ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06153576Updated Dec 11, 2023

The Value of Systematic Biopsies During Vertebroplasty for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

An observational study in Vertebral Compression Fracture, Myeloma and Bone Metastases, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 17 Years to 96 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-11.

Primary conditionPlasmacytomaRegistry: Neoplasms, Plasma CellReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Neoplasms, Plasma Cell — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Plasmacytoma
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Plasmacytoma, a narrower term within Neoplasms, Plasma Cell.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,120
Ages
17 Years to 96 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background : Vertebral fracture is the most common complication of osteoporosis. Vertebroplasty is a widespread treatment modality for osteoporotic vertebral fractures, providing consolidation, rapid pain relief and preventing secondary vertebral collapse. Performing a biopsy at the same time as the operation does not lengthen the procedure or increase the risk of complications. The question therefore arises as to whether it is cost-effective diagnostically: are non-osteoporotic vertebral lesions detected when biopsies are taken? Methods: The investigators carried out a single-centre retrospective study at Nice University Hospital.

From January 2016 to March 2022, 1729 biopsies were performed during 1439 vertebroplasty procedures on 1120 patients.

The pre-operative laboratory work-up included a blood count, a C-reactive protein assay and a coagulation test.

The imaging work-up systematically included MRI, unless contraindicated, in which case CT alone was performed.

Vertebroplasty was performed in an interventional CT suite under dual CT and fluoroscopic guidance. The systematic biopsy sample was then sent to the anatomopathology department for analysis.

Findings :

The samples detected cancer in 35 patients, including 5 (0.44%) for whom the pre-operative work-up had not raised any suspicion.

All the incidental findings were haemopathies, including 4 myelomas and one lymphoma.

Conclusion :

These results highlight the good performance of MRI in distinguishing osteoporotic vertebral fractures from solid tumour metastases.

However, an exhaustive pre-operative work-up does not seem to be able to formally rule out an underlying malignant lesion.

The investigators therefore recommend that biopsies be taken systematically when performing vertebroplasty.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vertebral Compression Fracture
  • Myeloma
  • Bone Metastases
  • Malignant Bone Tumour
  • Lymphoma
  • Plasmocytoma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Plasmacytoma Reclassified

34 studies on the registry are indexed under Plasmacytoma; 6 are open to participants now.

Browse Plasmacytoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice is the lead sponsor of 723 studies on the registry; 176 are open to participants now.

Compared within Plasmacytoma, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Neoplasms, Plasma Cell. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
17 Years to 96 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients who underwent a vertebroplasty with bone biopsy during the study period in the osteoarticular interventional radiology department of the Pasteur 2 hospital of the CHU of Nice

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • all patients who underwent a vertebroplasty with bone

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-vertebral bone
  • not performed during vertebroplasty
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,120 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of incidental discovery of malignant lesions during systematic biopsies for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures

    incidental findings of neoplasia during vertebroplasty for presumed osteoporotic fractures

    Time frame: 5 years and 2 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU NICE
    Nice, Alpes Maritimes 06000, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 11, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06153576
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 1, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2016
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2022
Completion
Mar 1, 2022
Last update
Dec 11, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion