ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06162520Updated Dec 8, 2023

Congenital Biliary Dilatation Diagnosis Based on 3D Morphological Characteristics

An observational study in Congenital Biliary Dilatation, sponsored by Tsinghua University. Completed at 1 site in China. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-08.

Sponsored by Tsinghua University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
550
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Congenital biliary dilatation necessitates timely intervention owing to potential complications. This study endeavors to enhance diagnostic precision using quantitative three-dimensional morphological characteristics. Objectives involve developing models to differentiate congenital from secondary biliary dilatation and identify intrahepatic involvement. Employing machine learning, robust diagnostic models aim to elevate clinical detection rates and improve accuracy.

Read the detailed description

Congenital biliary dilatation is a primary anomaly affecting the biliary tract. It can involve the extrahepatic bile ducts, intrahepatic bile ducts, or the entire biliary system, including the common bile duct. Patients with congenital biliary dilatation exhibit abnormal expansion of the bile duct system, which can lead to complications such as bile duct stones, pancreatic inflammation, and even bile duct cancer. Timely and accurate diagnosis, followed by surgical intervention to remove the dilated bile duct lesion, is crucial for the treatment of choledochal dilation. However, the differentiation of congenital biliary dilatation in clinical practice poses challenges, primarily due to the limitations of subjective physician experience and macroscopic imaging features, making it difficult to achieve high sensitivity in discerning congenital biliary dilatation. Particularly, in distinguishing between congenital biliary dilatation and secondary biliary dilatation, the similarities of the bile ducts limit the precision of clinical decisions. Therefore, this study aims to address the current challenges in the differential diagnosis of congenital biliary dilatation and secondary biliary dilatation by quantitatively describing the morphology of dilated bile ducts. Moreover, this study plans to build a predictive model of intrahepatic bile duct dilatation to provide more comprehensive clinical support. Specifically, the research objectives are outlined as follows:

  1. Establish a diagnostic model for congenital biliary dilatation utilizing three-dimensional morphological characteristics, especially quantitative shape- and diameter-based characteristics, to enhance the accurate discrimination between congenital biliary dilatation and secondary biliary dilatation.
  2. Develop a model for identifying intrahepatic involvement of congenital biliary dilatation, aiming to provide more precise information for surgical planning and supportive treatment.
  3. Construct robust diagnostic models using machine learning with quantitative three-dimensional morphological characteristics, aiming to increase clinical detection rates and accuracy, thereby achieving risk stratification for patients with biliary dilatation.
02

Conditions studied

  • Congenital Biliary Dilatation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Choledochal Cyst

22 studies on the registry are indexed under Choledochal Cyst; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 550 is above the median of 400 across 14 observational studies indexed under Choledochal Cyst.

Browse Choledochal Cyst studies →

Lead sponsor

Tsinghua University is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with congenital biliary dilatation diagnosed according to the Japanese Study Group on Congenital Biliary Dilatation (JSCBD) guideline or secondary bile duct dilatation due to choledocholithiasis or malignancies such as hilar cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic carcinoma, and distal cholangiocarcinoma who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) at Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital from 2014 to 2022.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patients with biliary dilation who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) at Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital from 2014 to 2022.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients without pre-operative CECT scans or developing cholangiocarcinoma due to congenital biliary dilatation.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
550 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Congenital biliary dilatation

    Patients with congenital biliary dilatation diagnosed according to the Japanese Study Group on Congenital Biliary Dilatation (JSCBD) guideline.

    Other: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and 3D morphological analysis

  • Secondary biliary dilatation

    Patients with secondary biliary dilatation attributed to choledocholithiasis or malignancies (hilar cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic carcinoma, and distal cholangiocarcinoma).

    Other: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and 3D morphological analysis

Interventions

  • OtherContrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and 3D morphological analysis

    Diagnosis models are established using quantitative morphological characteristics extracted from the 3D reconstructed bile duct from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) of the diagnostic models for the differential diagnosis of congenital and secondary biliary dilatation and the identification of intrahepatic involvement

    The area under the ROC curve is calculated by integrating the ROC curve, which plots Sensitivity against 1 - Specificity.

    Time frame: Pre-operation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Area under the Precision-Recall curve (AUPRC) of the diagnostic models for the differential diagnosis of congenital and secondary biliary dilatation and the identification of intrahepatic involvement

    The area under the precision-recall curve is determined by integrating the Precision-Recall curve, which plots Precision against Recall.

    Time frame: Pre-operation

  2. Sensitivity of the diagnostic models for the differential diagnosis of congenital and secondary biliary dilatation and the identification of intrahepatic involvement

    Sensitivity is calculated as the ratio of true positives to the sum of true positives and false negatives.

    Time frame: Pre-operation

  3. Specificity of the diagnostic models for the differential diagnosis of congenital and secondary biliary dilatation and the identification of intrahepatic involvement

    Specificity is calculated as the ratio of true negatives to the sum of true negatives and false positives.

    Time frame: Pre-operation

  4. Accuracy of the diagnostic models for the differential diagnosis of congenital and secondary biliary dilatation and the identification of intrahepatic involvement

    Accuracy is calculated as the ratio of the sum of true positives and true negatives to the total number of cases.

    Time frame: Pre-operation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing 102218, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ishibashi H, Shimada M, Kamisawa T, Fujii H, Hamada Y, Kubota M, Urushihara N, Endo I, Nio M, Taguchi T, Ando H; Japanese Study Group on Congenital Biliary Dilatation (JSCBD). Japanese clinical practice guidelines for congenital biliary dilatation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017 Jan;24(1):1-16. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.415. Epub 2017 Jan 22. PubMed 28111910 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Dec 2021 to primary completion in Dec 2022, 11 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 29, 2023
First posted
Dec 8, 2023
StartActual
Dec 17, 2021
Primary completionActual
Dec 16, 2022
CompletionActual
Dec 16, 2022
Last update
Dec 8, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 8, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06162520
Lead sponsor
Tsinghua University
Responsible party
Jiaqi Dou (Principal Investigator, Tsinghua University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 8, 2023
Start date
Dec 17, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 16, 2022
Completion
Dec 16, 2022
Last update
Dec 8, 2023

Study contacts

Huijun Chen, Ph.D.
study director · Tsinghua University
Jiahong Dong, M.D.
study chair · Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion