CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06651788Updated Oct 8, 2026

Does Ethyl Chloride Spray Work?

An interventional study of Ethyl Chloride and Cold Saline Spray in Injection Fear, Injection Pain Prevention and Injection Complication, sponsored by University of Chicago. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-08.

Sponsored by University of Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2025; still recruiting 1 year 6 months later.
Updated Oct 8, 2026Enrollment updatedEligibility revisedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
246
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A procedure frequently performed by orthopaedic providers is the administration of corticosteroid injections for the management of various soft tissues and joint-related conditions, such as osteoarthritis, tendinitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger, and de Quervain's tenosynovitis. While these injections have demonstrated effectiveness in alleviating symptoms, the discomfort associated with the procedure can be a source of anxiety and apprehension for patients. This discomfort arises from the sensation of the needle entering the affected area and the burning sensation induced by the corticosteroid solution.

Read the detailed description

A procedure frequently performed by orthopaedic providers is the administration of corticosteroid injections for the management of various soft tissues and joint-related conditions, such as osteoarthritis, tendinitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger, and de Quervain's tenosynovitis. While these injections have demonstrated effectiveness in alleviating symptoms, the discomfort associated with the procedure can be a source of anxiety and apprehension for patients. This discomfort arises from the sensation of the needle entering the affected area and the burning sensation induced by the corticosteroid solution.

In response to this concern, orthopaedic providers have turned to freeze sprays (Ethyl chloride), which are topical anesthetics that rapidly cool the skin and underlying tissues. By numbing the injection site superficially, freeze sprays offer the potential to mitigate patient discomfort during corticosteroid injections, thus improving the overall patient experience and potentially enhancing treatment compliance.

However, despite the popularity of freeze spray usage in orthopaedics, many orthopaedic providers have concerns about its efficacy when it comes to providing pain relief. There still needs to be comprehensive scientific evidence evaluating its efficacy and safety. A previous study evaluated the efficacy of freeze spray in hand surgery in a randomized study of 150 subjects without standardized outcomes measures. These investigators showed no difference between those receiving freeze spray vs no spray in pain or anxiety; another study of vapocoolant spray in IV start sites in the emergency department similarly showed no difference in pain or anxiety. Based on the literature, there is no definitive standard of care to use freeze spray with injections and this is the gap in knowledge we wish to answer with a rigorous, placebo-controlled study. This study will differ from the previous similar study in that the investigators will recruit double the number of patients and use standardized commonly accepted questionnaires. The use of a questionnaire based on standardized metrics will provide a more comprehensive assessment of patient perceptions and satisfaction with the use of freeze spray. Through a rigorous research approach, the investigators aim to provide valuable insights into the impact of freeze spray on patient comfort, injection success rates, and any potential complications associated with its use.

This study will contribute to the ongoing efforts of hand surgeons to refine their techniques, minimize patient discomfort, and optimize the delivery of corticosteroid injections. Ultimately, the investigators' findings may have significant implications for the broader field of musculoskeletal medicine, offering evidence-based guidance to improve the patient experience and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Injection Fear
  • Injection Pain Prevention
  • Injection Complication

Keywords

  • Injection
  • Freeze spray
  • corticosteroid injections
  • Ethyl chloride
  • Orthopeadics
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 907 studies on the registry; 182 are open to participants now.

Of its 99 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 68 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years and older
  • Receiving a corticosteroid injection in an upper or lower extremity (to include soft tissue and joint injections)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 17 years old and younger
  • declines enrollment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
246 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Freeze spray group

    Ethyl Chloride Usage Prior to Orthopaedic Injections

    Other: Ethyl Chloride

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo application of cold saline spray

    Saline spray before injection

    Other: Cold Saline Spray

  • No intervention
    No spray prior to injection

    No intervention before injection

Interventions

  • OtherEthyl Chloride

    Topical anesthetic that rapidly cools the skin and underlying tissues

  • OtherCold Saline Spray

    placebo application of cold saline spray

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To determine if freeze spray usage before corticosteroid injections significantly reduces patient discomfort during the procedure as measured by pain scores before injection

    Using the visual analog pain scale (0 no pain - 10 worst possible pain) to ask patients their pain rating and if freeze spray usage before corticosteroid injections significantly reduces patient discomfort during the procedure.

    Time frame: 10 minutes before subject receives injection

  2. To determine if freeze spray usage before corticosteroid injections significantly reduces patient discomfort during the procedure as measured by pain scores after injeciton

    Using the visual analog pain scale (0 no pain - 10 worst possible pain) to ask patients their pain rating and if freeze spray usage before corticosteroid injections significantly reduces patient discomfort during the procedure.

    Time frame: 10 minutes after subject receives injection

  3. To assess patient perception of freeze spray efficacy in decreasing anxiety regarding injections.

    Using the treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication-II to ask patients their anxiety and if freeze spray usage before corticosteroid injections significantly reduces patient anxiety during the procedure.

    Time frame: 10 minutes after subject receives injection

  4. To assess their current overall status compared to their pre-injection baseline

    Using the single assessment numeric evaluation (0% furthest from normal and 100% normal) to ask patients their current status

    Time frame: 10 minutes after subject receives injection

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Randall DJ, Zhang Y, Li H, Hubbard JC, Kazmers NH. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit for the Pain Visual Analog Scale in a Postoperative Hand Surgery Population. J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Jul;47(7):645-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 May 27. PubMed 35644742 ↗
  • Edwards C, Noah C. A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial to Determine if Vapocoolant in the Adult Population Improves Patient Perception of Pain With Peripheral Intravascular Access. Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2017 Oct/Dec;39(4):288-294. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000165. PubMed 29095180 ↗
  • Franko OI, Stern PJ. Use and Effectiveness of Ethyl Chloride for Hand Injections. J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Mar;42(3):175-181.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.12.013. PubMed 28259274 ↗
  • Morote Robles J, Lorente JA, Reig C, Lopez Pacios MA, de Torres JA, Soler Rosello A. [The clinical and prognostic value of inversion of the PSA/PAP ratio in prostatic cancer]. Actas Urol Esp. 1994 May;18(5):559-61. Spanish. PubMed 7521563 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Enrollment
300→246
Oct 8, 2026
Also revised
eligibility
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 8, 2026
    Enrollment 300→246
    Eligibility Criteria revised
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06651788
Lead sponsor
University of Chicago
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 22, 2024
Start date
Apr 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 8, 2026

Study contacts

Jennifer M Wolf, MD, PhD
Contact
jwolf@bsd.uchicago.edu
773-834-3531
Jordan Swindle, MD
Contact
jordan.swindle@uchicagomedicine.org

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion