An interventional study of Pulsed Field Ablation in Atrial Arrhythmia, Atrial Fibrillation and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices. Active, not recruiting at 11 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-06.
Sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This clinical investigation is intended to demonstrate safety and effectiveness of the Volt™ Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) Catheter Sensor Enabled™, the Volt™ PFA Generator, Agilis™ NxT Steerable Introducer Dual-Reach™, and EnSite™ X EP System EnSite™ Pulsed Field Ablation Module (for simplicity of reference this device collection will hereafter be referred to as the Volt™ PFA system) for the treatment of symptomatic, recurrent, drug-refractory paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.
The main study is a pre-market, prospective, single-arm, non-randomized, multicenter clinical study to demonstrate safety and effectiveness for the treatment of symptomatic, recurrent, drug-refractory Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF) and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (PersAF). The main study design includes a feasibility sub-study in which additional imaging assessments will be collected in a small cohort of subjects to confirm acute safety of the Volt PFA System in humans.
The enrollment extension will include up to an additional 150 subjects enrolled with market-released or investigational devices, depending on enrollment geography.
3,869 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 923 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.
Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →Abbott Medical Devices is the lead sponsor of 525 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.
Of its 52 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 43 (83%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Documented symptomatic PAF or PersAF. Documentation requirements are as follows:
Paroxysmal:
Persistent: Continuous AF sustained beyond 7 days and less than 1 year that is documented by
Two electrocardiograms (from any form of rhythm monitoring) showing continuous AF:
NOTE: Documented evidence of the AF episode must either be continuous AF on a 12-lead ECG or include at least 30 seconds of AF from another ECG device.
Exclusion Criteria:
Device: Pulsed Field Ablation
Pulsed field ablation using the Volt PFA System
Rate of subjects experiencing a device and/or procedure-related serious adverse event with onset within 7-days of any ablation procedure that uses the Volt PFA System.
Serious adverse events are defined as: * Atrio-esophageal fistula * Cardiac tamponade/perforation * Death * Heart block * Myocardial infarction * Pericarditis * Phrenic nerve injury resulting in permanent diaphragmatic paralysis * Pulmonary edema * Pulmonary vein stenosis * Stroke/cerebrovascular accident * Thromboembolism * Transient ischemic attack * Vagal nerve injury/gastroparesis * Major vascular access complications / major bleeding events * Device and/or procedure related cardiovascular and/or pulmonary adverse event that prolongs hospitalization for more than 48 hours (excluding hospitalization solely for arrhythmia recurrence or non-urgent cardioversion)
Time frame: 7-days
Acute procedural effectiveness summarized as the rate of pulmonary veins treated with the Volt PFA system that are isolated at the end of the index ablation procedure.
Acute procedural failure for each pulmonary vein is defined as any of the following: 1. Inability to isolate a pulmonary vein at the end of the index ablation procedure. Isolation will be assessed via confirmation of electrical isolation in each ablated pulmonary vein after a minimum waiting period of 20 minutes via entrance block at a minimum. Touch-up ablation to achieve isolation will be allowed for any pulmonary vein reconnection detected during the index procedure with the investigational catheter (to the maximum delivery allowed per vein) and will not be considered a failure. 2. Any use of a non-study ablation device for pulmonary vein isolation.
Time frame: During procedure
Long-term 6-month effectiveness summarized as the rate of freedom from documented AF/AFL/AT episodes of >30 seconds duration after the index ablation procedure through 6 months of follow-up.
The situations in which subjects will be considered long-term effectiveness endpoint failures: * Acute procedural failure * Any use of a non-study ablation device for pulmonary vein isolation or to deliver ablation lesions in the left atrium during the index procedure or during the first repeat procedure. * If documented AF/AFL/AT recurrence occurs at any time after the blanking period * If subject requires a repeat procedure for the treatment of AF, non-CTI-dependent AFL, or AT after the blanking period or a second repeat AF ablation procedure at any time after the index ablation procedure. * Any use of a new class I or III AAD for AF after the blanking period. * Any use of a class I or III AAD for AF at a dose higher than the historical maximum dose for the subject after the blanking period. * If the subject requires a cardioversion for the treatment of AF/AFL/AT after the blanking period * Surgical treatment of AF/AFL/AT post index procedure.
Time frame: 6 months
Plan to share: No
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Abbott Medical Devices