ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03855917STRIVE-4Updated Jul 29, 2026

Strategic Treatment Reduction in Very Early Liver Disease With 4 Weeks Sofosbuvir Plus Glecepravir-pibrentasvir

A Phase 4 interventional study of Sofosbuvir 400mg [Sovaldi] and Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (300mg/120mg) in Hepatitis C, sponsored by Kirby Institute. Recruiting at 3 sites in Australia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by Kirby Institute · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2020; still recruiting 6 years 9 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and feasibility of four weeks of sofosbuvir plus glecaprevir-pibrentasvir, followed by immediate retreatment of virological relapse with glecepravir-pibrentasvir for 12 weeks, in treatment-naïve participants with chronic HCV infection and early liver disease (F0-F2).

Read the detailed description

The capacity to eliminate HCV through rapid direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy scale-up would be enhanced by shortened duration therapy in key populations. The "next generation" DAA regimen of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (300mg/120mg), an NS3/4a protease inhibitor and NS5A inhibitor, provides key features for potential simplified shortened duration therapy in people with early liver disease (F0-2), including pangenotypic activity, high efficacy, and favourable on-treatment HCV RNA kinetics. The addition of sofosbuvir (400 mg) may provide further feasibility for shortened duration therapy with a potent triple class DAA regimen.

Shortened duration therapy (4-6 weeks) has been evaluated in chronic HCV populations with several DAA regimens, with generally unfavourable outcomes (SVR\<50%) for 4 week durations.8-11 In a study among a predominantly African American population of 4 week duration therapy of 3 or 4 DAAs, with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir/GS-9451 (protease inhibitor) and sofosbuvir/ledipasvir/GS-9451/GS-9669 (non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor), SVR was only 40% (10/25) and 20% (5/25) in the 3 and 4 DAA regimen groups, respectively.10 In separate phase II studies that included evaluation of 6 weeks sofosbuvir (400mg)/velpatasvir (100mg)/voxilaprevir (100 mg) in treatment naïve patients without cirrhosis, SVR was 88% (29/33) among patients with genotype 2, 3, 4, or 6,12 93% (14/15) in patients with genotype 13,13 and and 71% (24/34) in patients with genotype 1.14 Non-published data (provided by Gilead Sciences) from the latter study demonstrates a higher SVR (88%, 14/16) in the sub-population of patients with F0-2. Thus, in patients with relatively early liver disease virological failure is uncommon with 6-week duration sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir therapy.

These studies would suggest that a 6-week duration therapy, particularly with a potent 3 DAA triple class regimen, may be feasible for many patients with chronic HCV infection, but a 4-week duration would probably compromise treatment outcomes. However, in a small study (n=16) among younger people who inject drugs (PWID) with early liver disease (\<50 years, F0-2) in Denmark, a 4-week regimen of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir plus ribavirin provided a per protocol (PP)(n=13) SVR of 92% (one relapse) with intention to treat (ITT) SVR of 75%. In the same study 16 PWID were treated with the same regimen plus pegylated interferon with PP and ITT SVR of 100% and 94%, respectively. Further evidence for the potential of ultra-short duration DAA therapy comes from a response-guided study in Hong Kong. Patients with HCV genotype 1b were treated with three different triple class DAA regimens, including sofosbuvir/ledipasvir + asunaprevir, sofosbuvir + daclatasvir + simeprevir, or sofosbuvir + daclatasvir + asunaprevir, and those with an ultra-rapid virological response (HCV RNA \<500 IU/mL at day 2; 18/26) had treatment duration shortened to three weeks. The SVR rate was 100% (18/18) in the three-week treated population.

While efficacy has been suboptimal in most studies of short duration DAA therapy to date, the emergence of clinically significant resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) has not been seen, and retreatment with the same regimen for 12 weeks has been successful.8,9 The FOURward study examined the safety and efficacy of short-duration therapy (4 or 6 weeks) with sofosbuvir + daclatasvir/asunaprevir/beclabuvir in patients with HCV genotype 1 and without cirrhosis.9 Although efficacy was suboptimal (SVR12 43%), among those with virological relapse (n=16), 44% (n=7) had no emergent RAS detected at failure. Furthermore, in the nine patients with treatment-emergent NS5A RAS, the clinical significance was uncertain, as all emergent NS5A RAS conferred low-nanomolar resistance in vitro. Regardless of RAS emergence, retreatment of patients who experienced virological relapse with 12 weeks sofosbuvir + daclatasvir/asunaprevir/beclabuvir + ribavirin resulted in SVR of 100%. C-SWIFT evaluated the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir + elbasvir/grazoprevir in patients with HCV genotype 1 and without cirrhosis for four and six weeks, with SVR12 rates of 32% (10/31) and 87% (26/30), respectively.8 All patients with virological relapse who received retreatment with 12 weeks of sofosbuvir + elbasvir/grazoprevir + ribavirin achieved SVR12, despite the majority having NS5A and/or NS3 RAS.

The combination of sofosbuvir (400 mg) + glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (300mg/120mg) has not been evaluated as a shortened duration triple class DAA regimen. It has been evaluated as a 12 and 16-week regimen in combination with ribavirin for treatment of prior glecaprevir-pibrentasvir virological failure (8 or 12-week duration prior therapy), with very high efficacy of 96% (22/23) and good tolerability (Wyles D. et al. ILC 2018). A non-ribavirin containing regimen would be expected to have further enhanced tolerability.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatitis C

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hepatitis C

1,743 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis C; 97 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 72 across 1,223 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis C.

Browse Hepatitis C studies →

Lead sponsor

Kirby Institute is the lead sponsor of 94 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- Participants must meet all inclusion criteria to be eligible to participate in this study:

  1. Have voluntarily signed the form.
  2. 18 years of age or older.
  3. Chronic infection as defined by anti-HCV antibody or HCV RNA detection for greater than 6 months.
  4. Quantifiable HCV RNA at screening.
  5. HCV treatment naïve (no prior treatment with an approved or investigation anti-HCV medication).
  6. Liver fibrosis stage F0-F2, defined by at least one of the following:

    1. Liver stiffness measurement \<9.5 kPa by transient elastography (FibroScan®)
    2. to ratio index (APRI) \<0.5
    3. Liver
  7. If co-infection with is documented, the subject must meet the following criteria:

    • ART naïve with >500 cells/mm3; OR
    • On a stable ART regimen (containing only permissible ART - see protocol section 6.3) for >8 weeks prior to screening visit, with CD4 T cell count >200 cells/mm3 and a plasma HIV RNA level below the limit of detection.
  8. Negative pregnancy test at screening and baseline (females of only).
  9. All fertile females must be using effective during treatment and during the 30 days after treatment end.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who meet any of the exclusion criteria are not to be enrolled in this study.

    1. History of any of the following:

      1. illness (other than ) or any other major medical disorder that may interfere with the participant treatment, assessment or compliance with the protocol; participants currently under evaluation for a potentially clinically significant illness (other than HCV) are also excluded.
      2. Clinical hepatic decompensation (i.e. ascites, encephalopathy or variceal haemorrhage).
      3. Solid organ transplant.
      4. History of severe, life-threatening or other significant sensitivity to any of the study drugs.
    2. Any of the following lab parameters at screening:

      1. > 10 x
      2. AST > 10 x ULN
      3. Direct > ULN
      4. \< 150,000/μL (cells/mm3)
      5. (CLcr) \< 50 mL/min
      6. Albumin \< LLN
      7. > 1.5 ULN
    3. Pregnant or breastfeeding female.
    4. infection (HBsAg positive).
    5. Use of prohibited concomitant medications as described in protocol section 6.3.
    6. Chronic use of systemically administered agents (e.g. prednisone equivalent > 10 mg/day for >2 weeks).
    7. Therapy with any anti-neoplastic or immunomodulatory treatment (including supraphysiologic doses of and radiation) ≤6 months prior to the first dose of study drug.
    8. Any drug ≤6 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug.
    9. Ongoing severe psychiatric disease as judged by the treating physician.
    10. Inability or unwillingness to provide or abide by the requirements of the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(19)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

CD4 count

The number of CD4 cells, a type of white blood cell, in a given amount of blood. It is used to follow how well the immune system is doing in HIV.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sof plus G/P

    Four weeks of sofosbuvir (400mg) plus glecaprevir-pibrentasvir (300mg/120mg) will be administered, followed by immediate retreatment of virological relapse with glecepravir/pibrentasvir (300mg/120mg) for 12 weeks, in treatment-naïve participants with chronic HCV infection and early liver disease (F0-F2).

    Drug: Sofosbuvir 400mg [Sovaldi] · Drug: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (300mg/120mg)

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. SVR12

    To evaluate the proportion achieving a sustained virological response at 12 weeks post treatment (SVR12) with sofosbuvir (400 mg) plus glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (300mg/120mg) for four weeks.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Virological relapse

    To evaluate virological relapse following 4 weeks sofosbuvir (400 mg) plus glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (300mg/120mg) in HCV treatment-naïve chronic HCV patients with early liver disease (F0-2).

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  2. Relapse characteristics

    In patients with virological relapse, to evaluate the time course of relapse and emergence of treatment-associated resistance substitutions.

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  3. Re-treatment SVR

    To evaluate SVR following re-treatment of virological relapse with 12 weeks glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (300mg/120mg).

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  4. Adherence

    To evaluate the proportion adherent to treatment and study visits.

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  5. Cost-effectiveness

    To evaluate cost-effectiveness of a shortened duration with re-treatment of relapse strategy, against a standard duration (8-week, historical data).

    Time frame: 32 weeks

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Protocol and SAP will be submitted along with the primary manuscript for publication.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2029, 113 months after the start.

Of 56 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Hepatitis C, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 49. This study's planned 113 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 58 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 25, 2019
First posted
Feb 27, 2019
StartActual
Feb 11, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Jul 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2029
Last update
Jul 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03855917
Lead sponsor
Kirby Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 27, 2019
Start date
Feb 11, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Study contacts

Marianne Martinello, MD, PhD
Contact
mmartinello@kirby.unsw.edu.au
+61293850900
Pip Marks, MPH Hons
Contact
pmarks@kirby.unsw.edu.au
+61293850900
Marianne Martinello, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Kirby Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir

Start the discussion