CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06085859Updated Nov 18, 2023

Anesthesia Endoscope Mask is Applied to Sedation Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment

An interventional study of Routine nasal catheter group and Mask group in Hypoxemia, sponsored by Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital. Recruiting at 5 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-18.

Sponsored by Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2023, 2 years 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,208
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To investigate the efficacy and safety of new-type mask compared with nasal tube oxygen delivery in patients undergoing sedation of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Read the detailed description

This study aims to utilize a large sample, multicenter, prospective clinical trial using a new mask oxygen supply technology. If the study confirms that the new mask can improve the airway safety and effectiveness in patient examinations, while improving examination efficiency and reducing failure rates, it will provide safety assurance for the early diagnosis and treatment of upper gastrointestinal diseases in high-risk populations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypoxemia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • hypoxemia
  • sedation
  • gastrointestinal sedation procedure
  • non-invasive ventilation
  • endoscopy mask
03

In context

Hypoxia

1,231 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypoxia; 241 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,208 is above the median of 45 across 853 interventional studies indexed under Hypoxia.

Browse Hypoxia studies →

Lead sponsor

Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 76 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years;
  2. Upcoming upper gastrointestinal sedation procedure;
  3. Classification under the American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I-III;
  4. Baseline oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥95% in ambient air conditions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals with previously documented difficulties in mask ventilation (DMV);
  2. Patients predisposed to aspiration risks or episodes of vomiting;
  3. Facial or jaw injuries or congenital abnormalities that render conventional face mask application infeasible;
  4. An inability or unwillingness to utilize the novel disposable anesthesia face mask.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,208 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mask oxygen supply group

    The anaesthesia provider supplied oxygen via a nasal cannula at an oxygen flow rate of 8 Litres/minute supplied from an oxygen flowmeter

    Device: Mask group

  • Experimental
    Nasal oxygen supply group

    The study team applied the mask with a head strap to ensure a proper seal,simultaneously ensuring the same oxygen flow rate as the control group

    Device: Routine nasal catheter group

Interventions

  • DeviceRoutine nasal catheter group

    The anaesthesia provider supplied oxygen via a nasal cannula at an oxygen flow rate of 8 Litres/minute supplied from an oxygen flowmeter as described in the guide

  • DeviceMask group

    The study team applied the mask with a head strap to ensure a proper seal,simultaneously ensuring the same oxygen flow rate as the control group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of hypoxemia

    Incidences of oxygen saturation falling below 92%

    Time frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of compromised ventilation mandating primary manual intervention

    For the nasal catheter cohort, this entailed jaw elevation and deploying a standard mask to augment the oxygen concentration inhaled. Concurrently, for the mask cohort, primary intervention involved mandible lifting and secure fastening of the mask sleeve for inflation (while ensuring the operational aperture remains sealed).

    Time frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.

  2. Incidence necessitating sophisticated manual ventilatory support during pain-free gastroscopy

    If SpO2 levels further descended to ≤70% or persistently hovered below 85% for a duration exceeding 60 seconds, it mandated an immediate cessation of the ongoing procedure. The endoscope would be retracted, followed by the insertion of a standard oropharyngeal mask for assisted ventilation. In dire circumstances, the anesthesiologist might opt for advanced airway interventions, such as laryngeal mask application or endotracheal intubation.

    Time frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.

  3. Juxtaposition of hypoxemia onset time in both ventilation techniques

    The time span from the start of drug administration by the researcher to the first occurrence of blood oxygen saturation below 92%.

    Time frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.

  4. the temporal span from initial decline to recovery to 92% saturation in both ventilation techniques

    The time span from oxygen saturation below 92% to recovery to 92% after manual ventilatory support. If multiple episodes of hypoxia occur, all times will be added up

    Time frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.

  5. the lowest oxygen saturation in both ventilation techniques

    the lowest oxygen saturation from the start of medication administration to the participants's Aldrete score of 9.

    Time frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.

  6. Evaluation of procedural prolongation due to ventilation issues

    The extension time for examination is defined as the total time from stopping the operation and exiting the endoscope until the endoscope re-enters the digestive tract, to the same anatomical position before stopping the operation, If multiple episodes of withdrawal of endoscopy occur, all times will be added up

    Time frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.

  7. Apnea prevalence in both groups

    The study here we define apnea as 10 second without obvious respiratory movements of mesothorax and abdomen or snoring with paradoxical breathing

    Time frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.

  8. Satisfaction scores1 from patients, endoscopists, and anesthesiologists

    The scores of satisfaction 1:Are you satisfied with this endoscopic diagnosis and treatment,a score of 0 represents very dissatisfied, while a score of 10 represents very satisfied.

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure.

  9. Satisfaction scores2 from patients, endoscopists, and anesthesiologists

    The scores of satisfaction2:If there is a chance, are you willing to use this non-invasive oxygen device again,a score of 0 indicates a strong unwillingness, while a score of 10 indicates a strong willingness.

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure.

  10. The incidence of upper respiratory tract discomfort manifestations such as oral, nasal, an pharyngeal dryness and hemorrhage in two groups of participants.

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure.

  11. Inaugural insertion success rates in two groups of participants

    If the endoscopic operation fails to pass the pharynx after three attempts, recorded as the first insertion failure.

    Time frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
  • Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
    Chengdu, Sichuan, China
    Recruiting
  • First People's Hospital of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture
    Liangshan, Sichuan, China
    Recruiting
  • Second People's Hospital of Yibin
    Yibin, Sichuan, China
    Recruiting
  • Ziyang People's Hospital
    Ziyang, Sichuan, China
    Recruiting
  • Chengdu Second People's Hospital
    Sichuan, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Behrens A, Kreuzmayr A, Manner H, Koop H, Lorenz A, Schaefer C, Plauth M, Jetschmann JU, von Tirpitz C, Ewald M, Sackmann M, Renner W, Kruger M, Schwab D, Hoffmann W, Engelke O, Pech O, Kullmann F, Pampuch S, Lenfers B, Weickert U, Schilling D, Boehm S, Beckebaum S, Cicinnati V, Erckenbrecht JF, Dumoulin FL, Benz C, Rabenstein T, Haltern G, Balsliemke M, de Mas C, Kleber G, Pehl C, Vogt C, Kiesslich R, Fischbach W, Koop I, Kuehne J, Breidert M, Sass NL, May A, Friedrich C, Veitt R, Porschen R, Ellrichmann M, Arlt A, Schmitt W, Dollhopf M, Schmidbaur W, Dignass A, Schmitz V, Labenz J, Kaiser G, Krannich A, Barteska N, Ell C. Acute sedation-associated complications in GI endoscopy (ProSed 2 Study): results from the prospective multicentre electronic registry of sedation-associated complications. Gut. 2019 Mar;68(3):445-452. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311037. Epub 2018 Jan 3. PubMed 29298872 ↗
  • Nay MA, Fromont L, Eugene A, Marcueyz JL, Mfam WS, Baert O, Remerand F, Ravry C, Auvet A, Boulain T. High-flow nasal oxygenation or standard oxygenation for gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation in patients at risk of hypoxaemia: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (ODEPHI trial). Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jul;127(1):133-142. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.03.020. Epub 2021 Apr 28. PubMed 33933271 ↗
  • Goudra B, Nuzat A, Singh PM, Borle A, Carlin A, Gouda G. Association between Type of Sedation and the Adverse Events Associated with Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: An Analysis of 5 Years' Data from a Tertiary Center in the USA. Clin Endosc. 2017 Mar;50(2):161-169. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.019. Epub 2016 Apr 29. PubMed 27126387 ↗
  • Qin Y, Li LZ, Zhang XQ, Wei Y, Wang YL, Wei HF, Wang XR, Yu WF, Su DS. Supraglottic jet oxygenation and ventilation enhances oxygenation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients sedated with propofol: a randomized multicentre clinical trial. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Jul 1;119(1):158-166. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex091. PubMed 28974061 ↗
  • Bell GD, Bown S, Morden A, Coady T, Logan RF. Prevention of hypoxaemia during upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy by means of oxygen via nasal cannulae. Lancet. 1987 May 2;1(8540):1022-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92282-3. PubMed 2883355 ↗
  • Terblanche NCS, Middleton C, Choi-Lundberg DL, Skinner M. Efficacy of a new dual channel laryngeal mask airway, the LMA(R)Gastro Airway, for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective observational study. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;120(2):353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.075. Epub 2017 Dec 1. PubMed 29406183 ↗
  • King AB, Alvis BD, Hester D, Taylor S, Higgins M. Randomized trial of a novel double lumen nasopharyngeal catheter versus traditional nasal cannula during total intravenous anesthesia for gastrointestinal procedures. J Clin Anesth. 2017 May;38:52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.01.025. Epub 2017 Jan 22. PubMed 28372678 ↗
  • Hung KC, Chang YJ, Chen IW, Soong TC, Ho CN, Hsing CH, Chu CC, Chen JY, Sun CK. Efficacy of high flow nasal oxygenation against hypoxemia in sedated patients receiving gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2022 May;77:110651. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110651. Epub 2022 Jan 12. PubMed 35030538 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — After December 2024, the original data can be obtained through the author's email address.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06085859
Lead sponsor
Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
Collaborators
Anhui Sanhong Medical Device Technology Co., Ltd
Responsible party
Mengchang Yang (Principal Investigator, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 17, 2023
Start date
Oct 18, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 8, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 18, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion