CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06144866Updated Nov 28, 2023

Evaluataion of NOAC Levels in Acute Stroke

An observational study in Ischemic Stroke and Anticoagulant Adverse Reaction, sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-28.

Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started May 2020; still recruiting 6 years 5 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are recommended over warfarin in preventing stroke and thromboembolism among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in several guidelines. To evaluate the pharmacological effects of NOACs, directly measuring the concentration is the most arbitrary way since the correlation between concentration and common coagulation tests are not reliable. Our previous investigation reported under the fixed dose regimen, dabigatran exposure increased in elderly, renal impairments and patients with multiple co-morbid conditions. Our data also showed difference in NOACs exposure in Asians. For example, patients under rivaroxaban, in comparison to apxiaban, were more likely to have lower than expected range drug level. Furthermore, the NOACs concentration also affected by the prescription pattern of physicians (non-compliant to labeled dose) and patients' behavior (poor medication adherence).

The relationship between NOACs exposure and safety has been elucidated in large-scale clinical trials. As the NOACs level increased, the risk for bleeding increased, too. Nevertheless, no additional protection was noted with increased NOACs levels. In post marketing surveillance, bleeding and thrombotic events have been reported. Investigating the NOACs level among these patients helps evaluating the residual drug in the body, which could be a reference for clinical decision in emergent situation.

Specific purpose: Investigate the correlation between NOACs concentration upon the arrival of emergency department (ED) and important clinical outcomes including systemic thromboembolism, and major bleeding.

Direction for investigation:

  1. Prospectively record the NOACs concentration among AF patients under NOACs therapy and suffered from ischemic stroke (IS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and other major bleeding.
  2. Investigate the correlation between NOACs concentration upon ED arrival and thromboembolic or bleeding events.
  3. Propose a therapeutic range for NOACs, in order to provide a guide for important decision in acute setting.
Read the detailed description

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are recommended over warfarin in preventing stroke and thromboembolism among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in several guidelines. To evaluate the pharmacological effects of NOACs, directly measuring the concentration is the most arbitrary way since the correlation between concentration and common coagulation tests are not reliable. Our previous investigation reported under the fixed dose regimen, dabigatran exposure increased in elderly, renal impairments and patients with multiple co-morbid conditions. Our data also showed difference in NOACs exposure in Asians. For example, patients under rivaroxaban, in comparison to apxiaban, were more likely to have lower than expected range drug level. Furthermore, the NOACs concentration also affected by the prescription pattern of physicians (non-compliant to labeled dose) and patients' behavior (poor medication adherence).

The relationship between NOACs exposure and safety has been elucidated in large-scale clinical trials. As the NOACs level increased, the risk for bleeding increased, too. Nevertheless, no additional protection was noted with increased NOACs levels. In post marketing surveillance, bleeding and thrombotic events have been reported. Investigating the NOACs level among these patients helps evaluating the residual drug in the body, which could be a reference for clinical decision in emergent situation.

Specific purpose:

  1. Prospectively record the NOACs concentration among AF patients under NOACs therapy and suffered from IS, TIA, ICH or major bleeding.

    AF patients who presented to emergent department (ED) for acute IS, TIA, ICH (non-traumatic), or other major bleeding and was under NOACs therapy will be recruited to this study. Blood sample will be collected before acute management to measure NOACs concentration. Co-morbid disease, laboratory tests and concurrent medications will be retrieved from electronic medical records. The onset, location, severity of IS. ICH or other major bleeding, and the outcome and long-term managements will be prospectively recorded.

  2. Investigate the correlation between NOACs concentration and thromboembolic or bleeding events.

    For each NOACs, we are going to compare the differences in NOACs exposure between patients with thromboembolism or major bleedi. Important baseline characteristics, co-medications and disease severity will be adjusted before making comparison.

  3. Propose a therapeutic range for NOACs, in order to provide a guide for important decision in acute setting.

From the data of NOACs concentration among patients with IS or ICH, we plan to propose a therapeutic range with acceptable efficacy and safety for NOACs therapy. Our data will provide a guide for physicians to make important clinical decision.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ischemic Stroke
  • Anticoagulant Adverse Reaction

Keywords

  • Ischemic stroke
  • Intracranial hemorrhage
  • Direct oral anticoagulant
  • Drug level
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 160 across 1,692 observational studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,563 studies on the registry; 569 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patient under direct oral anticoagulant therapy and suffered from ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 20 years
  2. Having AF diagnosis
  3. Under NOACs therapy including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban.
  4. Admitted for acute IS, transient ischemic attack (TIA), ICH or major bleeding

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The ICH is resulted from trauma.
  2. Decline the inform consent.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
3 Years
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Interventions

  • DrugDabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban

    For patients who received direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) before ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage, the DOAC level upon hospital arrival will be measured.

    Also known as: Direct oral anticoagulants

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional outcome

    Functional status measured by using the modified Rankin Scale.

    Time frame: 3 months after stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH)

    Type 2 parenchymal hemorrhage on the follow-up neuroimage in 24 to 36 hours after EVT, with neurological deterioration of ≥4 points on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from baseline

    Time frame: 24-36 hours after stroke

  2. Early neurological improvement

    Reduction of 8 points or more in the NIHSS score within 24 hours.

    Time frame: 24 hours after stroke

  3. Successful reperfusion (in ischemic stroke patients receiving endovascular thrombectomy)

    Defined as Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale 2b to 3

    Time frame: Evaluated after EVT

  4. Recurrent ischemic stroke

    Neurological symptoms with ischemic lesion noted on neuroimaging

    Time frame: 3 years

  5. Recurrent intracranial hemorrhage

    Neurological symptoms with hemorrhagic lesion noted on neuroimaging

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, 100, Taiwan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 28, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06144866
Lead sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Responsible party
National Taiwan University Clinical Trial Center (Pharmacist, National Taiwan University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 22, 2023
Start date
May 1, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 28, 2023

Study contacts

Shin Yi Lin, M.S.
Contact
hsin924@ntuh.gov.tw
+88623123456 ext. 63699
Shin Yi Lin, M.S.
principal investigator · National Taiwan University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion