An interventional study of Educational Intervention (Video) and Survey Administration in Cancer, sponsored by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-23.
Sponsored by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
Under-representation of patients from racial/ethnic minority groups in cancer clinical trials is a major barrier to health equity. Black patients are significantly less likely to be enrolled in clinical trials compared with non-Hispanic White (White) patients although they carry a disproportionate burden of cancer mortality, the shortest survival rates, and are more likely to be diagnosed at later stages. Further, medical mistrust and lack of awareness and complexity of clinical trials are barriers that reduce the likelihood of clinical trial participation. The objective of this pilot study is to understand the effect of a culturally tailored decision aid (previously developed by our research team) on 1) medical mistrust, 2) patient knowledge about clinical trials, and 3) decision-making self-efficacy and determine the acceptability of the decision aid among Black patients currently or ever been diagnosed with cancer.
This study will be conducted online through Qualtrics.
Participants will answer pre-test survey questions, watch the culturally tailored decision aid video [Fostering Opportunities in Research Using Marketing Strategies (FOR US)] intervention, then answer post-intervention survey questions.
9,610 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,508 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 109 is above the median of 50 across 7,429 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.
Browse Neoplasms studies →Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 546 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.
Of its 59 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 46 (78%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants watch a culturally tailored decision aid video. Surveys are completed before and after the video.
Other: Educational Intervention (Video) · Other: Survey Administration
Watch video
Also known as: Fostering Opportunities in Research Using Marketing Strategies (FOR US)
Answer survey questions
Change in Medical Mistrust from Baseline to Post-Intervention: 12-item Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale
Will assess the effect of a culturally tailored decision aid video on medical mistrust. Participants will complete the 12-item Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale at baseline and post-intervention. This is a 12-item validated survey focused on healthcare provided in the social context of racism and discrimination. Item responses use a Likert-type scale with higher scores indicating higher agreement.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)
Change in Trust in Health Information from Baseline to Post-Intervention: Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)
Will assess the effect of a culturally tailored decision aid video on trust in information. Participants will complete 6 items from the National Cancer Institute - Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). HINTS collects nationally representative data routinely about the American public's use of cancer-related information. HINTS comprises multiple choice questions about medical research and medical records and patient-provider communications.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)
Change in Patient Knowledge from Baseline to Post-Intervention: Five unique question items
Will assess the effect of a culturally tailored decision aid video on patient knowledge about clinical trials via a five unique question items survey.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)
Change in Clinical Trial Participation Decision-Making Self-Efficacy from Baseline to Post-Intervention: 11-item Decision Self-Efficacy Scale
Will assess the effect of a culturally tailored decision aid video on clinical trial participation decision-making self-efficacy using the 11-item Decision Self-Efficacy Scale. The 11-item Decision Self-Efficacy Scale measures self-confidence or belief in one's abilities in decision making. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more decision self-efficacy and a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)
Acceptability of the intervention
Participants will complete a post-intervention survey to assess acceptability of the video intervention. This survey is a 5-item measure; items responded to on a Likert-type scale with higher scores indicating higher acceptability.
Time frame: At post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center →