CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06120426Updated Nov 13, 2023

En Bloc Resection Versus Separation Surgery Combined With Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Spinal Oligometastatic Tumor.

An observational study in Spinal Metastases, Spinal Tumor and Radiotherapy, sponsored by Shanghai Changzheng Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-13.

Sponsored by Shanghai Changzheng Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
182
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to explore the impact of En bloc surgery and separation surgery combined with radiation therapy on the prognosis and survival of patients with spinal oligometastatic cancer, describe the clinical results, and optimize future treatment goals

Read the detailed description

Patients with oligometastatic diseases have been shown to have better prognosis than those with multiple metastatic diseases, and some patients have achieved long-term survival, thus being considered to benefit from more aggressive treatment. Active local treatment, including surgery and/or targeted radiotherapy, such as Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) and Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), can be performed before or after systemic treatment. For both primary and oligometastatic tumors, radical treatment should be considered in order to achieve better survival and prognosis. The current research has explored the different effects of oligometastatic disease status on the prognosis of various cancers. However, there is currently no clear clinical or experimental confirmation of the impact on the survival and treatment outcomes of patients with oligometastatic spinal cancer. The purpose of this clinical trial is to explore the impact of En bloc hand surgery and separation surgery combined with radiotherapy on the prognosis and survival of patients with oligometastatic spinal cancer, Describe clinical outcomes and optimize future treatment goals

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Metastases
  • Spinal Tumor
  • Radiotherapy
  • Malignant Bone Tumor
  • Surgery

Keywords

  • Total enbloc spondylectomy
  • Oligometastases
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

According to the literature results, the median survival period of the experimental group was 20 months, while the median survival period of the control group was 11 months. The total study duration (enrollment+follow-up) was 48 months, and the enrollment time (assuming uniform enrollment speed) was 24 months. The bilateral alpha was 0.05, the beta was 0.2, and the ratio of sample size between the two groups was 2 (experimental group: control group). Through the difference test of median survival time, the experimental sample size was calculated: 110 cases in the experimental group, 55 cases in the control group, a total of 165 cases, Considering 10% detachment, a total of 182 samples are required.

Inclusion criteria

    1. Be able to sign written informed consent.
    1. Age range from 18 to 75 years old, regardless of gender.
    1. Within conservative treatment, the patient still has uncontrollable pain, metastatic cancer lesions that still progress, spinal instability/potential instability, or symptoms of spinal cord/nerve compression.
    1. After the patient underwent Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) examination, it was indicated that there were no more than 3 metastatic organs and no more than 5 metastatic lesions in the whole body of cancer. Among them, there was at least 1 spinal metastasis and at most 5 spinal metastases.
    1. Imaging examinations (enhanced MRI, enhanced CT, X-ray) indicate the presence of spinal metastasis.
    1. The expected survival period is ≥ 6 months.
  • 7)No other surgical contraindications

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Primary tumors of the spine or multiple tumors of the body, with>3 metastatic organs and>5 metastatic sites.
    1. Previously underwent spinal surgery, or received radiotherapy for the responsible segment of this treatment.
    1. Severe heart, lung, liver, kidney or other diseases affecting the surgery.
    1. Having cognitive impairment, sensory aphasia, and inability to understand basic instructions.
    1. Participated in clinical trials of other drugs or medical devices within 3 months prior to enrollment.
    1. Infectious diseases.
    1. Refuse to follow up or participate.
    1. The researchers determine that the patients are not suitable for enrollment this clinical trail.
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
182 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
2 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal oligometastases

    Based on the medical history, physical signs, and imaging examination results, a definitely diagnosis of spinal oligometastasis tumor was made and perform a Total en bloc spondylectomy.

    Procedure: total en bloc spondylectomy

  • Separation surgery combined with radiotherapy for spinal oligometastases

    Based on the medical history, physical signs, and imaging examination results, a definitely diagnosis of spinal oligometastasis tumor was made and perform a Separation surgery. After surgical recovery, take a radiotherapy.

Interventions

  • Proceduretotal en bloc spondylectomy

    Total enbloc resection (TES) is one of the most challenging surgeries in spinal surgery and a classic surgical method. It not only relieve spinal cord compression and delays tumor recurrence, but also prolongs patient survival, significantly reduces hand surgery trauma, and improves surgical safety. However, for cases with extensive tumor invasion, methods such as separation surgery should be used to relieve spinal cord nerve compression, rebuild spinal stability, and provide conditions for postoperative radiotherapy.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival(OS)

    On the basis of maintaining systemic treatment, compare the overall survival period of En bloc surgery and separation surgery combined with radiation therapy for patients with spinal oligometastatic cancer, after surgery until death due to primary disease or responsible segment.

    Time frame: after surgery until death due to primary disease or responsible segment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Local Control Rate(LRC)

    Based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), it is defined as a 20% increase in the total diameter of the target lesion observed on imaging from the beginning of the patient's current treatment to baseline.

    Time frame: a 20% increase in the total diameter of the target lesion observed on imaging from the beginning of the patient's current treatment to baseline.

  2. Progression-Free Survival(PFS)

    The period between the patient receiving this treatment and observing local progression or death from any cause. Based on the changes in patient imaging and neurological function, comprehensively evaluate whether the local lesion of the spine is progressing.

    Time frame: The period between the patient receiving this treatment and observing local progression or death from any cause.

  3. Brief Pain inventory

    Use the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) to score the pain levels 1 day before surgery, 2 weeks after surgery, 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, and 12 months after surgery.

    Time frame: 1 day before surgery, 2 weeks after surgery, 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, and 12 months after surgery.

  4. EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30

    Evaluate the quality of life of patients 1 day before surgery, 2 weeks after surgery, 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, and 12 months after surgery using EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30

    Time frame: 1 day before surgery, 2 weeks after surgery, 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, and 12 months after surgery

  5. Complication

    The incidence of vertebral compression fractures: X-ray examination of the surgical area was performed on the first day, within 3 months, within 6 months, and within 12 months respectively. Wound complications: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein tests were performed on the first day after surgery. Observe and record the incidence of incision infection, incision non healing, and the need for debridement within 1 month after surgery. Other complications: Observe whether the patient experiences bleeding, pulmonary infection, or pulmonary embolism within one month after treatment.

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery.

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4. PubMed 33538338 ↗
  • Barzilai O, Laufer I, Yamada Y, Higginson DS, Schmitt AM, Lis E, Bilsky MH. Integrating Evidence-Based Medicine for Treatment of Spinal Metastases Into a Decision Framework: Neurologic, Oncologic, Mechanicals Stability, and Systemic Disease. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 20;35(21):2419-2427. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7362. Epub 2017 Jun 22. PubMed 28640703 ↗
  • Barzilai O, McLaughlin L, Amato MK, Reiner AS, Ogilvie SQ, Lis E, Yamada Y, Bilsky MH, Laufer I. Predictors of quality of life improvement after surgery for metastatic tumors of the spine: prospective cohort study. Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1109-1115. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.070. Epub 2017 Nov 6. PubMed 29122701 ↗
  • Chang JH, Shin JH, Yamada YJ, Mesfin A, Fehlings MG, Rhines LD, Sahgal A. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases: What are the Risks and How Do We Minimize Them? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Oct 15;41 Suppl 20(Suppl 20):S238-S245. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001823. PubMed 27488294 ↗
  • Kumar N, Madhu S, Bohra H, Pandita N, Wang SSY, Lopez KG, Tan JH, Vellayappan BA. Is there an optimal timing between radiotherapy and surgery to reduce wound complications in metastatic spine disease? A systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2020 Dec;29(12):3080-3115. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06478-5. Epub 2020 Jun 15. PubMed 32556627 ↗
  • Goetz MP, Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW, Farrell MA, Maus TP, Welch TJ, Wong GY, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Petersen IA, Beres RA, Regge D, Capanna R, Saker MB, Gronemeyer DH, Gevargez A, Ahrar K, Choti MA, de Baere TJ, Rubin J. Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation of painful metastases involving bone: a multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 15;22(2):300-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.097. PubMed 14722039 ↗
  • Dupuy DE, Liu D, Hartfeil D, Hanna L, Blume JD, Ahrar K, Lopez R, Safran H, DiPetrillo T. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of painful osseous metastases: a multicenter American College of Radiology Imaging Network trial. Cancer. 2010 Feb 15;116(4):989-97. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24837. PubMed 20041484 ↗
  • Murali N, Turmezei T, Bhatti S, Patel P, Marshall T, Smith T. What is the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation in the management of patients with spinal metastases? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Nov 6;16(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02775-x. PubMed 34742319 ↗
  • D'Souza M, Gendreau J, Feng A, Kim LH, Ho AL, Veeravagu A. Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery: History, Efficacy, Cost, And Future Trends. Robot Surg. 2019 Nov 7;6:9-23. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S190720. eCollection 2019. Erratum In: Robot Surg. 2019 Dec 23;6:25. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S238276. PubMed 31807602 ↗
  • Kaoudi A, Capel C, Chenin L, Peltier J, Lefranc M. Robot-Assisted Radiofrequency Ablation of a Sacral S1-S2 Aggressive Hemangioma. World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:226-229. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.060. Epub 2018 May 17. PubMed 29777897 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06120426
Lead sponsor
Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
Collaborators
Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University People's Hospital, Henan Cancer Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhejiang University, Tianjin Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University
Responsible party
Jianru Xiao (shanghaiczh, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 7, 2023
Start date
Jul 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 13, 2023

Study contacts

Jianru Xiao, Doctor
Contact
jianruxiao83@163.com
+86 13701785283
Wei Xu, Doctor
Contact
xuweichangzheng@hotmail.com
+86 13761278657

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion