CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06141408Updated Oct 1, 2025

PrEP Intervention in Prince George's County, Maryland

An interventional study of MPowerment PrEP Promotion Intervention in Hiv, Mental Health Issue and Support, Family, sponsored by George Mason University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-01.

Sponsored by George Mason University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2022, registered Nov 2023).
  • Started Mar 2022; still recruiting 4 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The goal of the proposed research is to design a peer-based community intervention focused on addressing HIV stigma, and peer support to increase PrEP initiation in Prince George's County, MD. Participants will attend intervention events focused on stigma reduction and building community. Researchers will compare intervention and control group participants to see if there in a difference in PrEP initiation and adherence.

Read the detailed description

Black gay, bisexual, and other Black sexual minority men (BSMM) are a priority population and experience the highest rate of new HIV infections in the United States. Maryland (MD) is an HIV epicenter and ranks 4th in AIDS cases nationally; the state has several hotspots of HIV and AIDS cases in geographically distinct areas, including urban, suburban, and rural settings. Prince George's (PG) County is a majority Black suburban county (63% Black) bordering Washington, DC, with the highest per capita income for Black people in the nation, yet the second highest incidence and prevalence of HIV in the DC greater metropolitan area. It is an understudied region in the "Ending the Epidemic" initiative to end HIV in the United States. Despite the availability of PrEP for prevention and overall economic resources in this area, uptake among BSMM remains low. Greater understanding of factors impacting PrEP utilization among BSMM in this population and region of the U.S. are necessary for successful HIV prevention for BSMM. Additionally, extant literature specific to PrEP use in PG county is extremely limited.

Internalized stigma is an important and understudied factor that can deter PrEP use among BSMM, similar to the well documented associations between internalized stigma and several HIV risk behaviors among SMM. Research has consistently shown the impact of stigma on several HIV-related outcomes among SMM, including HIV stigma that deters uptake of HIV prevention. In contrast, social support can facilitate HIV prevention behaviors. Internalized stigma and peer social support are potentially modifiable factors that may directly impact PrEP acceptability and PrEP stigma; the associations between internalized stigma and PrEP use are still notably understudied. Despite this, interventions promoting PrEP use have largely not addressed internalized stigma as a potential barrier to uptake.

The goal of the proposed research is to design a peer-based community intervention focused on addressing HIV stigma, HIV knowledge, and peer BSMM support to increase PrEP initiation in Prince George's County, MD. The investigators will adapt the MPowerment peer-based model: This is a CDC-developed evidence-based intervention originally designed to reduce sexual risk and improve peer support through the use of peer-led activities and discussions, often in a drop-in center. There have been several successful adaptations of the MPowerment model in different settings. The investigators are adapting the model to focus on improving PrEP initiation through focusing on peer support, and reducing internalized stigma, including HIV stigma, through peer-led events and activities. The following are our aims:

Aim 1. Using ethnographic methods (participant and direct observation), study peer-peer interactions/exchanges and HIV prevention communications in two ongoing MPowerment programs, one in Falls Church, VA (suburban) and the other in Washington, DC (urban).

Aim 2. Conduct 32 in depth interviews to inform adapting an MPowerment intervention to reduce internalized stigma and increase PrEP uptake among BSMM in PG County. This would inform intervention site selection, promotion materials, and design of events and activities.

Aim 3. Pilot test a community-based pretest-posttest intervention (n=130) to increase PrEP uptake in PG County, based on the MPowerment model, with a focus on reducing internalized HIV stigma and increasing social support and resilience.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hiv
  • Mental Health Issue
  • Support, Family

Keywords

  • HIV
  • Stigma
  • Support
  • PrEP
03

In context

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

2,040 studies on the registry are indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; 272 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 105 across 1,543 interventional studies indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.

Browse Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

George Mason University is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Male
  • Black
  • HIV-negative
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Either residing in Prince George's County Maryland, or having a sexual partner in Prince George's County Maryland within the past year.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • HIV Positive
  • Refusal of HIV testing
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MPowerment PrEP Promotion Intervention

    This is the arm engaging in the stigma-reduction and support-increasing activities aimed to increase PrEP use.

    Behavioral: MPowerment PrEP Promotion Intervention

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care

    This is the arm not engaging in the stigma-reduction and support-increasing activities. This arm will receive standard referreals to PrEP knowledge resources and providers.

Interventions

  • BehavioralMPowerment PrEP Promotion Intervention

    In-person events will focus on five specific goals: Fostering a sense of community acceptance and social connection, promoting self-acceptance of sexual identity, teaching skills for navigating healthcare, reducing PrEP stigma, and providing education on HIV risk. In accordance with the MPowerment model, In collaboration with the PI, the core group and volunteers would lead the development, implementation, and evaluation of all intervention events. Both peer leaders and the primary investigator will collaborate to develop specific events ("M-Groups"), guided by the findings in both the quantitative and qualitative studies. M-Groups will be held once every month. Events will be 2 hour activities focused on the aforementioned goals.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with a PreP prescription within one month of intervention completion.

    This is the number of participants who receive an initial prescription for Pre-exposure prophylaxis. Investigators will refer individuals participating in the intervention for PrEP use. Those who provide either a PrEP prescription, or a PrEP bottle with their prescription information, will be considered as initiating PrEP use.

    Time frame: Within 1 month of intervention completion.

  2. Number of participants with a positive blood spot test for PrEP 6 months following the intervention.

    6 months following the intervention completion, investigators will mail a blood spot collection kit to participants, with return postage. When mailed back, investigators will test the dried blood spots for the presence of PrEP using a chemistry analyzer. Those who test positive will be considered as "PrEP adherent".

    Time frame: 6 months post-intervention.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • George Mason University
    Fairfax, Virginia 22030, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sullivan PS, Mena L, Elopre L, Siegler AJ. Implementation Strategies to Increase PrEP Uptake in the South. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2019 Aug;16(4):259-269. doi: 10.1007/s11904-019-00447-4. PubMed 31177363 ↗
  • Sun Z, Gu Q, Dai Y, Zou H, Agins B, Chen Q, Li P, Shen J, Yang Y, Jiang H. Increasing awareness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and willingness to use HIV PrEP among men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global data. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022 Mar;25(3):e25883. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25883. PubMed 35255193 ↗
  • Hillis A, Germain J, Hope V, McVeigh J, Van Hout MC. Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Prevention Among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM): A Scoping Review on PrEP Service Delivery and Programming. AIDS Behav. 2020 Nov;24(11):3056-3070. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02855-9. PubMed 32274670 ↗
  • Golub SA. PrEP Stigma: Implicit and Explicit Drivers of Disparity. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018 Apr;15(2):190-197. doi: 10.1007/s11904-018-0385-0. PubMed 29460223 ↗
  • Calabrese SK. Understanding, Contextualizing, and Addressing PrEP Stigma to Enhance PrEP Implementation. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020 Dec;17(6):579-588. doi: 10.1007/s11904-020-00533-y. Epub 2020 Sep 23. PubMed 32965576 ↗
  • Johnson J, Radix A, Copeland R, Chacon G. Building Racial and Gender Equity into a National PrEP Access Program. J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(S1):55-59. doi: 10.1017/jme.2022.37. PubMed 35902091 ↗
  • Touger R, Wood BR. A Review of Telehealth Innovations for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP). Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2019 Feb;16(1):113-119. doi: 10.1007/s11904-019-00430-z. PubMed 30701404 ↗
  • Dangerfield DT 2nd, Lipson A, Anderson JN. HIV PrEP Clinician Communication Preferences Among Black Sexual Minority Men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2022 Apr;34(2):168-181. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2022.34.2.168. PubMed 35438541 ↗
  • Bavinton BR, Grulich AE. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: scaling up for impact now and in the future. Lancet Public Health. 2021 Jul;6(7):e528-e533. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00112-2. Epub 2021 Jun 2. PubMed 34087117 ↗
  • Sullivan PS, Siegler AJ. Getting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to the people: opportunities, challenges and emerging models of PrEP implementation. Sex Health. 2018 Nov;15(6):522-527. doi: 10.1071/SH18103. PubMed 30476461 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 14, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The investigators are still working on developing a plan for data dissemination.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 1, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06141408
Lead sponsor
George Mason University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 21, 2023
Start date
Mar 31, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2025

Study contacts

Rodman Turpin, PhD
Contact
rturpin@gmu.edu
2024651249
Rodman Turpin, PhD
principal investigator · George Mason University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion