ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06088251Updated May 9, 2024

Evaluation of Nutrition Training Augmented With Digital Technology in Graduate Medical Education

An interventional study of Nutri Training and Standard Nutrition Education in Chronic Disease, sponsored by University of Texas at Austin. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-09.

Sponsored by University of Texas at Austin · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Investigators will conduct a randomized controlled evaluation of standard nutrition education vs. standard education + Nutri, and interactive clinical software that automates diet assessment and guides resident physicians through personalized and evidence-based diet counseling. Investigators will evaluate differences in resident-reported diet counseling competence and self-efficacy using survey measures. Investigators will evaluate skills using a simulated patient appointment and coding scheme described in prior work.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Medical Education
  • Nutrition Counseling
  • Technology
03

In context

Chronic Disease

1,004 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Disease; 174 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 58 is below the median of 121 across 729 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Disease.

Browse Chronic Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Texas at Austin is the lead sponsor of 326 studies on the registry; 78 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Dell Medical School Internal Medicine Residents
  • Dell Medical School Family Medicine Residents

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
58 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nutri Training

    Nutri Training will begin with 1) a presentation of diet counseling evidence and best practices for advising patients, along with information about nutrition recommendations for patients with chronic illness and 2) tools supporting the patient for follow-up. This content will be delivered via a live demonstration of the Nutri interactive software and case demonstration, a novel approach to delivering the learning objectives of standard nutrition education for residents.

    Behavioral: Nutri Training

  • Active comparator
    Standard Nutrition Education

    Standard Nutrition Training will present an overview of 1) nutrition recommendations for patients with chronic disease and 2) cover the role of a registered dietitian and referrals.

    Behavioral: Standard Nutrition Education

Interventions

  • BehavioralNutri Training

    Nutri Training will begin with 1) a presentation of diet counseling evidence and best practices for advising patients, along with information about nutrition recommendations for patients with chronic illness and 2) tools supporting the patient for follow-up. This content will be delivered via a live demonstration of the Nutri interactive software and case demonstration, a novel approach to delivering the learning objectives of standard nutrition education for residents.

  • BehavioralStandard Nutrition Education

    Standard Nutrition Education Standard Nutrition Training will present an overview of 1) nutrition recommendations for patients with chronic disease and 2) cover the role of a registered dietitian and referrals.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diet Counseling Competence

    Self-report of diet counseling competency; 4-point Likert-like scale scale; higher score means better outcome

    Time frame: Resident pre-assessment and post-assessment, expected to be 2 weeks after enrollment

  2. Diet Counseling Self-Efficacy

    Self-report of confidence (self-efficacy) in diet counseling; 4-point Likert-like scale scale; higher score means a better outcome.

    Time frame: Resident pre-assessment and post-assessment, expected to be 2 weeks after enrollment

  3. Diet Counseling Skills

    We will also use an observation checklist to systematically capture resident shared decision-making and diet counseling skills. We will create this checklist based on a literature review of similar tools, such as the Shared Decision Making (SDM) SDM-9 and the coding scheme described in Alexander 2011. Higher score indicates a better outcome. Score range will be reported once the scale has been finalized.

    Time frame: Post-hoc analysis of simulation activity, expected to be at 2 weeks after training intervention

Other outcomes

  1. Physician Diet Counseling Outcome Expectations

    Self-report of diet counseling outcome expectations; 5-point Likert-like scale; higher score means better outcome.

    Time frame: Resident pre-assessment and post-assessment, expected to be 2 weeks after enrollment

  2. Semi-structured debrief interview

    Semi-structured debrief interview to better understand the resident's experience and feedback on the training session and simulation activity.

    Time frame: Post-hoc analysis of simulation activity, expected to be at 2 weeks after training intervention

  3. Training Satisfaction

    Self-report of satisfaction with training; 5-point Likert-like scale scale; higher score means a better outcome.

    Time frame: Resident post-assessment, expected to be 2 weeks after enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Texas at Austin - Burgermaster Lab
    Austin, Texas 78705, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alexander SC, Cox ME, Boling Turer CL, Lyna P, Ostbye T, Tulsky JA, Dolor RJ, Pollak KI. Do the five A's work when physicians counsel about weight loss? Fam Med. 2011 Mar;43(3):179-84. PubMed 21380950 ↗
  • Jay M, Gillespie C, Ark T, Richter R, McMacken M, Zabar S, Paik S, Messito MJ, Lee J, Kalet A. Do internists, pediatricians, and psychiatrists feel competent in obesity care?: using a needs assessment to drive curriculum design. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):1066-70. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0519-y. PubMed 18612746 ↗
  • Kriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Harter M. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034. Epub 2009 Oct 30. PubMed 19879711 ↗
  • Vetter ML, Herring SJ, Sood M, Shah NR, Kalet AL. What do resident physicians know about nutrition? An evaluation of attitudes, self-perceived proficiency and knowledge. J Am Coll Nutr. 2008 Apr;27(2):287-98. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2008.10719702. PubMed 18689561 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2023 to primary completion in Feb 2024, 3 months.

Of 375 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Chronic Disease, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 33. This study's 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 388 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 33.

Chronic Disease covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 11, 2023
First posted
Oct 18, 2023
StartActual
Oct 24, 2023
Primary completionActual
Feb 15, 2024
CompletionActual
Feb 15, 2024
Last update
May 9, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06088251
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 18, 2023
Start date
Oct 24, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 15, 2024
Completion
Feb 15, 2024
Last update
May 9, 2024

Study contacts

Marissa Burgermaster, PhD
principal investigator · University of Texas at Austin

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion