CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06094478HI-SPEEDUpdated May 20, 2026

Hospital Implementation of a Stroke Protocol for Emergency Evaluation and Disposition

An interventional study of HI-SPEED Protocol in Stroke, Acute, Ischemic Stroke, Acute and Hemorrhagic Stroke, sponsored by University of Chicago. Recruiting at 8 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-20.

Sponsored by University of Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 1 year 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
900
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Most stroke patients are initially evaluated at the closest hospital but some need to be transferred to a hospital that can provide more advanced care. The "Door-In-Door-Out" (DIDO) process at the first hospital can take time making transferred patients no longer able to get the advanced treatments. This study will help hospitals across the US "stand up" new ways to evaluate stroke patients, decide who needs to be transferred, and transfer them quickly for advanced treatment.

Read the detailed description

Nearly 800,000 people in the United States (US) each year experience acute stroke, which remains the leading cause of adult disability and 5th leading cause of death. Despite the proliferation of stroke centers nationwide, almost half of the US population lives beyond a 60-minute drive of a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) and many patients require inter-hospital transfer (IHT) from a non-CSC to a CSC. Building upon prior work to reduce door-in-door-out (DIDO) time at referring hospitals, this proposal entitled "Hospital Implementation of a Stroke Protocol for Emergency Evaluation and Disposition (HI-SPEED)" study seeks to (1) implement a novel, evidence-based, multi-component DIDO intervention in eight diverse stroke systems of care across multiple regions of the US and (2) conduct a dual evaluation of its effectiveness in reducing median DIDO time (primary outcome) and disability (secondary outcome) and of the fidelity and quality of implementation. The HI-SPEED study will definitively establish the effectiveness and generalizability of a multi-component evidence-based DIDO intervention and provide information about contextual adaptations for high-quality implementation and widespread dissemination. This study benefits from our well-established interdisciplinary expertise in stroke, emergency and prehospital medicine, systems and quality engineering, health services research, and strong multicenter research collaborations. Findings from HI-SPEED will have substantial implications for a wide range of hospitals and stroke systems of care worldwide.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke, Acute
  • Ischemic Stroke, Acute
  • Hemorrhagic Stroke

Keywords

  • interhospital transfer
  • quality improvement
  • implementation science
  • stroke systems of care
03

In context

Stroke

7,287 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,006 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 900 is above the median of 50 across 5,370 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 907 studies on the registry; 182 are open to participants now.

Of its 99 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 68 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >=18 years
  • Final diagnosis: AIS, ICH, or SAH

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Final diagnosis: TIA or stroke NOS
  • Age \<18 years
  • Comfort care measures on day 0 or 1
  • Left hospital against medical advice
  • Enrolled in clinical trial related to stroke that is competing with this study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
900 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control Phase

    Pre-implementation of HI-SPEED Protocol

  • Active comparator
    Implementation Phase

    Post-Implementation of HI-SPEED Protocol

    Behavioral: HI-SPEED Protocol

Interventions

  • BehavioralHI-SPEED Protocol

    The HI-SPEED Protocol or Bundle consists of 7 components including 1) stroke screening scales, 2) imaging pathways, 3) telestroke operations, 4) a best practice alert, 5) stroke team communication tool, 6) door-to-needle (thrombolysis) treatment pathway, and 7) a standardized hand-off tool. This protocol will be implemented at each participating health system in clusters of 2 health systems.

    Also known as: HI-SPEED Bundle

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. DIDO time in acute ischemic stroke patients

    Time from ED arrival to ED departure prior to transfer to a comprehensive stroke center among ischemic stroke patients

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. DIDO time in acute hemorrhagic stroke patients

    Time from ED arrival to ED departure prior to transfer to a comprehensive stroke center among hemorrhagic stroke patients

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular therapy

    Proportion of acute ischemic stroke patients who undergo endovascular therapy and achieve good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) at 3 months post-stroke

    Time frame: 3 months post-stroke

07

Study locations

8 of 8 sites recruiting
  • Yale New Haven Hospital
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
    Recruiting
  • Jackson Memorial Hospital
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
    • Gillian Gordon Perue, MD · Contact · ggordonperue@miami.edu · 786-466-1380
    • Gillian Gordon Perue, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Emory University Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
    • Fadi Nahab, MD · Contact · fnahab@emory.edu
    • Fadi Nahab, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • UChicago Medicine Ingalls Memorial Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60426, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Michigan Hospital
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
    • Will Meurer, MD, MS · Contact · wmeurer@umich.edu
    • Will Meurer, MD, MS · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Hospital
    New York, New York 10065, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Cincinnati Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45267, United States
    • Christopher T Richards, MD, MS · Contact · richa2ch@ucmail.uc.edu · 513-585-8962
    • Christopher T Richards, MD, MS · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • University of Utah Health
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Anderson CS, Chalmers J, Stapf C. Blood-pressure lowering in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 26;369(13):1274-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1309586. No abstract available. PubMed 24066751 ↗
  • Richards CT, Holl JL, Khorzad R, Prabhakaran S. Abstract TMP70: Simulation Modeling Predicts Actual Patient Transport Rates Following the Implementation of a Prehospital Comprehensive Stroke Center DirectTransport Protocol. Stroke. 2020;51(Suppl_1):ATMP70-ATMP70.
  • Menon BK, Saver JL, Goyal M, Nogueira R, Prabhakaran S, Liang L, Xian Y, Hernandez AF, Fonarow GC, Schwamm L, Smith EE. Trends in endovascular therapy and clinical outcomes within the nationwide Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry. Stroke. 2015 Apr;46(4):989-95. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007542. Epub 2015 Feb 13. PubMed 25681065 ↗
  • Saver JL, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Reeves MJ, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Pan W, Olson DM, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Schwamm LH. Time to treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and outcome from acute ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2013 Jun 19;309(23):2480-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6959. PubMed 23780461 ↗
  • Mendelson SJ, Aggarwal NT, Richards C, O'Neill K, Holl JL, Prabhakaran S. Racial disparities in refusal of stroke thrombolysis in Chicago. Neurology. 2018 Jan 30;90(5):e359-e364. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004905. Epub 2018 Jan 3. PubMed 29298854 ↗
  • Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812. PubMed 22310560 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Only aggregate data and analyses will be shared between sites while sites will have IPD for their own site level data only.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06094478
Lead sponsor
University of Chicago
Collaborators
University of Miami, Yale University, University of Cincinnati, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, University of Utah, Emory University, University of Michigan, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 23, 2023
Start date
Oct 17, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 20, 2026

Study contacts

Shyam Prabhakaran, MD, MS
Contact
shyam1@bsd.uchicago.edu
773-702-0080
Jane L Holl, MD, MPH
Contact
jholl@bsd.uchicago.edu
773-702-8186
Shyam Prabhakaran, MD, MS
principal investigator · University of Chicago
Jane Holl, MD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion