CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06099132CC2017Updated Oct 25, 2023

Antagonist Activation Measurement at the Ankle Using High-density and Bipolar Surface EMG in Chronic Hemiparesis

An observational study in Stroke, Muscle Hypertonia and Spasticity, Muscle, sponsored by Henri Mondor University Hospital. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-25.

Sponsored by Henri Mondor University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In chronic hemiparesis, abnormal antagonist muscle activation in the paretic lower limb contributes to impair ambulation capacities. A biased estimate of antagonist muscle activation when using surface bipolar EMG compared with high-density (HD) EMG has been previously reported in healthy subjects. The present study compares muscles cocontraction at the paretic ankle estimated with a pair of and multi-channel surface EMG.

Read the detailed description

In chronic hemiparesis, gait velocity deficit is associated with a disturbed voluntary movement caused especially by inappropriate antagonist muscle activation. The present study investigates muscles cocontraction at the paretic ankle estimated with a pair of and multi-channel surface EMG (HD-EMG) in patients after stroke. HD-EMGs were collected from gastrocnemius medialis (GM), tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (SO) during isometric contractions. From these EMGs the study asked whether bipolar and HD-EMGs provided comparable estimates of antagonist activation. Two active contraction levels (submaximal vs. maximal) and knee positions (flexed vs. extended) were assessed for each muscle. Notwithstanding the evidence of localized antagonist activation in the GM muscle of healthy subjects, hypothesizing equally localized antagonist activation in the paretic limb may not follow from the current literature. In virtue of evidence supporting the enlargement of motor unit territories in paretic and hyperactive muscles, it may be that stroke survivors have lost their ability to regionally and appropriately activate their muscle. In this case, bipolar and HD-EMG would be expected to provide comparable antagonist activation coefficients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Muscle Hypertonia
  • Spasticity, Muscle
03

In context

Muscle Spasticity

704 studies on the registry are indexed under Muscle Spasticity; 149 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 60 across 162 observational studies indexed under Muscle Spasticity.

Browse Muscle Spasticity studies →

Lead sponsor

Henri Mondor University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Person with chronic hemiparesis due to a non-evolutive central nervous system lesion

Inclusion criteria

  • hemiparesis due to a non-evolutive central nervous system lesion
  • time since lesion ≥ 6 months
  • ability to walk 10 meters barefoot without any assistance
  • cognitive abilities to understand the verbal instructions for the test according to the investigator's judgment
  • absence of botulinum toxin injections within the last 3 months prior to enrolment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • botulinum toxin injections within the last 3 months prior to enrolment
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testElectromyographic measurements

    HD and bipolar EMG were assessed from gastrocnemius medialis (GM), soleus (SO) and tibialis anterior (TA) at seated position, ankle at 0°, during isometric submaximal effort and maximal effort, knee flexed (90°) and knee extended (0°)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Coefficient of ANtagonist activation

    The Coefficient of ANtagonist activation of 3 muscles was calculated by the ratio between the root mean square amplitude during antagonist effort and maximal agonist effort for the same muscle.

    Time frame: 5 seconds

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06099132
Lead sponsor
Henri Mondor University Hospital
Responsible party
Emilie Hutin (Director, Henri Mondor University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 25, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2017
Completion
Dec 31, 2017
Last update
Oct 25, 2023

Study contacts

Emilie Hutin
study director · Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion