A Phase 4 interventional study of Amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day i.v. combined with flucytosine four times per day orally for the first 4 weeks. and Amphotericin B 0.7 mg/kg/day i.v. combined with flucytosine four times per day orally for the first 4 weeks. in Cryptococcal Meningitis and Antifungal Agents, sponsored by Huashan Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-21.
Sponsored by Huashan Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gatti are important causes of central nervous system (CNS) infections with significant mortality, remaining a great public health challenge worldwide. Commonly seen as an opportunistic infection in adults with HIV/AIDS, cryptococcal meningitis (CM) accounts for 15% of HIV-related mortality globally [1]. In addition, a growing number of non-HIV CM patients have been observed in recent years with fatality approaching 30% in some areas [2,3]. It occurs in both those with natural or iatrogenic immunosuppression, as well as the apparently immunocompetent individuals. Approximately 65-70% of non-HIV CM patients were without any predisposing factors, particularly in the East Asia [4,5]. With the increasing number of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, solid organ transplantation recipients and administration of immunosuppressive and corticosteroids agents, this illness will assume even greater public health significance.
Current Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guideline suggest the use of combination antifungal therapy: normal dose amphotericin (0.7-1mg/kg/day) combined with flucytosine for a minimum of 4 weeks, followed by fluconazole (600-800 mg/day) for a minimum of 10 weeks in total for HIV patients [6]. However, for non-HIV and immunocompetent patients, the treatment remains controversial. IDSA guideline recommended that the treatment of non-HIV patients could refer to the treatment of HIV patients. That is, amphotericin B combined with flucytosine is still administered in the induction period. However, as amphotericin B have nonspecific effect on ergosterol, it has strong side effects (hepatorenal toxicity, electrolyte disorder, anemia, ventricular fibrillation, etc.). Therefore, the dose of amphotericin B may not be appropriate for Asian patients due to the different drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic. In the prospective studies of Bennett[7] and Dismuke[8], low dose amphotericin B (0.3 mg/kg/d) combined with flucytosine achieved response rates of 66% and 85% at 6 weeks, respectively. A similar conclusion was also extracted from a large multicenter retrospective study that low dose amphotericin B (\<0.7 mg/kg/d) combined with flucytosine for a minimum of 2 weeks, followed by fluconazole could achieve a response rate of 84%, indicating that the efficacy of low dose amphotericin B (\< 0.7 mg/kg/d) may be equivalent with normal dose in non-HIV patients. Therefore, we plan to conduct a prospective, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of normal dose amphotericin B (0.7 mg/kg/ d) and low dose amphotericin B (0.5 mg/kg/d) in the initial antifungal treatment for non-HIV cryptococcal meningitis patients.
54 studies on the registry are indexed under Meningitis, Cryptococcal; 6 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 143 across 35 interventional studies indexed under Meningitis, Cryptococcal.
Browse Meningitis, Cryptococcal studies →Huashan Hospital is the lead sponsor of 247 studies on the registry; 104 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
HIV
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Immunosuppression
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Creatinine clearance (CrCl)
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ALT and AST (liver enzymes)
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ULN (upper limit of normal)
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Bilirubin
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Study regimen 1: amphotericin B 0.7 mg/kg/day i.v. plus flucytosine for 4 weeks
Drug: Amphotericin B 0.7 mg/kg/day i.v. combined with flucytosine four times per day orally for the first 4 weeks.
Amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day i.v. plus flucytosine for 4 weeks
Drug: Amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day i.v. combined with flucytosine four times per day orally for the first 4 weeks.
Drug page: Amphotericin B
Different amphotericin B dosage
Drug page: Amphotericin B
Different amphotericin B dosage
Mortality rate at 4 weeks after randomization.
The primary end point was mortality rate at 4 weeks after randomization. Mortality was treated as a binary variable, and the generalized linear model (GLM) was used for non-inferiority test. Point estimation and one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) estimation of mortality difference between the two groups will be performed. If the upper limit value of 95% CI is less than 0.10 of the non-inferiority margin, the research result is considered to be in line with the non-inferiority margin. Kaplan-meier was used to draw the four week survival curves of the two groups, and log rank method was used to test the survival curves. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to analyze the risk of death (HR) and 95% CI of the two groups. Sensitivity analysis: in the above analysis, the patients who lost the follow-up within 4 weeks were excluded for sensitivity analysis; The above non inferiority test GLM analysis and cox model included confounding variables (baseline Log10 fungal load, w
Time frame: 4 weeks
EFA rate at 2 weeks after randomization
All recorded longitudinal quantitative fungal count measurements up to day 35 (allowing for some delays in the day 28 measurements) will be included in the analysis. EFA will be modeled based on a linear mixed effects model with longitudinal log10-CSF quantitative culture fungal counts as the outcome, interaction terms between the treatment groups and the time since enrolment of the measurement as fixed covariates and random patient-specific intercepts and slopes. The lowest measurable quantitative count is 5 CFU/ml and values below the detection limit (which correspond to recorded values of 0) will be treated as \<4.5 CFU/ml, i.e. non-detectable measurements will be treated as left-censored longitudinal observations in the analysis. Based on this model, EFA will be compared between the 3 treatment arms in all patients (intention to treat), in the per-protocol population, and subgroups defined by immune status (immunocompromised; immunocompetent) and baseline fungal burden.
Time frame: 2 weeks
urvival until 2 weeks, 10 weeks and 6 months after randomization
Overall survival will be visualized using Kaplan-Meier curves and modeled using the Cox proportional hazards regression model with stratification by immune status. In addition, survival will be modeled with a multivariable Cox regression model including the following covariates in addition to the treatment group: baseline log10-fungal load, Glasgow coma score less than 15 (yes or no) and immune status.
Time frame: up to 6 months
Disability at 10 weeks and 6 months
The disability score at week 10 follow-up is defined as the higher (worse) of " the three simple questions" and the modified Rankin score assessed at that time point, and will be categorized as good outcome, intermediate disability, severe disability, or death (in case the patient died before 10 weeks) as previously described (wellcome-45). The ordinal 10-week score ("good"\>"intermediate"\>"severe"\> "death") will be compared between the 3 arms with a proportional odds logistic regression model depending on the treatment arm. The result will be summarized as a cumulative odds ratio with corresponding 95% confidence interval and P value. Patients lost to follow up will be analyzed according to their last recorded disability status. If the rate of patients lost to follow-up exceeds 10%, we will also perform an alternative analysis based on multiple imputation of missing values. The three simple questions and the modified Rankin score are listed in Appendix 4.
Time frame: up to 6 months
Adverse events
The frequency of serious and grade 3\&4 adverse reactions as well as the frequency of specific adverse events will be summarized (both in terms of the total number of events as well as the number of patients with at least one event). The proportion of patients with at least one such event (overall and for each specific event separately) will be summarized and (informally) compared between the 3 treatment groups based on χ2 test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. 6) Visual deficit at 10 weeks and 6 months
Time frame: 4 weeks
Visual deficit at 10 weeks and 6 months
The visual acuity at 10 weeks is recorded on a 6 point scale (see Appendix 5) and will be summarized by treatment arm for each eye separately, and overall where "overall" is defined as the worst recorded acuity of either eye. The odds of having "normal acuity" (amongst all surviving patients with a visual assessment) will be informally compared between the treatment arms with a logistic regression model adjusted for immune status.
Time frame: up to 6 months
Time to new neurological event or death until 10 weeks
The time to the first new neurological event or death until 10 weeks will be analyzed in the same way as overall survival. Longitudinal measurements of intracranial pressure during the first 2 weeks will be modeled using a mixed effect model as described for the primary outcome.
Time frame: up to 10 weeks
Rate of IRIS at 10 weeks and 6 months
The rate of IRIS and the rate of relapse (defined as antifungal treatment intensification or re-treatment) will be modeled with cause-specific proportional hazards models with treatment as the only covariate and stratification by immune status.
Time frame: up to 6 months
Plan to share: No
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Amphotericin B