ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06188819Updated Jan 10, 2024

Rolled Pericardium Versus Cryopreserved Allograft to Treat Native or Prosthetic Aortic Infection

An observational study in Aortic Infections and Inflammations, sponsored by University Paul Sabatier of Toulouse. Active, not recruiting. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-10.

Sponsored by University Paul Sabatier of Toulouse · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
150
Sex
All
01

Study summary

While surgery with anatomic reconstruction of prosthetic aortic infections and native infectious aortitis has become established over time, the ideal substitute is not clearly defined. The cryopreserved arterial allograft (AAC) recognized as resistant to infections not only presents availability problems making its use complicated, particularly in emergencies, with a certain number of long-term aneurysmal developments. The tubulized pericardium patch (PP), available in all cases, seems to give promising results in recent literature. The investigators propose a comparative study of these two substitutes in this indication.

We carried out a two-center observational study including retrospectively from January 2010 to July 2023 all patients operated on for aortic prosthesis infection and native infectious aortitis with AAC reconstruction and prospectively PP patch reconstructions from July 2018 to July 2023. The diagnosis of infection was established according to the MAGIC criteria. The patients' preoperative comorbidities were collected to compare the groups. Postoperative morbidity and mortality was then compared. The medium-term evaluation consisted of comparing according to the Kaplan Meier method: postoperative mortality, permeability, reinfection rate, reoperation rate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Infections and Inflammations

Browse trials for

03

In context

Inflammation

3,536 studies on the registry are indexed under Inflammation; 642 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 150 is above the median of 100 across 864 observational studies indexed under Inflammation.

Browse Inflammation studies →

Lead sponsor

University Paul Sabatier of Toulouse is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patients operated on for a native infection or an aortic prosthesis who had pericardium or allograft reconstruction

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All aortic intervention performed for native aortic infection reconstruction with patch or allograft
  • All aortic intervention performed for infected graft reconstruction with patch or allograft

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cryopreserved arterial allograft

    Aortic infection treated by cryopreserved arterial allograft

    Procedure: Explantation of a previous aortic graft or endograft and reconstruction by arterial allograft or rolled pericardium

  • Rolled pericardium patch

    Aortic infection treated by Pericardium patch rolled

    Procedure: Explantation of a previous aortic graft or endograft and reconstruction by arterial allograft or rolled pericardium

Interventions

  • ProcedureExplantation of a previous aortic graft or endograft and reconstruction by arterial allograft or rolled pericardium

    In situ reconstruction with explantation of the infected graft or endograft and reconstruction by allograft or pericardium

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Number of patients death during post operative stay

    Time frame: day 30 post operative

  2. Reintervention

    Rate of reintervention during post operative stay

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

  3. Post operative Major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE)

    Rate of nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death

    Time frame: day 30 post operative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Permeability

    Rate of reintervention for occlusion of the patch or the allograft

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

  2. Reinfection

    Rate of reintervention for infection of the patch or the allograft

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 10, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06188819
Lead sponsor
University Paul Sabatier of Toulouse
Collaborators
LUCAS BATISTELLA, MD, Kheira hireche, MD, Ludovic CANAUD, MD PhD
Responsible party
Aurélien Hostalrich (Clinical Professor, University Paul Sabatier of Toulouse) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 3, 2024
Start date
Jan 1, 2010
Primary completion
Jan 2, 2010
Completion
Jun 15, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 10, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion