ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06158347HBOTUpdated Nov 20, 2024

Efficacy and Safety of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Radiation Dermatitis in Patients with Localized Breast Cancer

An interventional study of hyperbaric oxygen chamber in Breast Cancer and Radiation Dermatitis, sponsored by Ilsan Cha hospital. Completed at 1 site in South Korea. Open to female participants aged 19 Years to 69 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-20.

Sponsored by Ilsan Cha hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 69 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aimed to evaluate reducing the incidence of radiation dermatitis by assigning hyperbaric oxygen therapy to patients with localized breast cancer.

Read the detailed description

To evaluate the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on the prevention of radiation dermatitis, patients with localized breast cancer between the ages of 19 and 69 were randomly assigned to HBOT group and usual care group in a 1:1 ratio during the period of adjuvant radiotherapy.

The primary purpose of this study was to administer oxygen therapy three times a week during the radiotherapy period for those who were recommended to receive radiotherapy with a Biological equivalent dose (BED10) of 60 Gy or more as adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery to determine the radiation at the end of radiotherapy. The purpose is to compare the incidence of radiation dermatitis of therapy oncology group grade (RTOG grade) grade 2 or higher between the two groups.

The secondary purpose of this study is to evaluate/compare the following items in the relevant treatment group.

  1. Comparison of the incidence of radiation dermatitis according to RTOG grade
  2. Catterall skin scoring profile score comparison
  3. Comparison of Skindex-29 questionnaire scores
  4. Numeric rating scale score comparison
  5. Investigation of radiation therapy dose, frequency, schedule, and medical history
  6. Health-related quality of life questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)
  7. Health-related quality of life measurement tool (EQ-5D)
  8. Safety evaluation
  9. Health-related quality of life measurement tool (EQ-5D)
02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer
  • Radiation Dermatitis
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,828 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,923 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 72 across 9,498 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Ilsan Cha hospital is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 69 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Between the ages of 19 and 69
  2. Patients with biopsy confirmed invasive breast cancer
  3. Patients who have undergone breast-conserving surgery for the purpose of tumor resection and require adjuvant radiotherapy or have undergone adjuvant radiotherapy within 5 times.
  4. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1
  5. Those who understand the content of the study, agree to participate in the study, and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with distant metastases of cancer
  2. Those whose cancer has invaded the skin of the breast (T4) or who have unhealed wounds on the skin
  3. Patients who have a history of radiotherapy of the cervical thoracic region for other reasons in the past
  4. Patients with a history of connective tissue disease
  5. Subjects with uncontrolled diabetes with HbA1c 7.0 or higher
  6. Pneumothorax and symptomatic upper respiratory tract infection
  7. If it is judged that there will be a significant decrease in respiratory function
  8. Undergoing treatments known to interact with hyperbaric oxygen therapy, such as cisplatin, doxorubicin, bleomycin, disulfiram, etc.
  9. When it is judged that diseases other than cancer (dementia, cerebrovascular disease, severe renal failure, etc.) may have a significant effect on the decline of physical function.
  10. If it is determined that the life expectancy is not sufficient follow-up within 3 months.
  11. Pregnant and lactating women
  12. Other persons who are judged by the researcher to be unsuitable for research
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HBOT group

    Hyperbaric oxygen therapy allows the patient to breathe 100% oxygen through an O2 Fresh M50 (HBOT Medical, Wonju, South Korea) chamber. Upon entering the chamber, oxygen is supplied while gradually increasing the atmospheric pressure from normal atmospheric pressure to 1.5 atmospheres absolute (ATA). If the intensity acceptable to the clinical research subject is lower than 1.5 ATA, maintain it at the point acceptable to the research subject and record that value.

    Device: hyperbaric oxygen chamber

  • No intervention
    control group

    The control group will receive systemic education in dermal care and will be under the instruction of usual self-care.

Interventions

  • Devicehyperbaric oxygen chamber

    Hyperbaric oxygen therapy allows patients to breathe 100% oxygen through an O2 Fresh M50 (HBOT Medical, Wonju, South Korea) chamber. Upon entering the chamber, oxygen is supplied by gradually increasing the barometric pressure from normal pressure to 1.5 atmospheres absolute (ATA).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. incidence of grade 2 or more dermatitis according to RTOG toxicity scale

    ① Grade 0: No change before or after treatment (No change over baseline) * Grade 1: Cystic lesions, erythema with faint or reduced skin luster, implantation, dry epidermis shedding, and decreased sweating. (Follicular, faint or dull erythema, epilation, dry desquamation, decreased sweating) * Grade 2: Tender or bright erythema, ecchymosis, desquamation of the wet epidermis, and moderate edema. (Tender or bright erythema, patchy moist desquamation, moderate edema) * Grade 3: Confluent skin lesions, desquamation of the wet epidermis other than the area where the skin is folded, pitting edema (Confluent, moist desquamation other than skin folds, pitting edema) * Grade 4: Ulcerative bleeding, skin necrosis (Ulceration hemorrhage, necrosis)

    Time frame: At the end of 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. RTOG toxicity

    ① Grade 0: No change before or after treatment (No change over baseline) * Grade 1: Cystic lesions, erythema with faint or reduced skin luster, implantation, dry epidermis shedding, and decreased sweating. (Follicular, faint or dull erythema, epilation, dry desquamation, decreased sweating) * Grade 2: Tender or bright erythema, ecchymosis, desquamation of the wet epidermis, and moderate edema. (Tender or bright erythema, patchy moist desquamation, moderate edema) * Grade 3: Confluent skin lesions, desquamation of the wet epidermis other than the area where the skin is folded, pitting edema (Confluent, moist desquamation other than skin folds, pitting edema) * Grade 4: Ulcerative bleeding, skin necrosis (Ulceration hemorrhage, necrosis)

    Time frame: At the end of Day 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, week 9, week 10

  2. CSSP

    CSSP is a numerical scale-type evaluation tool developed by Fowler in 1965 to evaluate skin reactions in rats and modified by Catterall for application to patients with radiotherapy-induced dermatitis. \[14\] Graded from 1 to 10 points depending on the symptoms and severity of dermatitis

    Time frame: At the end of Day 1, week 5, week 8, week 9, week 10

  3. skindex-29

    Skindex-29 is a revision of the existing 61-item Skindex to 29 questions for patients with skin diseases. It maintains the excellent reproducibility, reliability, construct validity, and content validity of the Skindex, while improving the patient's quality of life through symptoms, function, and quality of life. It is a quality of life assessment tool designed to evaluate emotions on three scales. It consists of three scales: function (Fx), emotion (em), symptom (symptom) and a total score (total), linearly ranging from 0 (not affected) to 100 (always affected). A total of 29 items are scored for each scale, and then averaged to calculate the overall quality of life. The lower the score of Skindex-29, the better the quality of life.

    Time frame: At the end of Day 1, week 5, week 8, week 9, week 10

  4. NRS

    NRS is one of the evaluation tools that quantifies the level of discomfort. NRS 0 is defined as no discomfort, and NRS 10 is defined as the maximum discomfort the patient can think of.

    Time frame: At the end of Day 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, week 9, week 10

  5. EORTC

    This is a questionnaire developed with 30 questions to measure the general quality of life of tumor patients. It evaluates overall quality of life and emotional health by dividing it into five areas: physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social.

    Time frame: At the end of Day 1, week 5, week 8, week 9, week 10

  6. EQ-5D

    It is the most widely used method of indirect measurement among various indirect measurement methods as it evaluates health status from multiple aspects, and then indirectly calculates the weight of the quality of a specific health status using a preference score assigned in advance for each functional level. The EQ-5D-5L consists of five questions, each of which asks about mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, and anxiety/depression.

    Time frame: At the end of Day 1, week 5, week 8, week 9, week 10

  7. Drug Consumption

    The type, dose, route of administration, frequency, and purpose of medications administered or taken during the study period (medications prescribed due to current medical history or rescue drugs) will be recorded.

    Time frame: At the end of Day 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, week 9, week 10

  8. Adverse events

    To compare the occurrence of adverse events between the two groups and verify their safety. An adverse event is an undesirable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurs after a procedure in a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the procedure. The investigator will analyze the incidence of adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, and serious adverse events that are suspected to be associated with treatment.

    Time frame: At the end of Day 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, week 9, week 10

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Lee Jee Young
    Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10414, South Korea
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee JY, Hyun MH, Yang G, Lee S. Efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for radiation-induced dermatitis in patients with breast cancer: a randomized pilot study. Support Care Cancer. 2025 Apr 21;33(5):399. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09463-0. PubMed 40259026 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2023 to primary completion in Sep 2024, 10 months.

Of 2,274 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 69. This study's 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,347 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 69.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 6, 2023
First posted
Dec 6, 2023
StartActual
Nov 6, 2023
Primary completionActual
Sep 6, 2024
CompletionActual
Sep 25, 2024
Last update
Nov 20, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06158347
Lead sponsor
Ilsan Cha hospital
Responsible party
Jee Young Lee (assistant professor, CHA University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 6, 2023
Start date
Nov 6, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 6, 2024
Completion
Sep 25, 2024
Last update
Nov 20, 2024

Study contacts

Jee Youg Lee
principal investigator · Ilsan Cha hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion