ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05907343Updated Sep 2, 2026

Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation as a Potential Intervention for Cognitive Decline

An interventional study of Closed-loop TBS and Open-loop TBS in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Dementia (AD), sponsored by University of Texas at Austin. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-02.

Sponsored by University of Texas at Austin · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2023; still recruiting 3 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical study is to investigate the effectiveness of non-invasive stimulation to enhance cognitive control abilities in older adults with and without cognitive impairment. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • whether it is possible to restore various cognitive functions in older adults by delivering theta burst stimulation (TBS), a form of transcranial magnetic stimulation, and
  • whether closed-loop TBS is able to induce therapeutic benefits that outperform open-loop TBS.

Participants play a cognitive video game while a brain-computer interface (BCI) analyzes their electroencephalogram (EEG) signals and decodes the presence or absence of the contingent negative variation (CNV) potential, a marker of cognitive control. The BCI triggers TBS when its outputs indicate that the participant is not engaged properly in the video game.

Researchers will compare the effects of closed-loop and open-loop TBS using the outcome metrics described below to see how much cognitive restorations is achievable with each stimulation modality.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mild Cognitive Impairment
  • Alzheimer Dementia (AD)

Keywords

  • MCI
  • Older adults
  • Cognitive control
  • Memory impairment
  • Memory enhancement
03

In context

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,872 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,119 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 180 is above the median of 64 across 2,794 interventional studies indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Texas at Austin is the lead sponsor of 328 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Older adults

    1. Ages between 60 to 90 years
    2. Good general health
    3. Normal or corrected vision
    4. Completed elementary school education or able to understand middle school level experiment instructions
    5. Self reports cognitive complaints
  • Cognitively normal young adults

    1. Ages between 18 to 35 years
    2. Good general health
    3. Normal or corrected vision
    4. Completed elementary school education or able to understand middle school level experiment instructions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Self-report of neurological or psychiatric diseases that could be for TMS (e.g., personal history of epilepsy/seizure brain damage, history of fainting, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, current substance use disorder, etc.).
  2. Medications that elevate seizure threshold (e.g., stimulant medication, high dose bupropion).
  3. Factors hindering EEG acquisition and rTMS delivery (e.g., skin infection, wounds, dermatitis, unable to access the scalp of the participant (e.g., unremovable wig).
  4. Current participation in amyloid infusion treatment for Alzheimer's disease.
  5. Do not have the capacity to provide and does not have a Legally Authorized Representative.
  6. Resting motor threshold below the power limit in the laboratory. (Will be check on the first visit)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
180 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Closed-Loop TBS

    Device: Closed-loop TBS

  • Active comparator
    Open-Loop TBS

    Device: Open-loop TBS

Interventions

  • DeviceClosed-loop TBS

    A BCI records and analyzes the participant's EEG as they perform cognitively demanding video game tasks. The BCI delivers TBS with a real coil when its output indicates that the participant is not properly engaged in the video game.

  • DeviceOpen-loop TBS

    A BCI records and analyzes the participant's EEG as they perform cognitively demanding video game tasks. TBS with the real coil is delivered irrelevant of the BCI decoder output.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cognitive Assessment Batteries

    NIH Toolbox - Cognition Battery: A computerized battery assessing multiple cognitive domains. The primary metric for all subtests is the age- and education-adjusted T-score (normative mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). Includes: Dimensional Change Card Sort, Face-Name Associative Memory Test, Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test, Picture Sequence Memory Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of the BCI classifier output

    The BCI classifier output reflects the presence or absence of the cognitive EEG patterns elicited during the cognitive videogame tasks. For each participant, the BCI outputs will be compared to their behavioral responses (pressing or not pressing a button).

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks after intervention

  2. Behavioral performance of the video game task

    The behavioral performance, pressing or not pressing a button, reflects the level of cognitive control performance of the subjects. It measures whether the participants made a correct decision, and their response time, in a given trial.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks after intervention

  3. N-Back Task

    Measures working memory capacity and executive function. The primary metrics are accuracy (percentage of correct responses) and reaction time during the n-back conditions.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks after intervention.

  4. Affective Flexibility Task

    Measures the ability to shift cognitive sets in response to emotional versus non-emotional stimuli. The primary metric is the switch cost (the difference in reaction time and accuracy between repeat and switch trials).

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks after intervention

  5. Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire

    A 15-item self-report scale measuring transdiagnostic repetitive negative thinking (rumination and worry). Items are rated from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). The primary metric is the total PTQ score (range 0-60).

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks after intervention

  6. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

    A interview assessing the severity of depressive symptomatology (e.g., mood, insomnia, anxiety). The primary metric is the total score, with higher scores indicating greater severity.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks after intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All anonymized data will be made available by the online publication date. These data will be placed in public servers for any interested researcher to access it.

Time frame: Data will become permanently available by the online publication date.

Access criteria: Any interested researcher will have access.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05907343
Collaborators
Texas Alzheimer's Research and Care Consortium
Responsible party
Jose del R. Millan (Professor, University of Texas at Austin) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 18, 2023
Start date
May 31, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 2, 2026

Study contacts

José del R. Millán, PhD
Contact
jose.millan@austin.utexas.edu
512-232-8111
Minsu Zhang
Contact
minsuzhang@austin.utexas.edu
512-840-9310
José del R. Millán, PhD
principal investigator · University of Texas at Austin
Jared F. Benge, PhD, ABPP
principal investigator · University of Texas at Austin
Crystal M. Lantrip, PhD, LP
principal investigator · Neuropsychological Assessment Clinic

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion