Invasive Fungal Infections; 33 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 125 across 66 observational studies indexed under Invasive Fungal Infections.

Browse Invasive Fungal Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Kirby Institute is the lead sponsor of 94 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study will be conducted as a prospective, observational cohort study of adults admitted with invasive bacterial and fungal infectious diseases. This study will be conducted at multiple hospitals in Australia.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Have voluntarily signed the form,
  2. 18 years of age or older,
  3. Injected drugs within the last 6 months,
  4. Admitted to hospital with invasive bacterial or fungal infection, a. Examples of invasive infection include: bloodstream infection, bone and joint infection (osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, discitis), central nervous system infection (epidural abscess, meningitis), deep abscess (i.e., brain, liver, muscle, spleen), endovascular infection (infective endocarditis, septic thrombophlebitis, mycotic aneurysm, septic embolism), skin or soft tissue infection (necrotising fasciitis, myositis),

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Is unable or unwilling to provide or abide by the requirements of the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherObservational

    There is no clinical intervention as part of this study. Participants will receive treatment as per their clinical treating team.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. primary outcome

    To evaluate the proportion electing for, and factors associated with, patient-directed discharge among PWID admitted for management of invasive IRID.

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Mar 2024; primary completion for Mar 2029, 60 months later.

Of 30 observational studies under Invasive Fungal Infections, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 60 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 14, 2024
First posted
Jan 23, 2024
StartEst.
Mar 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Mar 1, 2029
CompletionEst.
Mar 1, 2029
Last update
Feb 20, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06220370
Lead sponsor
Kirby Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 23, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 20, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion