ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06098157TRUFFLEUpdated Dec 30, 2024

Tuebingen Register of Union Failure After Fractures of the Upper and Lower Extremities

An observational study in Pseudarthrosis and Ununited Fracture, sponsored by Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery at Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, BG Klinik Tu. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-30.

Sponsored by Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery at Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, BG Klinik Tu · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2020; still recruiting 6 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
850
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

TRUFFLE is a register of clinical patient data of failed bone healing and bone non-union after fracture. All patients suffering from a long bone delayed or non-union after fracture and undergoing revision surgery are registered with their clinical data, comorbidities, medication, soft tissue status, radiographic status, Non-Union Scoring System (NUSS) Score and are followed up until final bone healing or end of treatment. The register consists of more than 800 patients cases. The aim is to identify risk factors for healing of non-unions. Data analysis will compare those patients that undergo regular healing to those of insufficient healing.

Read the detailed description

Bone non-union is a severe complication in trauma surgery. It requires complex surgical intervention leading to decisive restrictions for the patient as well as socioeconomic burden for the health care systems. Despite extensive research, up to date, bone healing has not yet been fully understood. Many risk factors impairing bone healing causing delayed healing or even non-union after fracture have been studied in the past. However, these studies mainly focus on secondary and tertiary prevention measures id est when fracture healing is delayed or the non-union is already present. Research concerning the identification of risk factors concerning primary prevention of non-healing after non-union treatment are scarce, usually investigate a certain anatomical location. Also, as the incidence of non-union (5 % to 10 %) is very low, these studies often only include a limited number of cases and brief follow-up periods.

Thus, TRUFFLE was started as a register for non-union cases aiming for large number of patients cases with consisted data and a follow-up period till the end of treatment.

All patients suffering from a long bone delayed or non-union after fracture and undergoing revision surgery are registered with their clinical data, comorbidities, medication, soft tissue status, radiographic status, Non-Union Scoring System (NUSS) Score and are followed up until final bone healing or end of treatment. The register consists of more than 800 patients cases.

All parameters examined are evaluated at the time of non-union index procedure. Data include demographic parameters as age and gender, type of primary injury according to classification of the AO foundation, severity of primary injury (injury severity score (ISS) > 16), Gustilo-Anderson classification at the time of initial trauma, presence of traumatic brain injury, number of previous soft tissue surgeries before non-union index procedure. The state of infection of the designated bone segment stated by proof of microbiological colonization at the time of non-union index procedure is assessed, as well as Weber/Cech classification of non-union. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, rheumatological conditions, cancer and neurological disease (i.e. Parkinson's disease), as well as tobacco smoking and classification according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA classification) are assessed. Intake of medication and lab parameters are listed. Any subsequent revision surgery related to the designated non-union is included during patients follow-up. The NUSS- Score is evaluated and calculated according to above listed parameters. Also, subjective parameters of patients quality of life are included at non-union index procedure and at subsequent follow-ups.

Bone healing or unsuccessful healing serve as primary outcome parameter as well as time to heal.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pseudarthrosis
  • Ununited Fracture

Keywords

  • bone
  • non-union
  • delayed union
  • delayed bone healing
  • pseudarthrosis
  • callus formation
  • ununited fracture
  • fracture healing
03

In context

Pseudarthrosis

41 studies on the registry are indexed under Pseudarthrosis; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 850 is above the median of 60 across 16 observational studies indexed under Pseudarthrosis.

Browse Pseudarthrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery at Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, BG Klinik Tu is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients treated for delayed bone healing or non-union in a level 1 hospital of maximum trauma care

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age >18 years
  • presence of long bone non-union that required surgical treatment.
  • radiological signs according to the criteria of the Radiographic Union Scale of Tibial fractures (RUST).
  • clinical signs as pain, lack of weight bearing and/or limitation on range of motion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age \<18 years
  • Patients with non surgical intervention and presence of long bone non-union
  • bone non-union that resulted from elective orthopedic surgery (e.g. osteotomies).
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
850 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. number of participants with successful bone healing

    End of treatment can either be successful healing or treatment with no success in bone healing (i.e. amputation, total joint replacement). The number of participants reaching successful healing (responders) to those who are not reaching successful healing (non-responders) will be analyzed.

    Time frame: minimum of 1 year up to 5 years after non-union index procedure

  2. Time to heal

    Time to heal is defined as the length of time from non-union index procedure to date of last follow-up visit that stated radiographic and clinical success or unsuccessful bone healing (i.e. amputation, total joint replacement).

    Time frame: minimum of 1 year up to 5 years after non-union index procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Charlson Comorbidity Index

    Comorbidities are listed according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index, at time of non-union index procedure. 19 comorbidities and patients age are listed according to which a score from 0 to \> 5 is calculated. A 1 - year mortality risk is predicted. The higher the score from 0 to 5 combined with increasing age, the higher the risk of mortality, with 0 as the lowest score with the lowest risk, and \> 5 as the highest score with the highest risk.

    Time frame: minimum of 1 year up to 5 years after non-union index procedure

  2. number of medication

    any intake of medication at time of non-union index procedure is listed. The number of medications are evaluated.

    Time frame: minimum of 1 year up to 5 years after non-union index procedure

  3. number of participants undergoing type of revision surgery

    number of participants undergoing several types of revision surgery (plate, nail, external fixation, autologous bone grafting) at time of non-union index procedure

    Time frame: minimum of 1 year up to 5 years after non-union index procedure

  4. number of participants suffering from local infection

    number of participants suffering from type of local infection at time of non-union index procedure is listed. Microbiological tests can reveal bacterial infection. Any sort of bacterial infection of local soft tissue and bone non-union according to microbiological tests are listed and qualify for infection (yes or no).

    Time frame: minimum of 1 year up to 5 years after non-union index procedure

  5. NUSS - non union scoring system

    All individual parameters of the 3 categories within the NUSS (bone-, patient- soft tissue related) are captured. A maximum score of 100 points can be scored. The score is related to 4 risk groups according to the number of points reached. The higher the number the points the higher is the risk group (1 - 25 points for risk group 1, 26 - 50 points for risk group 2, 51 - 75 points for risk group 3, 76 - 100 points for risk group 4). A surgical procedure is suggested according to the risk group with only limited surgical intervention in risk group 1 and increasing invasiveness for risk groups with higher scores (2, 3 and 4). Risk group 4 with the highest score level suggest severe surgical interventions (i.e. amputation or total joint implantation). The NUSS and subsequent risk group - levels are analyzed at time of non-union index procedure and any subsequent follow up visit that requires a surgical procedure.

    Time frame: minimum of 1 year up to 5 years after non-union index procedure

  6. Weber Cech classification

    Weber Cech classification (atrophic, hypertrophic, oligotrophic) at time of non-union index procedure

    Time frame: minimum of 1 year up to 5 years after non-union index procedure

  7. patient reported outcome measures (PROMS)

    The EQ5D5L, a standardized measure of health-related quality of life developed by the EuroQol Group with 5 dimensions and 5 levels, is assessed by the patient at time of non-union index procedure and every follow- up visit. A score from 1 to 5 can be reached with 1 being the lowest, and 5 being the highest score. The higher the score the worse is the health state of the participant.

    Time frame: minimum of 1 year up to 5 years after non-union index procedure

  8. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification

    The ASA Score (I - VI) measures the physical status of a patients before surgical intervention. ASA I represents a good state of health, while ASA VI represents a very severe state of health (i.e. a declared brain dead person). It is assessed at time of non-union index procedure and before any subsequent follow- up surgery.

    Time frame: minimum of 1 year up to 5 years after non-union index procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 71 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 28, 2023
First posted
Oct 24, 2023
StartActual
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2030
Last update
Dec 30, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06098157
Lead sponsor
Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery at Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, BG Klinik Tu
Responsible party
Marie K. Reumann (Principal Investigator, Head of Clinical Trauma Research, Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery at Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, BG Klinik Tu) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 24, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 30, 2024

Study contacts

Marie K Reumann, MD
Contact
mreumann@bgu-tuebingen.de
+497071606 ext. 3113
Marie K Reumann, MD
study director · Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery at Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion