ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06171555Updated Mar 27, 2024

Efficacy of CTM for Tennis ELbow

A Phase 2 interventional study of CTM and Celestone in Tennis Elbow, Lateral Epicondylitis \(Tennis Elbow\) and Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy, sponsored by Indiana Hand to Shoulder Center. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-27.

Sponsored by Indiana Hand to Shoulder Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2023, registered Nov 2023).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, the objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of a single application of human Connective Tissue Allograft (CTA) as a treatment of LET. CTM Biomedical markets and distributes decellularized particulate human placental connective-tissue matrix products, intended solely for homologous use to supplement or replace damaged or inadequate connective-tissue. These are structural tissue allografts processed according to the criteria contained in 21CFR 1271.10(a) for regulation solely under section 361 of the Public Health Service Act. Drug/Device Handling: If the research involves drugs or device, describe your plans to store, handle, and administer those drugs or devices so that they will be used only on subjects and be used only by authorized investigators.

Read the detailed description

Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy (LET) is considered an overload injury of the extensor tendons of the forearm where they attach at the lateral epicondyle. LET is a common condition encountered both in primary care and specialty clinics. A population-based study reported an incidence of 3.4 (95% CI, 3.3-3.5) per 1000. The highest incidence was among individuals aged 40 to 49 years, with 7.8 per 1000 in male patients and 10.2 per 1000 in female patients. Work restrictions were reported in 16% of the patients, and 4% reported missing 1 to 12 weeks of work. The recurrence rate within 2 years was 8.5% and remained constant over time. The study data suggest that patients without resolution after 6 months of onset may have a prolonged disease course and may need surgical intervention. The patient demographic is typically active in the workforce and LET related absenteeism results in a substantial economic impact. Pain relief, timely return to work, and avoidance of surgical intervention are therefore important LET treatment goals. Patients suffering from LET are grouped into 2 entities: Group 1 experience symptoms in an acute (tendinitis) phase that is largely influenced by the local inflammation stemming from over-use activities. Group 2 developed tendon degeneration and/or bony responses due to a persistent, chronic (tendinosis) pathology. Histologic specimens from chronic cases confirm that tendinosis is not an acute inflammatory condition but rather a failure of the normal tendon repair mechanism associated with angio-fibroblastic degeneration. The cause of elbow tendinosis is most likely a combination of mechanical overloading and abnormal microvascular responses. Further research into the precise cause of tendinosis is, however, still needed. The chief complaint in both groups is elbow pain with or without activity. Numerous methods have been advocated for treating LET including rest, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication, bracing, physical therapy, iontophoresis, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, and botulism toxin. Injections of corticosteroids or whole blood, and various types of surgical procedures have also been recommended. The utility of several of these treatments has recently come into question. For example, one recent report noted that there is no difference between using corticosteroid or local anesthetic when treating elbow tendinosis with an injection. A recent review of common growth factors suggested human CTA may be useful for tendon and ligament healing in vivo.

The primary study endpoint is based on the hypothesis that treatment of LET with a single application of CTA will provide a clinically meaningful improvement of the Patient-Related Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) Pain Subscale Secondary endpoints include VAS pain and elbow range of motion. Secondary endpoints also include PROMIS scores of pain interference and depression. A single assessment numerical evaluation (SANE) of elbow function will also be obtained.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tennis Elbow
  • Lateral Epicondylitis \(Tennis Elbow\)
  • Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy

Browse trials for

03

In context

Tennis Elbow

296 studies on the registry are indexed under Tennis Elbow; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 54 is close to the median of 50 across 262 interventional studies indexed under Tennis Elbow.

Browse Tennis Elbow studies →

Lead sponsor

Indiana Hand to Shoulder Center is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Males or females age 18 or older
  2. Patients presenting with symptomatic lateral epicondylitis for at least 6 weeks
  3. Patients who have not had a meaningful symptomatic improvement after 6 weeks of physical therapy
  4. Patients who can consent to be a part of this study
  5. Patients who are able to return to the Indiana Hand to Shoulder Center or a satellite location for follow up time points

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous surgery to the lateral side of the elbow
  2. Systemic inflammatory conditions (RA, psoriatic arthritis, lupus, etc)
  3. Previous elbow injection within the last 6 months
  4. History of recent elbow trauma
  5. Patients actively involved in workman's compensation cases
  6. Non-English Speaking Patients
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
54 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care Steroid Injection

    Group 1 Control Group: standard corticosteroid injection: 1cc of celestone (6mg) diluted with 1 cc of 1% lidocaine and inject at the ECRB origin at area of maximal pain when palpated.

    Drug: Celestone

  • Experimental
    Test CTM Injection

    Group 2 Test Group: CTM injection: 1cc of CTM Boost will be diluted with 1 cc of 1% lidocaine and injected at the ECRB origin at area of maximal pain when palpated. CTM Boost is a connective tissue matrix suspended in saline. (injection will need to be with a 23 gauge needle and 3 cc syringe)

    Device: CTM

Interventions

  • DeviceCTM

    decellularized particulate human placental connective-tissue matrix products, intended solely for homologous use to supplement or replace damaged or inadequate connective-tissue. These are structural tissue allografts processed according to the criteria contained in 21CFR 1271.10(a) for regulation solely under section 361 of the Public Health Service Act.

    Also known as: Connective Tissue Matrix

  • standard of care

    Also known as: Corticosteroid

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-Related Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) Pain Subscale

    PROM

    Time frame: 6 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. VAS Pain

    pain

    Time frame: 6 Months

  2. PROMIS Pain Interference

    PROM

    Time frame: 6 Months

  3. PROMIS Depression

    PROM

    Time frame: 6 Months

  4. Grip Strength

    grip strength taken with a calibrated jamar instrument

    Time frame: 6 Months

  5. Range of Motion

    wrist range of motion measured with a goniometer with elbow both flexed and extended

    Time frame: 6 Months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 35 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 30, 2023
First posted
Dec 14, 2023
StartActual
Jan 26, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Mar 27, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06171555
Lead sponsor
Indiana Hand to Shoulder Center
Collaborators
CTM Biomedical
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 14, 2023
Start date
Jan 26, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 27, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion